Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contingency plans due to disaster
Mitigating the impact of disaster
Executive summary disaster recovery options
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contingency plans due to disaster
In order to prepare for a disaster, there are some specific steps that need to be taken to ensure that the least amount of preventable damage and distress is caused. This type of preparation is typically referred to as a disaster plan. In module one, we learned the different components of a disaster plan and why they are all necessary in order to handle a disaster in the best measurable manner. We also learned that when disaster plans are not implemented fully and accurately, how detrimental the outcome can be as the tsunami in 2004 exemplified.
Disaster plans do not just have one component. Instead they have multiple different aspects that all tie in together to assume the safest results. The basis of a disaster plan begins at a local
…show more content…
It has been found that the most successful disaster relief scenarios typically are recovered from one plan of action, instead of multiple ones. Having one plan, that is written very clear and concise leaves less room for error and an easier route to follow. It allows multiple relief teams to remain on the same page, with less room for questioning. If the plan is written clearly, the less misunderstandings there will be and the better the plan will be executed (Alexander 2002). The concept it quite simple and can gain quick …show more content…
Planning for the absolute worst potential can only guarantee positive results and there is always a chance that the disaster can be less devastating as planned. When that takes place, the management teams can recover quickly. Every plan needs a set of processes and those processes are what each member of risk management, law enforcement, government agencies and recovery teams follow depending on their individual roles in the situations. Having this type of instruction for every team allows them to execute their jobs to fullest knowing what they need to
The National response plan outlines four key actions the disaster coordinator should take. They are gaining and maintaining situational awareness, activate and deploy key resources and capabilities, coordinating response actions and demobilizing. Throughout the response it is essential that responders have access to critical information. During the initial response effort the situation is will change rapidly. Situational awareness starts at the incident site. For this reason it is essential that decision makers have access to the right information at the right time. By establishing an Emergency Operations Center (EOC) all key responders are brought ...
Both man-made and natural disasters are often devastating, resource draining and disruptive. Having a basic plan ready for these types of disaster events is key to the success of executing and implementing, as well as assessing the aftermath. There are many different ways to create an emergency operations plan (EOP) to encompass a natural and/or man-made disaster, including following the six stage planning process, collection of information, and identification of threats and hazards. The most important aspect of the US emergency management system in preparing for, mitigating, and responding to man-made and natural disasters is the creation, implementation and assessment of a community’s EOP.
Bissell, R. (2010). Catastrophic Readiness and Response Course, Session 6 – Social and Economic Issues. Accessed at http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/edu/crr.asp
Perry, R. W., & Lindell, M. K. (2007). Disaster Response. In W. L. Waugh, & K. Tiernery, Emergency Management: Principles and Practice for Local Government (pp. 162-163). Washington D.C.: International City/County Management Association.
disaster and who is to preform those steps. With a clear, documented disaster recovery plan in place the risk from a disaster can be minimized. While there is no way to plan for every disaster that could happen, the likely disaster can be planned for and the risk minimize as much as possible. The disaster recovery plan is the documented efforts that IT will perform to minimize the risk of catastrophic failure. This document is a requirement for any IT audit that is performed on the Clinica Tepeyac information systems department.
The major preparedness measures taken include strategic planning for disaster, making changes in procurement procedures, developing a communication plan, and investigating insurance coverage.
The additional principles are identifying the types of emergency response actions that are most likely to be appropriate, addressing the linkage of emergency response to disaster recovery, and providing for training and evaluation of the emergency response organization at all levels. While providing the training and evaluation of the emergency response organizations levels that must be included are individual, team, department, and community (Waugh, 2007, p. 116). Lastly, recognizing that emergency planning is a continuing process is
No communities or states are immune from disasters. A natural or man-made disaster can happen at any time and the impact can be devastating and overwhelming. It can affect citizen’s livelihoods and environment in a matter of second. The government has implemented various types of hazard reduction programs over the past several years to reduce or minimize the loss of life, injuries and property losses caused by the destruction of these disasters.
Emergencies strike when people least expect them. Since emergencies are unpredictable, the one thing that emergency management can focus on to counter the unpredictability of man-made and natural disasters are a plan for possible outcomes. Newman and Clarke (2008) state,” Ironically, responding to attack are the least problematic component of any counterterrorism plan” (p.34). “Planning helps an organization chart a course for the achievement of its goals” (Hill, n.d., para. 1). The purpose of planning provides organizational guidelines, establishes short and long term goals, delegate authority and responsibilities, determines the efficient use of resources, and reduces risks and wasteful activities.
Sometimes one phase of the emergency management tends to overlap of adjacent phase. The concept of “phases” has been used since the 1930’s to help describe, examine, and understand disasters and to help organize the practice of emergency management. In an article titled Reconsidering the Phases of Disaster, David Neal cites different examples of different researchers using five, six, seven, and up to eight phases long before the four phases became the standard. (Neal 1997) This acknowledges that critical activities frequently cover more than one phase, and the boundaries between phases are seldom precise. Most sources also emphasize that important interrelationships exist among all the ph...
There has been a great deal of changes regarding emergency management since the time it was originally started over 30 years ago. Its evolvement has been as a direct result of learning from mistakes and a desire to have a strong process in line to help our nation handle disasters quickly and efficiently. Many people may believe that being prepared is all that it takes to get through a disaster; however, this could not be further form the truth. Preparedness does indeed play a huge role in managing disasters, but what other key factors should we pay attention to?
Disaster Recovery Planning is the critical factor that can prevent headaches or nightmares experienced by an organization in times of disaster. Having a disaster recovery plan marks the difference between organizations that can successfully manage crises with minimal cost, effort and with maximum speed, and those organizations that cannot. By having back-up plans, not only for equipment and network recovery, but also detailed disaster recovery plans that precisely outline what steps each person involved in recovery efforts should undertake, an organization can improve their recovery time and minimize the disrupted time for their normal business functions. Thus it is essential that disaster recovery plans are carefully laid out and carefully updated regularly. Part of the plan should include a system where regular training occurs for network engineers and managers. In the disaster recovery process extra attention should also be paid to training any new employees who will have a critical role in this function. Also, the plan should require having the appropriate people actually practice what they would do to help recover business function should a disaster occur. Some organizations find it helpful to do this on a quarterly or semi-annual basis so that the plan stays current with the organization’s needs.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss potential disasters that could affect a community and cause mass casualties. Further discussion will include who is responsible for the management preparedness, what barriers must be considered and finally this paper will discuss the health care facilities role in emergency supplies and care of the patient in a disaster situation. The Community Communities throughout the country and the world are susceptible to disasters. The environment and location of a community often predisposes a greater susceptibility to the type of disaster. For example, Central Pennsylvania would not be susceptible to an avalanche, however, communities in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado would have increased vulnerability.
Of the four phases of emergency management, mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery, perhaps the place that individuals can make the biggest difference in their own state of resiliency and survival of a disaster is in the preparedness phase. Being prepared before a disaster strikes makes sense yet many people fail to take even simple, precautionary steps to reduce the consequences of destruction and mayhem produced by natural events such as earthquakes, volcanos and tornados (see Paton et al, 2001, Mileti and Peek, 2002; Tierney, 1993, Tierney et al, 2001).
The increase in unpredictable natural disasters events for a decade has led to put the disaster preparedness as a central issue in disaster management. Disaster preparedness reduces the risk of loss lives and injuries and increases a capacity for coping when hazard occurs. Considering the value of the preparatory behavior, governments, local, national and international institutions and non-government organizations made some efforts in promoting disaster preparedness. However, although a number of resources have been expended in an effort to promote behavioural preparedness, a common finding in research on natural disaster is that people fail to take preparation for such disaster events (Paton, 2005; Shaw 2004; Spittal, et.al, 2005; Tierney, 1993; Kenny, 2009; Kapucu, 2008; Coppola and Maloney, 2009). For example, the fact that nearly 91% of Americans live in a moderate to high risk of natural disasters, only 16% take a preparation for natural disaster (Ripley, 2006).