Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media sway public opinion
Influence of media in politics
Media influence on politics and government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media sway public opinion
Gore’s The Assault on Reason, is Gore’s way of telling America to open their eyes and not be so gullible to the politicians’ games. Throughout the book he relates the problems with America now, to how the founders would have liked it, or tried to preserve our democracy. He never refers to our democracy as dead, but rather ill. There is a growing ignorance and neglect for political facts among the voting public, and many politicians are considering the voter’s consent something with monetary value, something that can be bought or sold. Factors such as reason, logic, and facts used to play a crucial role in the national conversation, but now it is as if it is myth. An example of the growing ignorance that Gore uses in his book even caught me …show more content…
by surprise. He says that, “70% of Americans believed that the person personally responsible for the attacks on 9/11was Saddam Hussein, and 50% of Americans still believe this today.” I am not going to lie, before reading this book I was a part of that 50%.
Political elites have a way of altering the media, and using the media as a weapon to get what they want, and most Americans are too ignorant to stop and analyze what’s going on and see the facts. The biggest vehicle that politicians use is the television, which is where Gore starts his book. Gore does an excellent job of selling television as a top contributor to the assault on reason, and this is because, unlike the newspaper or internet, television is a medium for the rich and powerful, because not just anyone can get on TV. Also, unlike the internet, television is a means in which elite politicians overload viewers with information passively, which means that people cannot have a two-way conversation, because to purchase airtime on television costs a pretty penny, and only the rich and powerful (political elites) have the money to get that kind of airtime. This is a …show more content…
direct example of the assault on reason, because on television when you’re not watching your show, game, or whatever, you are probably watching commercials, which is all advertising. Advertising, as Gore explains, directly plays into the assault on reason, because the whole system is set up off of effective means of manipulation, rather than reason and evidence which Gore calls “the manufacture of consent”. This means of manipulation has gone from commercial uses to politics now, where images on commercials trigger emotional responses rather than reasonable responses, and the biggest emotional response of them all is fear. The best example I can think of this would be the majority of political campaign commercials. In those commercials, there are images of broken houses and poor families, and then after some political elite comes into the picture everyone is smiling, and things look nicer, and there is just so much manipulation on the commercials that reason and logic have been thrown out the window. The following chapters elaborate on multiple problems with the Bush administration, but focuses on the secretive nature of the administration that excluded a lot of information from the general public that would have been helpful in making reasonable decisions, but rather the Bush administration disregarded evidence and expertise, especially when it did not agree with the decisions that the administration had already decided on.
One of the main examples described in the book was the authorization of torture and the attempts by the administration to create legal disarray involving the treatment of prisoners. This lead to Bush thinking he had the right to seize and imprison American citizens without trial, attack any country he saw as a threat, to wiretap people’s phones without them knowing to see if someone was planning any terrorist attacks, as well as searching people’s private property without warrants. The biggest surprise that I read were the reasons why Bush actually wanted to go to war with Iraq, but used Saddam Hussein and the 9/11 attacks as a vehicle to install fear into the American people, and trigger an emotional response from the general public thus making it easier for the Bush administration to pull the wool over our eyes and throw out all reasons and logic, thus getting the laws he wanted passed. Through this fear installed by the Bush administration, President Bush was able to sell the war and have religious extremists approve new federal judges. These new
judges passed new laws all according to Bush’s agenda. The Bush Administration even went so far as to break away from international treaties thus losing a lot of respect internationally, digging America into a bigger whole then it was already getting into. Overall, I feel that the main focus of the book, and the conclusion that I believe Gore wanted his audience to get to, was just simply to not be so ignorant and blind to the tricks of politicians, and to think more with reason and logic instead of falling for the propaganda that political elites express to the general public, through lies, deception, and television, which are all examples of the assault on reason. Gore did an amazing job laying out plenty of examples that expressed how there is corruption and trickery taking place with politicians and how the general public is so easily susceptible to that trickery. Surprisingly I found this book to be quite interesting, I am not into politics, nor reading about it; but this book wasn’t necessarily about politics but more rather the problems with government and corruption that took place during the Bush Administration. I found Gore’s examples to be very powerful and moving, but of course that is how it is meant to be perceived. It is hard for me to really take anything away from this book because I knew prior to reading it, how corrupt and scandalous politicians can be, so a lot of the ideas that Gore presented throughout the book was nothing novel to me. However, his examples that portrayed the corruption and wrong-doings in government really captured my attention, and made it hard for me to stop reading. I do not feel that my views of government are any different after reading this book because it only further reassured the thoughts I have about government and politicians. And who’s to say that if Bush were telling the story, it would be completely different, so of course there are two sides to every story, but I really enjoyed the way Gore told his side with his powerful examples and relatable topics, making this an intriguing and exciting read.
...suppression, and incarceration. That ended up costing American an estimated 10,000 jobs. The government had complete control over the media, educational system, and any literature that was available. Books were illegal, and were burned in the novel by the government enforcers, the firemen. We saw the comparison with the time period in when the novel was written, and post September 11. It is great how the author's work still has great meaning in today's society.
I am responding to Micheal Schudson’s essay titled “America’s Ignorant Voter”. He makes several arguments against whether America having relatively ignorant voters poses a problem to our society, and whether it’s becoming worse over the years. One of the arguments he poses as to why Americans seem so clueless about political matters is due to the complexities of our nation’s political institutions.
“Our Civilization is flinging itself to pieces. Stand back from the centrifuge” (Bradbury, 84). The novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury is a comment on the habit of mankind to destroy itself, only to pop right back up from the ashes. The main character, Guy Montag, represents the parts of mankind that are becoming aware of this, through awareness, change through tragedy and obligation to spread both the former.
William Hogeland did a great job at finding hidden stories that the majority didn’t know about. I wish it was a easier read but the information was told correctly. He indeed completed his point of the book because sometimes the past is lost to us future readers and we need to know all the events our founding Americans did to give us the country we have today. Also the book show the reader where exactly the federal government started taking control and how the people tried to fight for what they thought was an unjust law.
Twelve Angry Men, is a play written by Reginald Rose. The play is about the process of individuals and a court case, which is determining the fate of a teenager. It presents the themes of justice, independence and ignorance. Rose emphasises these three themes through the characters and the dialogue. Justice is the principle of moral rightness or equity. This is shown through juror number eight who isn’t sure whether or not the boy is actually innocent or guilty, but he persists to ask questions and convinces the other jurors to think about the facts first. Independence is shown through both juror number three and ten. They both believe that the defendant is guilty until they both realise that they can not relate there past experiences with the court case. Ignorance is shown throughout all the jurors during the play, it is also brought out through the setting of the play.
... in question are complex,” and “either side of these debates are often well argued” (378). He proposes that we seek understanding from both sides of the aisle, so that way we may have opinions substantiated by fact. As Zinser puts it, “[a]n informed public is the grease that keeps democracy running properly” (364). Democracy is contingent upon the citizens of America being thoroughly informed about important issues and using that information when it is time to make a decision at the voting booth. The media is rampant with false information, radical ideologies, and skewed perspectives that influence our decisions. Therefore, as Americans it is important that we actively seek the information in order to form our own opinions because passive absorption without scrutiny leaves us vulnerable to strong, influential ideologies that may not represent our beliefs and values.
Another controlling method that is diffused through television, radio and written publications; is any reported information about world politics and news. Powerful political groups narrow people’s views of what is going on around them by tainting and twisting information to their own device. They decide what to say and when to say it, revealing as much or little information as desired, in ‘befitting’ instances; thus enabling them to hide information they consider deleterious to themselves, from the public. It also permits them to depict opponents in overly negative terms.
Schools, Teaching, and Learning; Not Good for Everyone Never let going to school and taking classes get in the way of learning. There is more than enough blame to go around regarding the education and preparation for the recent generations of students entering adulthood. Some people, like Michael Moore blame politics on the poor state of education, others like Davis Guggenheim, blame the powerful teachers union putting their own needs before the students. I place the blame squarely at the feet of the parents, students and over all society for the current state of education.
The political culture that defines American politics shows that despite this compromise, America is still very much a democratic society. The very history of the country, a major contributor to the evolution of its political culture, shows a legacy of democracy that reaches from the Declaration of Independence through over two hundred years to today’s society. The formation of the country as a reaction to the tyrannical rule of a monarchy marks the first unique feature of America’s democratic political culture. It was this reactionary mindset that greatly affected many of the decisions over how to set up the new governmental system. A fear of simply creating a new, but just as tyrannic... ...
Television has affected every aspect of life in society, radically changing the way individuals live and interact with the world. However, change is not always for the better, especially the influence of television on political campaigns towards presidency. Since the 1960s, presidential elections in the United States were greatly impacted by television, yet the impact has not been positive. Television allowed the public to have more access to information and gained reassurance to which candidate they chose to vote for. However, the media failed to recognize the importance of elections. Candidates became image based rather than issue based using a “celebrity system” to concern the public with subjects regarding debates (Hart and Trice). Due to “hyperfamiliarity” television turned numerous people away from being interested in debates between candidates (Hart and Trice). Although television had the ability to reach a greater number of people than it did before the Nixon/Kennedy debate, it shortened the attention span of the public, which made the overall process of elections unfair, due to the emphasis on image rather than issue.
Within the article Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice, the author Joan Tronto highlights and critically examines the United States and its democratic lifestyle after the attacks on 9/11 on the World Trade Center and Pentagon and the events after the 2008 financial crisis. Since these events the United States the average citizen is now facing to many demands for them too adequately for their children and themselves. During a set of recent elections examined by Joan Tronto she found that public involvement was at an all-time low by the citizens of the United States. Although political involvement should support us to care more about our surrounds and society but it does not. However, the American democratic process has become more
In the documentary, An Inconvenient Truth, former presidential nominee Al Gore illuminates the detrimental effects of global warming. Throughout the documentary, Gore discusses the scientific opinion on global warming, which at the time was considered to be a taboo, and argues that, though an “inconvenient truth,” global warming is an actual, catastrophic issue. He states that global warming “is not really a political issue, so much as a moral one.” In addition, Gore contends that global warming is human-caused and specifically emphasizes America’s harmful contributions to its catastrophic dangers. As a result, Gore challenges his viewers to take action in joining the efforts to reduce the long term effects of global warming.
In deciphering what constitutes the brilliance of democracy then, we find that it is not citizens’ ability to make informed decisions or an unflawed and subtly manipulated election process, but the unapparent way in which democracy persuades citizens – informed or not - and leaders – corrupt or not – toward working to build better, more prosperous societies.
Rather than being a neutral conduit for the communication of information, the U.S. media plays an intricate role in shaping and controlling political opinions. Media is extremely powerful in the sense that without an adequate functioning media, it is virtually impossible for a sophisticated social structure like the U.S. Government to exist. Henceforth, all known sophisticated social structure, have always dependent upon the media’s ability to socialize. The U.S. government generally will exploit the media, often times manipulating the enormous power of the printed word. Ultimately empowering the U.S. government, strengthening it with the ability to determine and control the popular perception of reality. One way in which government achieves this objective, is by its ability to misuse the media’s ability to set the agenda. Contrary to popular belief, media is in fact an enormous hegemony. In fact, separate independent news organizations relatively do not exist. Rather than creating an independent structured agenda of there own, generally lesser smaller news organizations adapt to a prepared agenda, previously constructed by a higher medium. Based upon this information alone, it is quite apparent that media functions in adherence to the characteristics of a hierarchy. This simply means that media is structured in a way that it operates functioning from top to bottom. This is also identical to the hierarchical nature of the human body, in that from the commands of the brain transferred through the central nervous system, the body responds accordingly. In order for the U.S. government to control and determine the public’s popular perception of reality, the government must shape and oversee the information that the media reports to the existing populous. This particular process of democracy is known and referred to by political scientists as cognitive socialization. However, many of us, who do not adhere to the cushioning of political correctness, refer to it as the propaganda machine. Numerous political scientists consider cognitive socialization to be the most effective form of political socialization. According to theory, cognitive socialization is doctored up information, which is strategically fragmented in such a manipulative manner, that the probability of its rationalization is highly predictable. The manipulative properties of cognitive socialization are so diabolical and Machiavellian in nature, that I consider it to be the ultimate perversion of the democratic process. In all seriousness, numerous intellectuals, and gentleman held in good stature agree, that cognitive socialization is the product of an evil genius.
The main aim of this report is to analyze the impacts of changes in the media concerning the societal and individual view of politics and politicians. The report also describes significant milestones in mass media since the year 1960 and examines the impact of mass media on how people think politically. The report then considers the effect of technological advancements in mass media and the effect on the results of elections. The use of mass media has increased over the last fifty years in that it is a primary medium through which supporters of various campaigners share their ideas and views concerning politicians and different political parties. Through social media, behaviors and performance of several activists have brought