Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of censorship
Negative effects of censorship
Negative effects of censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of censorship
I. All Literature should be publiclly accessible, as well as in schools
A. First Digital Information
1. Include Teenink.com information "Against Banning Books"
2.Elborate on "Against Banning Book", including classic banned books
B. Second Digital Information
1. Include theodysseyonline.com "Why We Should Never Ban Book"
2. Relate to the Article with personal experiences at school, quoting the article
II. Banning books in general denies our Youth to a narrow mindset with 'proper' and 'acceptable' according to overprotective adults
.
A. First Digital Information
1. Include LA Times "Tennessee Mother complains about Henrietta Lacks"
2. Use quotes of mother and use satire, poke fun
B. Second Digital Information
1. Present Information from Gawker.com "Parent calls cop to stop kids from handing out banned book"
…show more content…
2.
Again, use quotes from the article and use Satire. Use Personal thoughts on over protective Mothers and 'shielding' children.
III. 'Controversial' topics such as past or current cultural controversies hould be shown in books
A. First Print Information
1. Begin with excerpts from Unclean Lips: Obscenity, Jews, and American Culture
2. Go along with how said information should be made available to the public
B. Second Print Information
1. Finish off the last bit of provided information with excerpts from Banned in the Media: A Reference Guide to Censorship in the Press, Motion Pictures, Broadcasting, and the Internet
2. Point out US Bans on books as well as landmark incidents in books that are banned and should be exposed to the public to never forget these tragedies
Conclusion:
All in all, Books should be made and not censored just for it's 'vulgarity' or 'socially obscenity' they should be written, manufactured, just like any regular book. Without them, important values and information could not be available for future
generations.
She starts her article by describing her first contact with censorship and continues to talk about her experiences as an author with writing her own books being barred. She takes account of her personal views on how to handle topics people feel should be forbidden from children. She also adds that books should open up conversation between parents and their children. Blume states that we should not let fear be a deciding factor on what is right or wrong but rather be informed and educated about the things we fear. She also said , if applied, censorship is a personal choice and government should not decide what is suitable and what is not suitable for everyone else’s children.
...ain groups consider books to be immoral does not mean they need to be pulled from the shelves. Censoring is acceptable for the youth, but there is an age when we all grow up and are able to handle books with explicit content.
...etter than ignorance. Book censorship should not limit the amount of knowledge a child can receive, instead, books should be used to benefit children in their education and future career.
Foerstel, Herbert N. Banned in the U.S.A.: a Reference Guide to Book Censorship in Schools and Public Libraries. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1994. Print.
Number one, as I said: quality of information. Number two: leisure to digest. And number three: the right to carry out actions based on what we learned from the interaction of the first two”(84-85). Books are where people get their information from, banning books basically means the censorship of information.
Lastly, there is censorship that involves someone who is part of an organized campaign, whether of a local or national group, and who goes in ready for a fight and wants to make a broader political point” (Miner 1998). Although there are many other ways that a piece of literature could get censored, most censored works are asked to be removed from classrooms and school libraries. There are four motivational factors that may lie behind a censor’s actions. Those factors include family values, religion, political views, and minority rights.... ... middle of paper ... ...2003.
Books are banned for many reasons but more times than not it is because of the sensitive information found within the novel that agitates the reader. As long as people have been able to develop their own opinions, others have sought to prevent them from sharing. At some point in time, every idea has ultimately become objectionable to someone. The most frequently challenged and most visible targets of such objection are the very books found in classrooms and public libraries. These controversial novels teach lessons that sometimes can be very sensitive to some but there is much more to challenged books than a controversial topic. What lies within these pages is a wealth of knowledge, such as new perspectives for readers, twisting plots, and expressions that are found nowhere else. For example, To Kill A Mockingbird, contains references to rape, racial content, and profanity that have caused many to challenge the novel in the first place. The book was banned from countless
People should be allowed to read whatever they want to read, even if it is a touchy subject to someone else. Although some people mainly believe in the banning of books due to explicit content, it actually causes a negative effect on people and children. Not only does it take away the people’s first amendment rights, but it also shelters children from real life situations that might affect their future. Banning books is unconstitutional and shelters children.
Books have been banned/censored throughout history. For example, the Catholic Church created the Index of Banned Books in the 1500s. The goal of the Index was to prevent the general population from reading books that went contrary to the Church’s teachings. Some of Galileo’s books were in this list. Anyone caught reading or selling these books was severely punished, tortured, or even killed. 500 years later, however, book banning still occurs. There are hundreds of books being challenged every year in the United States, for various reasons. Many of these reasons are understandable, such as preventing mature content (eg. profanity, violence, obscenity) from reaching young people. However, other reasons are quite irrational. For example, the Harry Potter series was removed from some school libraries because parents believed it promoted witchcraft. A single, precise reason behind book banning, however, is unclear. Furthermore, many important American classics are being banned, often for minor reasons such as profanity. Why is it that we ban books that teach valuable lessons? Is it because censors are simply trying to protect children from inappropriate content? Or are governments trying to suppress unwanted ideas? Books should not be banned because book censorship is unnecessary, limits knowledge, and violates the fundamental principles of this country.
There are many reasons behind book banning and what it stands for, that make a case for book censorship. One main advantage of book banning is that it is protecting children from inappropriate content. A book is usually banned because it contains material that is deemed unfit for minors. Most parents and schools do n...
Censorship in School Libraries The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional.
Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database. This article addresses some of the reasons that censors attempt to remove books from the curriculum: Many censors feel that works are not age appropriate for students. Staff, Wire Reports. (2002 October 3). Book banning spans the globe.
When controversial topics are mentioned, literature is probably not the first, or most pressing, one that comes to mind. But books can and have been highly controversial ground for schools, libraries, and governments around the world and throughout history. Literature successfully pushes boundaries and comfort levels and has done so since the beginning of printed texts. Lots of sources agree that, “Books that span all eras and topics and are aimed at the young and the old are frequently objected to and challenged by many” (Olson 1). Because of this, on all levels, books are banned yearly because of content and language. However, in a highly technological and digital world, book banning is not an effective way to safeguard the minds of the young.
The majority of students these days do not read books on a daily basis. But the proud few that do will know about the banned books. An example of a banned book would be Speak. The book should not have been banned for young adults in high school or adults outside of school. The book has reasons why it should not be banned.
What do books like Harry Potter, looking for Alaska, and The Hunger Games all have in common? These books have all been heavily challenged by the banned book committee. Children in schools face the problem that reading material is slowly becoming a list of what not to read. Parents fear the topics written in some books are things that children shouldn’t face at that moment. The world is slowly cutting out important pieces of literature to protect young people from seeing the brutality around them. Banning books should stop, because we are only harming the creativity that is born within a student when they read.