Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Television impact on society
Influence of television on society
Television impact on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Importance of Censorship
As new technologies evolve and become a part of our daily lives, so do television shows and what people are allowed to view on a regular basis. Censorship, a word that seems to be causing quite some controversy over certain people may not be such a bad idea. As America has seen, a countless amount of people have been known to complain about censorship on television. Although this seems to be a problem to some, maybe the real question to be asked is, is there enough censorship of television? Many families agree that certain rated R movies should not be shown to young children and only certain shows
should be censored to an extent, yet they do not see the significant effect that regular television shows really have on their children.As a child grows, more and more statistics are proving that they are being exposed to too many shows that should be censored. Many studies have concluded that young children are most affected by what they see on television (Dritz, Russel 1996). For example, a child that watches a cartoon with a lot
of violence or tunes into their parents favorite soap opera might find an increasingly amount of exposure to violent acts and sexual content. Children are very vulnerable to such influences and often do not know the difference between right and wrong and the difference between reality and fantasy (Dritz, Russel 1996). As the years go on and television seems to be too censored to most, studies have continued to prove the increasing numbers of children associated with violence and sexual behavior. Although a seemingly older statistic, the Neilson Index averaged American children to watch 18,000 television murders before he or she graduated from high school (Tucker, Larry A. 1988). Could this be a reason for an increasing amount of murders and violent acts among children today?
During the 1960’s, America’s solution to the growing population of mentally ill citizens was to relocate these individuals into mental state institutions. While the thought of isolating mentally ill patients from the rest of society in order to focus on their treatment and rehabilitation sounded like a smart idea, the outcome only left patients more traumatized. These mental hospitals and state institutions were largely filled with corrupt, unknowledgeable, and abusive staff members in an unregulated environment. The story of Lucy Winer, a woman who personally endured these horrors during her time at Long Island’s Kings Park State Hospital, explores the terrific legacy of the mental state hospital system. Ultimately, Lucy’s documentary, Kings
Pan, Deanna. "TIMELINE: Deinstitutionalization And Its Consequences." Mother Jones. N.p., 29 Apr. 2013. Web. 01 Dec. 2013.
Harrison, Erica. "Homelessness Among the Seriously Mentally Ill: What We Can Do to Help." Clarityhumanservices.com. N.p., 5 Mar. 2013. Web. 13 Nov. 2013.
A very debatable question arises when analyzing this, and the upsurge of homelessness. Is the increase of homelessness due to deinstitutionalization? I believe that homelessness is not a result of deinstitutionalization, but rather in the way it has been implemented. Approximately 20-25% of the single adult homeless population suffers from some form of severe and persistent mental illness (Website 2). According to the Federal Task Force on Homelessness and Severe Mental Illness, only 5-7% of the mentally ill homeless need to be institutionalized (Website 2). A majority of mentally ill can live within the community with the appropriate supportive housing options (Website 2). That is where the problem lies. The mentally ill individuals, who have been dependent on all aspects of an institution, are being thrown into a community with little help or guidance. The importance of the distribution of psychoactive medication and financial support were perceived, but the significance of helping to create a community status role for the mentally ill was overlooked. Once this became apparent, community mental health centers were very resistant to providing services for them. States were also extremely reluctant to distribute funds for these community-based servi...
Dorothea Dix, in 1841, began to lobby to move inmates with mental illness out of the jail system, which was not suited for them, and into an asylum. Within a short amount of time, she was successful in her mission. Many mentally ill were moved into hospitals which were able to treat their specific needs better than the jail system was able to. But the problem resurfaced again, this time in a different form. The mental health facilities were being to become overcrowded and abusive their patients. This is when the thinking changed to move the mentally ill out of asylums and into more of a community setting facility. This movement was called deinstitutionalization and was popular in the 1950’ and 1960’s. Its goal was to replace the psychiatric hospitals which required long stays and were often overpopulated, with community mental health services which were less isolated. It accomplished this by releasing many patients and thus reducing the population size and helping the patients become less dependent by shorting stays and enforcing positive behaviors.
Stephey, M.J. "De-Criminalizing Mental Illness." TIME.com. N.p., 8 Aug. 2007. Web. 12 Dec. 2013. .
Devlin, Hannah. "Don't Let The Forces Of Unreason Stop Research; Scientists Should Be Braver In Defending Animal Experiments And Open Up Their Labs Series: Editorial; Opinion, Columns." Times of London 7, 07 2013,: n. pag. eLibrary. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
These facilities provided “custodial care”, meaning they served as supervised shelter or confinement, rather than a source of effective treatment (Chow & Priebe, 2013; Glazer, 1992). Conditions were unfavorable and not much was being done to alleviate the state of the mentally ill. After much pressure from social activists to combat the issue of the poor living conditions of the mentally ill, the United States government eventually provided land and funding for the establishment of over 30 state psychiatric hospitals by the end of the 19th century (Grob, 1994; Unite for Sight, n.d.). Under this system of institutional care, the mentally ill could receive care and treatment from professional staff in a more structured environment, which seemed more promising than previous solutions. However, many of these institutions were underfunded, overcrowded, and operating with inadequate staff, leaving room for poor living conditions, the abuse of patients, and frequent human rights violations (Chow & Priebe, 2013; Dowdall, 1999; Unite for Sight, nd.). These factors, combined with the development of psychiatric drugs between the 1930’s and the 1950’s, drove the movement towards deinstitutionalization (Dowdall, 1999; Smoyak,
Alvin Mushkatel, Subhrajit Guhathakurta, Jackie Thompson, Kathy Thomas, and Michael Franczak (2009) explored the quality of life of people who have serious mental illness, who where homeless within the metropolitan Phoenix area. In the experiment, two programs that were looked at were Supportive Housing (SL) and the Supervised Assisted Living (SIL) programs (Mushkatel, Guhathakurta, Thompson, Thomas, & Franczak, 2009). The study looked at different factors “such as neighborhood racial composition, incomes, housing tenure and concentrations of other subsidized housing” (Mushkatel, Guhathakurta, Thompson, Thomas, & Franczak, 2009, para. 1) and how it impacted the lives of people with severe mental illness. In 1997, “deinstitutionalization had resulted in 2.2 million severely mentally ill patients without supportive psychiatric services” (Mushkatel, Guhathakurta, Thompson, Thomas, & Franczak, 2009, para 3) and many people with serious mental illness became hom...
In any particular year, about 26.2 percent of adults in the United States have a detectable mental illness (“The Numbers”). Unfortunately, not enough hospital beds and places to stay are available for all of those people who need hospital care, so hospitals must move people out to make room for new patients. The space for mentally ill patients has always been low, but it has dramatically dropped in the past few decades. A movement involving deinstitutionalization occurred in 1965, and was advanced by society’s worries about civil liberties of patients. Courts then decided to regulate the amount of patie...
According to Cornish et al., (2014), “A significant ethical consideration for group counselors is balancing the two components of beneficence and nonmaleficence” (p. 590). This denote the ethical criticism that group leaders and counselors may face when deciding in helping those with whom they work (beneficence) and to do no harm (nonmaleficence) can take a complex form in a group counseling setting (Cornish et al., 2014, p. 570). The complex ethical dilemma present itself when doing morally was right for one client might cause detriment to another client in the group
Tackling censorship is much more important than it appears to be at the surface; taking down censorship would help preserve the expression of thought. It would help preserve the right to listen to the unaltered forms of everything. Most importantly, it would help preserve the rapidly weakening basic right of speech. Censorship has always altered the lives of many people, whether they know it or not. People are constantly exposed to the censored version of entertainment.
Television violence is also a cause of both violent and aggressive behavior in teenage boys. According to the evidence in a study done by Turner, Hesse, and Peterson-Lewis, it was concluded that watching television violence had a long-term increase in aggression in boys (Hough 1). In addition to this study, Dr. William A. Belson evaluated fifteen hundred boys, aged thirteen to sixteen years, and he determined that boys with heavy television exposure are more likely to commit violent acts than other boys (Langone 51). In Belson’s study, he discovered that the effect of each violent act on television was collective, and over time, Belson discovered that the boys engaged in many aggressive acts, including painting graffiti, breaking windows, aggressive play, swearing, and threatening other boys with violence (Kinnear 26).
Censorship is an important and essential part of television. Without the presence of censorship television would be unsuitable for our younger viewers because censorship helps to filter out the appearances of nudity, real life violence, the use of profanity and other obscene gestures during the youth viewing hours. However, during the prime time viewing hours it?s a different story. The method the television stations use is a mere waste of time and money because a little symbol in the corner of the screen is not going to prevent a child from watching the program. The only way this method can work is if the parents/guardian is there to change the channel but let?s be realistic, how many parents/guardians actuarially have the time to monitor everything there children watch. So most children do end up viewing these programs anyway, and whether we like it o...
Media has become a very powerful tool. The combination between television, internet and videogames and more have blended in with many of our life styles despite how different we are. But at the same time there are many exposures by the media that shouldn’t be out there, causing young people to behave negatively. Many younger kids get their influence from television programs, such as violent cartoons, music videos, and movies. The content and language used in these media categories can cause a child or teen to use the same kind of language against another teen, an elder, and event their parent. This can result in a children using foul language against their own parent. Therefore, media shown during the day time should be censored to minimize the exposure young kids have to explicated co...