Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Details for the cold war introduction
Short note on cold war
Short note on cold war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Details for the cold war introduction
Atomic Blonde is a fast-paced, female-led action spy thriller that brings audiences into the world of the late Cold War with double-crossing, and heart-racing action scenes. With its reliance on visual aesthetics, neon lights, and a quintessential 1980’s soundtrack, it has all the makings for a glitzy box office winner, a title it claimed in summer 2017. Though, the movie also details the political, social and cultural turmoil of the time. From subtle news reports broadcasted on TV in the background, to scenes featuring protests, Atomic Blonde embodies the close of the Cold War with production choices and content. The Cold War was a very volatile time for the entire world, especially the major intelligence agencies, the CIA, MI6, and the KGB. Atomic Blonde follows a stoic, cool, and experienced MI6 officer Lorraine Broughton as …show more content…
The movie best speaks to society through news reports Broughton watches, as she sits in her hotel room, the news is Berlin is dedicated to The Wall and the tensions threatening to bring it down. The reporter speaks of civil disobedience and unrest, “East Berlin’s youth leader shout out their protests through tear gas and water cannons,” the police retaliate, “and there are numerous reports of police beating peaceful demonstrators with batons.” Later that evening we see the news again, proclaiming that “Communist Party officials are struggling to maintain order.” The background noise is a mess of uproar and a sea of signs. Later in the movie, the audience watches an actual protest, as the characters engage. People chant, throwing their fists in the air, others brandish signs, some reading, “Wir fordern freie Wahlen” or “Freie Wahlen müssen sein,” their carriers demanding free elections and the ability to choose their own government. The audience now experiences the discontent up close, the blatant unrest of citizens combating nearly 30 years of
For the unit two we watched two movies that were made during the GDR period. One of them, Berlin- Corner Schonhauser, was filmed before the wall and the second movie, The Rabbit is Me, was filmed after the wall. Both films were accepted while they were made, but at the end, they were both banned. The general idea is, that as much as these two movies tried to follow the GDR’s rule during the freeze time, but still they were trying to show a realistic socialist society, and so that cause the movies to be banned. Life before the Berlin wall was a little different than the life after the wall and so that’s the reason that these two movies are different than each other, while Berlin- Corner Schonhauser is mostly showing young generation and their
Stanley Kubrick’s sexual parody, Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, illustrates an unfathomed nuclear catastrophe. Released in the midst of the Cold War, this 1964 film satirizes the heightened tensions between America and Russia. Many sexual insinuations are implemented to ridicule the serious issue of a global nuclear holocaust, in an effort to countervail the terror that plagued America at that time. Organizing principles, such as Kubrick’s blunt political attitudes about the absurdity of war and the satirical genre, are echoed by the film style of his anti-war black comedy, Dr. Strangelove.
The first thing about this film that caught my eye from a sociological perspective is that the society in the film is not depicted as a “perfect society” as most films do, instead it shows the real conflicts that society had back then with certain subjects. The film shows us the prejudices, and misconceptions that people had about things like sex, and homosexuality at the time.
As the grievances are read down the list, the audience can interpret them as hard hitting points; read with pressing emotion. At this point, the grievances would then climax, putting special emphasis on the change from ‘He has’ to ‘He is’. This mechanism must be used in combination with the presentation of the information to produce the optimal effect. With this in use, it is not only important to rally the people, as previously described, but to affirm that this is the only possible solution. Near the end of the document, there is a reassurance given to the audience. “In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury” This would discount any arguments against those who believe a rebellion would be too disruptive and see a continued diplomatic stance as the
"The Role of Civil Disobedience in Democracy." Civil Liberties Monitoring Project. Web. 01 Oct. 2011. .
Protests have long been a way for people to display their difference in opinion and gain support. One of the many protests against the war that had a powerful effect on public opini...
All societies will endure times of great trouble where people suffer, and in that suffering, discontent will give birth to voices offering a solution. While some, holding the most genuine motives, will whole heartedly rise to the challenge, others will seem parallel in these actions, but will refuse to take responsibility for any attributions made to the system, doing so in a reckless prosecution towards power. Before establishing a solution, one must find a scapegoat, a targeted group of people, to condemn. This is followed by aggressive name calling, crude insulting, and attacks on the personal rights of citizens. If name calling doesn’t work, a violent revolution will materialize, in which there will be a bloody outcome with many fatalities.
The seriousness is enough to make you lose faith in humanity for a second, but catch your attention and evoke deep and reflection thought into the truth that goes on in the part of society that is unknowingly ignored by the population because it gets constantly overshadowed by media and the government. More importantly, the film reminds us that progress will move forward only when those at the top of authority realize they need to relate with and answer to the people who want change, answer to the voices of people those broken, traumatized, who truly need
Two ways that citizens react to systems of oppression are by being a bystander or upstander. Citizens represent the role of a bystander by passively watching oppression, as demonstrated by Alex from Forbidden City and the narrator from “The Hangman”. An upstander shows that he or she believes in a cause by taking action against some type of oppression, sometimes risking their lives in the process. Alex eventually transitions into an upstander, and the French Woman from “Pigeon” also shows the characteristics of an upstander. In the case of Forbidden City by William Bell, the Chinese student demonstrators are victimized by the corrupt Chinese government, who are the oppressors in the novel. Alex’s transition between roles in Forbidden
The following essay will attempt to evaluate the approach taken by Dworkin and Habermas on their views of civil disobedience. The two main pieces of literature referred to will be Dworkin?s paper on 'Civil Disobedience and Nuclear Protest?' and Habermas's paper on 'Civil Disobedience: Litmus Test for the Democratic Constitutional State.' An outline of both Dworkin's and Habermas's approach will be given , further discussion will then focus on a reflective evaluation of these approaches. Firstly though, it is worth commenting on civil disobedience in a more general context. Most would agree that civil disobedience is a 'vital and protected form of political communication in modern constitutional democracies' and further the 'civil disobedience has a legitimate if informal place in the political culture of the community.' Civil disobedience can basically be broken down into two methods, either intentionally violating the law and thus incurring arrest (persuasive), or using the power of the masses to make prosecution too costly to pursue (non persuasive).
But the film actually made me recall a question that I always had: to what extent can we, as somewhere who are not involved in the events, criticize people, especially the wrongdoers, who did partake in the history? As people from the 21st century, we know that slavery is unjust and horrible because we were raised in a society where love and peace were honored. When I questioned myself what would I do if I were Edwin Epps, Marry Epps, or William Ford, I began to question myself how much can I criticize them people when the cruelty was norm, and all those people did really was to follow the norm. Although it would be righteous and courageous to stand up for the blacks, not everyone is all courageous and willing to challenge the society. The film reminded me to have my own judgment and not to blindly follow what everyone else consider to be the norm. This film also made me wonder: when it is many years from now, how much of the social norm today would be considered to be cruel and
We wage war against the corrupt parliamentary administration whereby men are appointed to posts by favor of the party without regard to character and fitness. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. If it should not be possible to feed the whole population, then aliens (non-citizens) must be expelled from the Reich.
The film tells the story of a deranged United States Air Force general who orders a first strike nuclear attack on the Soviet Union. United States Air Force Brigadier General Jack D. Ripper who was the commander of Burpelson Air Force Base, launches a planed nuclear attack on the Soviet Union via his nuclear-armed B-52 fighter jets, which were holding at their fail-safe points, to move into Soviet airspace, based upon a twisted paranoia that the communist party was contaminating “our precious bodily fluids”. The movie follows the course of events proceeding General Jack D. Ripper’s ordered attack.
Hence, the demands of populist movement are “unified and stabilized not merely by their opposition to the status quo, but also by the emergence of an empty signifier, a concept or name (“freedom,” “Perón”) that loses its own specificity as it stands in for the other specific demands to which it is seen as equivalent.” Therefore, the opposition between the form and content serves nothing more but as a means of labeling that
Good evening Sevasti, I really enjoyed your post because it was about an era that I am very interested in. I have never read Dorothy Parker's "Big Blonde", but from what you have explained it sounds like a very intriguing read that can be influential for this class. Ever since I was a kid I have always loved everything about the roaring '20's and people tend to forget the life women actually had to live during this time. Hazel was not wrong for believing that marriage would be the key to life because that level of thinking was ingrained into them as children. This is a great example of a character who is "defined by obstacles in life" (Lyama) because she let's marriage, drinking and death define who she is and allows them to grow into these enormous