Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of employee motivation on organizational performance
The impact of employee motivation on organizational performance
The impact of employee motivation on organizational performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Employee commitment allows an organisation to grow and be competitive and thus this is very important to determine the performance of employees. Some people tend to think that commitment is another word for motivation but these are two different terms. Commitment makes employees more willing to work and it is said to be the level of connection that employees feels toward the organisation. Indeed it is the psychological attachment to the organisation. They feel that their place is here in that particular organisation and they are keen to continue working for it. The term “commitment” has got various definitions by different organisational scientists. According to Buchanan (1974) most scholars define commitment as being a bond between the employee and the employer. For example Porter et al (1974) defined commitment as the relative strength of the individual’s identification with an involvement in a particular organisation and Mowday et al (1982) identified three characteristics of commitment which are: • A strong desire to remain a member of the organisation • A strong belief in, and acceptance of, the values and goals of the organisation • A readiness to exert considerable effort on behalf of the organisation Meyer and Allen (1991) and Dunham et al (1994) identified three types of commitment which are the affective one, the continuance and the normative commitment. The affective commitment is defined as the emotional attachment, identification and involvement that an employee has with its organisation and goals (Mowday et al, 1997, Meyer & Allen 1993). For example employees who feel like being at home in their place of work get engaged with the organisation because of affective commitment. The continuance commitment is the willingn... ... middle of paper ... ...’s commitment and these are the following: • Fairness: eliminating one’s feelings, prejudices and desires to achieve a proper balance between conflicting interests • Trust: employers must create an environment of trust doing what they say they will do, being consistent, maintaining confidences, being a role model of behavior, encouraging employee involvement, allowing people to make decisions that affect their work, allowing people to make mistakes without fear or ridicule and to learn from mistakes, explaining reasons for major decisions and acting on employees suggestions. • Concern for employees: employees should be regarded as people not as factors of production. Employers should provide job security as far as possible, train and develop employees, be flexible to accommodate employees’ issues, be opened and honest and allow employees to have a life outside work.
... Factors affecting employees’ organizational commitment–a study of banking staff in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam. Journal of Advanced Management Science 2(1), 7-11
With all discrimination aside, what’s important is to show some honest respect, ethics, value, and loyalty to every employee.
In an increasingly competitive market place, businesses having a diverse workforce can further a company's goals. Various ideas and perspectives allow the company to win a competitive edge by differentiating themselves from rivals. The third recommendation is to see employees as assets to the troupe. Employees represent the company by treating directly with customers. If an employee feels important to the society, they will work accordingly with customers. The fourth recommendation is to incorporate ethical principles for employees to comply. A codification of conduct would create a central guide and reference for day-to-day decision making. It will also elucidate the organization's mission, values and rules. Staffing Strategy Chern should incorporate a core work force. Their employees should consist of people who are a regular part of the company and see the importance they play in maintaining the business successful and helping it
06). For any leader to be successful, that leader would need to have the trust of their employees. Without that trust, the employees would not be able to believe in the leader and/or their style of leading or whether they are fair, ethically and predictable. Employees need to know that the priorities of the both the company and the leader will have the best interest of the employees. Communication is an important part of trust. Employees like to know what is happening with the company and how they may be affected. This also tells a lot about the leader, are they willing to let the staff know what is happening or are they secretive. Organizational trust is also important to the employees and leaders play a role in that as they show what they pay attention to, how they use resources, dealing with issues of a critical nature, and how they hire, promote, and employee dismissal (Joseph & Winston, 2005, p. 08). The culture of organizational trust
Employees should know how to address such concerns with confidence and ease. Structure also is important in establishing the ethical rights of employees as it relates to safety and of a professional nature. Job Performance Organizational culture plays an enormous r... ... middle of paper ... ...
What are the single most important characteristic people want to their employees? Reliability, responsible, good attitude? No. The answer is integrity. Employers want to be told the truth. They want people who have a moral compass and who are honest. In a world of spin and branding, and buying and selling, the concept of honesty seems to be dismissed, but it always comes back to bite those who ignore it in the butt. We see in the front pages of newspapers, magazines, and websites who are regularly crowded with stories of the great and the good who lied, stole, and cheated their way to fame, wealth and destruction.
... Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991-1007. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.991
3. Discipline ? Employees will obey their manager command as long as their manager is
Organizational commitment is the strength of an individual’s identification with an organization. There are three kinds of organizational commitment: affective, continuance, and normative. Affective commitment is an employee’s intention to remain in an organization because of a strong desire to do so. Continuance commitment is and employee’s tendency to remain in an organization because he or she cannot afford to leave. Lastly, normative commitment is the perceived obligation to remain in an organization (Nelson & Quick, 2013, pg. 62).
If the organization succeeds then the employees also succeeds. Employees must see the bigger picture and must feel that they are part of the organization and not just a one man show.
The relationship between employer and employees plays a pivotal role in the performance of the organization. Employers and employees have certain responsibilities towards each other which facilitate a fair and productive workplace. Positive work relationships create a cooperative climate with effort towards the same goals. Conflict, on the other hand, is likely to divert attention away from organizational performance.
Additionally, employee satisfaction are directly correlated to employee commitment and the loyalty which again directly related with the business and work productivity (Papazisi, Raidén, and Sheehan, 1995). Smart leaders knows that keeping their employee satisfied and motivated are essential for their organization (Sher, Bakhtiar, Muhammad &Ali, 2010).
yes but the level appears that the level of satisfaction from employees with their place of employment seem to be dropping because of pay and promotion. Pay and Promotion are some of the major factors when an employee becomes unsatisfied with their position at their place of employment. Many employers are expecting more work from employees and are not being valued with more money or a more value based title. This is where Organizational commitment falls in an employee may feel the need to be committed to an organization based on the employee’s attachment to the place of employment. Many places of employment are now trying to see how they can better their place of employment for employees in order for them to be more committed to the organization. At my job we now have employment satisfaction surveys that come out every six months for employees. In these surveys the employee must answer a series of questions pertaining to how they feel about the job and its environment. This is an excellent way for the employees to voice their concerns as well as have the company listen to their concerns. This was also seen in the textbook and explained, Effective commitment is an emotional attachment to the organization and a belief in its values; while she disliked the job for whatever reasons, she did like her coworkers and had formed genuine friendships, so it was harder for her to exit because she had an emotional attachment to the
The buzzword in the global HR arena these days is ‘employee engagement’. Its impact has become so immense that is has become somewhat indispensible in the realm of the business world where operational efficiency and profit earning are the sole endeavour of any company. The questions are often asked regarding the utility of the employee engagement policies that are adopted by the companies especially in this world of cutthroat competition. These policies have been extremely useful one hand for the organisations; on the other hand they have been a failed drastically as effective HR and internal communications function in lot of companies.
Another large debate in the issues and impacts of obesity is the responsibility of employer’s. Especially for those whose obesity comes from a sedentary lifestyle. Or perhaps need the preventative measures of keeping obesity at bay. A hot topic on the rise is whether or not employers should be mandated to give employees a work-out period in their schedule. The employers could offer employee’s incentives for utilizing resources (a company gym, discounted memberships, and dietician, walking a company track) and by using the resources keep costs low. Though initially it could be costly to take on the responsibility to offer extra incentives to employee’s it could offer long term potential savings. (Villareal, Apovian, Kushner, and Klein 2005) Those whose companies offer various programs and actively engage in them express more happiness, productivity, a greater quality of life, and overall better health. Better health allows for employee’s to serve their employers better. They use less sick pay, keep insurance premiums low, and are more likely to be in tune with their daily job. So while the initial cost may be high, the long term financial gain of a happy, healthy, productive team is hard not to invest in!