Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media influence on public opinion
Media influence on public opinion
Media influence in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Kinsey, a film written and directed by Bill Condon, chronicles the story of well renowned human sexuality researcher Alfred Kinsey, and his struggles of being the first to study what was considered a taboo subject back in that time period. The film does a great job of not only telling his story, but it also integrating real theories from psychology and sociology. The first thing about this film that caught my eye from a sociological perspective is that the society in the film is not depicted as a “perfect society” as most films do, instead it shows the real conflicts that society had back then with certain subjects. The film shows us the prejudices, and misconceptions that people had about things like sex, and homosexuality at the time. The
structural-functional perspective is the first of the three sociological theories that I saw in this film. At the beginning of the film society is working together, just like the structural-functional approach states, and it is fine for a majority of the society to have such subjects like sex, and homosexuality that they don't talk about, but it is still an underlying problem that is being ignored. This can be considered as a latent function, because the consequences of letting such subjects go ignored for so long would go unnoticed and be hidden. Kinsey sees this as a problem and decided to study human sexuality, something he feels as if it should be common knowledge for everyone, turning a taboo subject into everyday knowledge. The conflict perspective comes into play once Kinsey starts his research. There’s two sides of society working against each other: those who want to know more about human sexuality, and those who insist it remains a subject that is not discussed. At this point in time, the side that wants it to remain as a undiscussed subject has more power, but as the film goes on, Kinsey’s side slowly starts to gain more power as human sexuality starts to become less of a taboo subject. The symbolic-interaction perspective can be seen in certain situation throughout the film. This perspective states that social interaction helps shape our identity or sense of self. This is shown when Kinsey and his team are talking to their volunteers and taking their sex history. As the volunteers talk more about sex, they seem to get more comfortable with it, and as they open up, they realize their true self when it comes to their sexuality. This can be seen in scenes in the movie like the scene when Kinsey is taking his dad’s sex history, or near the end of the film in another scene with an older homosexual woman that was finally okay with who she truly is after she saw Kinsey’s work. Overall, I thought it was a great film that was very well done. I knew little of Kinsey before watching the film, and the film was very informative about who he was and what he did. It did a great job of telling his story, and everything he brought to the world of human sexuality. The film also had great psychological, and sociological aspect to it, and if you knew what to look for, it makes the film that much more enjoyable.
Overall the film was a very informative film for a more homophobic audience. The content was relatable and connected well with the information and discussions that have been within our society for a long time. It was a well-done film that really questions the homophobic opinions and while this is still a very real debate in today’s society the film does a great job at arguing the homophobic opinions.
I think all of these topics relate to the movie in many different ways. Most of my research backed my claims and opinions I had in this time period. One thing I did not know was that movies could be recorded that clear in 1968. I think this movie brings a bunch of problems to light. One example is Harry, he is cowardly and is despised by even his own wife. He bullies other people like Tom or Helen into agreeing with him. Once he is challenged by Ben, chaos ensues. They both cannot get along and I think that applies to society today. This movie also makes the lead role an African American Male. This was an unordinary thing to do in 1968 because racism was still a big problem. Today we are also dealing with racial inequality throughout the world. These were just two examples, I’m sure there are many more relatable things from “Night of the Living Dead” and 2017. In conclusion, I think this essay broadened my ideas while solidifying them with this time
This movie is a wonderful production starting from 1960 and ending in 1969 covering all the different things that occurred during this unbelievable decade. The movie takes place in many different areas starring two main families; a very suburban, white family who were excepting of blacks, and a very positive black family trying to push black rights in Mississippi. The movie portrayed many historical events while also including the families and how the two were intertwined. These families were very different, yet so much alike, they both portrayed what to me the whole ‘message’ of the movie was. Although everyone was so different they all faced such drastic decisions and issues that affected everyone in so many different ways. It wasn’t like one person’s pain was easier to handle than another is that’s like saying Vietnam was harder on those men than on the men that stood for black rights or vice versa, everyone faced these equally hard issues. So it seemed everyone was very emotionally involved. In fact our whole country was very involved in president elections and campaigns against the war, it seemed everyone really cared.
Masters and Johnson were a pioneering team in the field of human sexuality, both in the domains of research and therapy. William Howell Masters, a gynecologist, was born in Cleveland, Ohio in 1915. Virginia Eshelman Johnson, a psychologist, was born in Springfield, Montana in 1925. To fully appreciate their contribution, it is necessary to see their work in historic context. In 1948, Alfred C. Kinsey and his co-workers, responding to a request by female students at Indiana University for more information on human sexual behavior, published the book Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. They followed this five years later with Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. These books began a revolution in social awareness of and public attention given to human sexuality. At the time, public morality severely restricted open discussion of sexuality as a human characteristic, and specific sexual practices, especially sexual behaviors that did not lead to procreation. Kinsey's books, which among other things reported findings on the frequency of various sexual practices including homosexuality, caused a furor. Some people felt that the study of sexual behavior would undermine the family structure and damage American society. It was in this climate - one of incipient efforts to break through the denial of human sexuality and considerable resistance to these efforts - that Masters and Johnson began their work. Their primary contribution has been to help define sexuality as a healthy human trait and the experience of great pleasure and deep intimacy during sex as socially acceptable goals. As a physician interested in the nature of sexuality and the sexual experience, William Masters wanted to conduct research that would lead to an objective understanding of these topics. In 1957, he hired Virgina Johnson as a research assistant to begin this research issue. Together they developed polygraph-like instruments that were designed to measure human sexual response. Using these tools, Masters and Johnson initiated a project that ultimately included direct laboratory observation and measurement of 700 men and women while they were having intercourse or masturbating. Based on the data collected in this study, they co-authored the book Human Sexual Response in 1966. In this book, they identify and describe four phases in the human sexual response cycle : excitement, plateau, orgasm, and resolution. By this point in time, the generally repressive attitude toward sexuality was beginning to lift and the book found a ready audience.
Although, it is proven difficult to completely change your point of view from the society you are brought up in. The characters in this film go through a lot of self-reevaluation to find their place in society, as well as a reevaluation of their initial prejudicial
Every film can be related back to socially significant issues that occurred during the time it was released. It’s a snapshot of the issues during that time period. Film is not created in a vacuum. As described in our textbook, film “Conveys “the temper of an age of a nation” as well as that of the artists who produces it” (Belton 22). Films tend to reflect current society, country ideals or beliefs in order for the audience to relate. Some of those techniques used include, the American dream, family, corruption, divorce, and crime. If a director decides not include current social issues than it becomes harder for an audience to relate to the film because they will not be able to connect to the characters and get into their shoes. One film that encompasses all of these current social issues is American Hustle (David O. Russell, 2013). This film is a melodrama because of the context and social issues this film deals with. American Hustle has a social significance to today’s current culture, society, beliefs and social issues through the use of the American dream, corruption, divorce, crime and family.
I also praise how the beginning of the movie starts off with the rules and the history of the society being shown in words on the screen. I found it helped me understand how the society functions. The history of the society was extremely helpful as the movie itself explains it later in the movie. Some of the rules included, use precise language, wear your assigned clothing, take your morning medication, obey the curfew, and never
It shows the need for people to conform to societal expectations to survive and thrive in society. It also shows the consequences of going against those expectations to purse matters of the heart, whether that is helping a condemned man or trying to keep your family from being taken away. Fighting these societal expectations puts a target on these people’s backs, which is why so many people decide to just succumb to these expectations, which is much easier on these
I am not used to watch those types of scenes in movies; especially watching those types of scenes in a room full of strangers. Also, I felt that Kinsey was very open to seek for help from an expert in regards of his sexual difficulties with his wife; however, he was hesitant to even mention the side of his penis. I think it was interesting how Kinsey’s lock of knowledge about sex intrigue him to do researches and experiments of why sex was a topic that many people were not open to talk about. However, I think Kinsey went too far to reach his goal. Seeing Kinsey kissing with another man was an awkward moment, I did not see that coming. I think his desire to find out what people experience in their sexual encounters, was a motive why Kinsey decided to sleep with a man. I am against same sex encounters due to my religion beliefs, and watching Kinsey with another man was not a pleasant experience. I would like to state that I do not dislike gays or lesbians; however, I do not approve their sexual
it parallels present day society in the U.S. in many ways. Yet at the same time,
From birth, one's sexuality is shaped by society. Cultures institute behaviors that are to be seen as the societal norms, which work to constantly reinforce societal expectations of how genders should act in relation to one another. Although some may argue that one's sexuality is an innate characteristic resulting from genetic makeup, there is a large amount of evidence pointing to its social construction instead. Through the power differences between males and females, established gender roles, and drastic economic shifts, society establishes sexuality and reinforces the behaviors that are expected of its citizens.
...ealth, statute and capitalism were recurring themes that were made prevalent because I believe that those types of values are not values that should trouble a relationship. The media and movies will often try to enforce these challenging views. These views will always be perceived as natural values rather than cultural, especially in today’s society. Although this movie did exploit a lot of stereotypical themes, I did like that the movie concluded with a non-stereotypical image which was a Allie, a female, being the breadwinner, marrying Noah, a man that is not affiliated with wealth taking care of her and the life they provided equally together. Rather than the stereotypical image of a man, being the bread-winner and the women taking care of him. The film went against the view of a stereotypical society, especially during that time period and I admired that.
It seemed to focus on sexuality in this era whereas the book was a timeline of the battle of the sexes. The video was very detailed and gave an inside look at what the sexes are really looking for in their partner. There are 2 types of women that men are looking for in women. One group is the women they want to have sex with and the other group is the group they want to date and have a relationship with. With the women there was only one thing, they are looking more for security and a man to have a long term relationship
The timing of this film was a significant factor in the story line. In the middle of the Great Depression unemployment and poverty were a major
In many parts of America, people would find it impossible to believe that this film is depicting real events happening in 2008. Yet in other parts, where the under-current of racism is palpable even if not manifested as overtly as at Charleston High in Mississippi, minorities will be able to relate to their own experiences of being made to feel different and unwelcome in many subtle ways every single day. It was shocking to find out this was still happening in this day and age, I rarely witness to any kind of cruelty or racism so to find out that this was a normal thing in Charleston, Mississippi. This was appalling to say the least. Teens are dealing with issues that a teen shouldn’t even be bothered to deal with. The white student were put in a situation where they either defy their parents and do what’s right, or go along with what they said and fall in the line of ignorance. The movie really showed just who was willing to fight for what’s right and who were too scared to break questionable traditions.