Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Aristotle and Epictetus view on human happiness
Aristotle and Epictetus view on human happiness
Aristotle and Epictetus view on human happiness
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Aristotle and Epictetus view on human happiness
Every person in the world wants to be happy and what makes us happy? Well that would be pleasure. Pleasure is a feeling of happiness and satisfaction physically through our body and mentality in our mind. Everyone in the world will do anything for pleasure no matter what it is. But should every pleasure we seek be desired because not everything is free, but comes with a price? Is pleasure going to be our most important goal in life? Well to answer those questions, you should read Letter to Herodotus by Epicurus, who is a philosopher, and maybe he could answer that question. Epicurus will tell us how to live a full and successful life. Epicurus made Epicureanism where we will learn the important of pleasure and the decision that we made that will lead to happiness or the destruction of …show more content…
your life. What is Epicureanism? Epicureanism is to life a blessedly life with pleasure as our main goal for happiness and to not fear god or death because it will give us a painful and unhappy life. One of Epicureanism ideas is the fear we have with god and his divine punishments are pointed because all the fear will lead our lives with despair. Epicurus says, “First, believe that god is an indestructible and blessed animal, in accordance with the general conception of god commonly held, and do not ascribe to god anything foreign to his indestructibility or repugnant to his blessedness.” (123). Epicurus believes that there is a god or a higher being that is perfect and eternal. God is a perfect being and in the state of perfect happiness and god will not involve himself with human affairs because if he does get involve then he is not god but an imperfect being like a human being. So there is no reason to fear the divine punishment from god because living in fear will only make life unhappy. Another idea of Epicureanism is to not fear about death for it will make our lives full of unhappiness. Epicurus says that we should not live in fear of death because there is nothing to be afraid because it is just one of our senses. But he wants us to live with pleasure because it is innate good and it is the best sense that we can have while live. Living in worry of death is bad for one’s health and that is why should live with pleasure because it is good for one’s health. For example, Epicurus says, “Get used to believing that death is nothing to us. For all good and bad consists in sense-experience, and death is the privation of sense-experience” (124). What he is trying to say is why should we worry about the coming our death, when death is not coming any second right now. We should not be wasting our moment worrying about death but to get every second of pleasure before death comes. We should be living life to the fullest and not waste this chance of life. Finally, Epicureanism idea is that pleasure is to be the highest good in life and also was created. Epicurus says, “And this is why we say that pleasure is the starting-point and goal of living blessedly” (129) meaning that pleasure something that we will pursue and it is our goal in the end for us to live a blessedly life. Epicurus wants us to put pleasure as our main goal in life to achieve because living with happiness our whole life will give us a fully experience life to have when we die. Should every pleasure be desired and fulfilled? The answer to that question is no, not every pleasure should be fulfilled. According to Epicurus says, “So every pleasure is a good thing, since it has a nature congenial [to us], but not every one is to be chosen” (129). Epicurus believes that not every pleasure should be desired because every pleasure might have to endure pain trying to gain the pleasure. But not all pains should be avoided because enduring the pain could result in a larger and better pleasure in the end. Epicurus says, “we believe many pains to be better than pleasures when a greater pleasure follows for a long while if we endure the pains” (129). Because of this, that Epicurus wants us to, “comparative measurement and an examination of the advantages and disadvantages” (130), meaning we have to analyzes the advantages and disadvantages and to see if it is worth to desire and fulfill that pleasure. In the end it is our decision weather we endure the pain to achieve great pleasure or to avoid it because it has to many disadvantages and it is not worth the pain to pursuit. An example of decision making when it comes to advantages and disadvantages of pleasure.
One day, a male student decides to hang out with his friends and in the middle of the night they decided to snort some cocaine and ask if he wanted to do some lines with them. So he thought of a quote from one of his favorite philosopher Epicurus saying, “comparative measurement and an examination of the advantages and disadvantages” (130). Then he started to think out his advantages and disadvantages. If the student chooses to snort the cocaine he would receive great pleasure when the drugs start to affect him. But afterward the side effect of the drug will give him an addiction to it and if he does to much of it can possibly kill him. The addiction would probably make him waste money or beg people that he would do anything with his body for some of the drug. To him snorting the cocaine has more disadvantages than there are advantages. So in the end the male student decided not to snort the drugs with his friends and not associate with them anymore. This example is also a pleasure that should not be fulfilled because it has too many disadvantages and is not worth to pain to achieve
pleasure. A critic will say that a man cannot live all his life with pleasure because drugs is something that gives us pleasure. Well Epicurus would have to disagree with the critic because he did say that pleasure is the highest good, but not every pleasure should be desire or fulfilled. Epicurus says, “So every pleasure is a good thing, since it has a nature congenial [to us], but not every one is to be chosen” (129). He also says, “comparative measurement and an examination of the advantages and disadvantages” meaning that we have to examine and measure all the advantages and disadvantages before we can make our decisions. Drugs gives a person great pleasure, but it also comes with great pain like addiction. Pleasure of drugs will stay constant every time it is taken, but the pains of the addiction will only increase every single time. A critic will agree that there are too many disadvantages than advantages. Also drugs will lead our life into an unhappy one, which against Epicurus idea of a blessedly and happy life. So in Epicurus mind this would be pleasure that we should not fulfilled. Epicureanism is a great ideal that we should follow when living out our life. Living a life full of happiness and never having to live of our life full anxiety and worry sound pretty good. Not everything that feels good means it is good for us and not everything that is painfully is bad for us. Like Epicurus says, “we believe many pains to be better than pleasures when a greater pleasure follows for a long while if we endure the pains” (129). In the end it is based on our choices that we think will give us the most pleasure and happiness in life. It is also better for the body and mind to not worry about anything because it is bad for our health. Life should be live in happiness and not in fear. Remember think before choosing and always pursue the bigger and better pleasures in life.
This paper will offer a commentary on Herodotus’ Histories 2.129-135. Book Two of Histories concerns itself with Egypt; specifically chapters 99-182 detail rulers of Egypt both legendary and actual. Book Two is distinct from the other books in Histories as it is in this book that we predominantly experience Herodotus as an investigator. More precisely it is in Book Two that Herodotus treats first person experience not as direct evidence but as a method of assessing the accounts of others. Chapters 129-135 provide us with the tale of King Mycerinus as recounted by whom Herodotus refers to in 2.127 as simply ‘ÆGYPTIOI’. These Egyptians are referred to at various points in Book Two and at times appear to refer to what might be termed ‘Egyptians in general’ . However, we can make a reasonable assumption in this instance, given what has been stated before at 2.99 and what is stated later at 2.142, that the Egyptians that provide Herodotus with the tale of King Mycerinus are probably priests. It should not be assumed that priests are any more reliable than the lay Egyptian in Histories however; the Egyptian priesthood did not necessarily concern itself with historical accuracy. Indeed the inclusion of priests may simply be a Herodotean literary device designed to reinforce his reader’s credulity.
As a worldview, Stoicism is a philosophical approach to help people to cope with times of great stress and troubles. In order to give comfort to humanity, the Stoics agree with the Pantheistic view that God and nature are not separate. Instead, the two forces are one. By believing that God is nature, humans have a sense of security because nature, like God, is recognized as rational and perfect. The perfection of nature is explained through the Divine, or natural, Law. This law gives everything in nature a predetermined plan that defines the future based on past evens (cause and effect). Because the goal for everything in nature is to fulfill its plan, the reason for all that happens in nature is because it is a part of the plan. It is apparent that, because this law is of God, it must be good. The Divine Law is also universal. Everything on the planet has a plan that has already been determined. There are no exceptions or limitations to the natural law. The world in the Stoics’ eyes is flawless, equal, and rational.
Intellectuals are philosophers, are writers, are artists. They are all those people who work with their minds by questioning the events that touch them and that are touched by them. To recall a Plato's famous allegory, we can say that intellectuals are those who are able to look beyond the shadows and never take concepts for granted. However, some questions as what their role is and, more specifically, whether they should be engaged in politics are still unanswerable. Over the years answers and behaviors towards the engaged culture have been various and we can assume that the intellectuals who cannot separate the two live their lives actively for they want to be part of the events that surround them and let awareness win over apathy. On the contrary, we can assume that those who let apathy win are the intellectuals that look at politics and culture as two different and specific concepts and live a solitary life far from society. However, this is not an appropriate judgment because it would be difficult to consider to which extent solitude can be regarded as cowardliness and to which extent action can be regarded as consciousness.
From chasing joy to evading misery, it seems as if the ultimate purpose in life is to achieve happiness. However, the question regarding how to define and acquire happiness has continued to be a disputed topic. Beginning back in 350 BC, Aristotle developed and supported his view on human happiness as the fundamental end goal of human life in Nichomachean Ethics. However, others did not universally agree upon Aristotle’s accounts and ideas about happiness. In around 550 BC, Solon preached his own theory on happiness in The Histories, stating that a person’s happiness cannot be determined until death, testing Aristotle’s beliefs. Solon attempts, but fails, to refute Aristotle’s belief that happiness is an eternal, virtuous state, by arguing instead that happiness is subject to change.
“Why Herodotus believed Culture is King” Herodotus believed preservation of culture had to be the dominant policy in maintaining, and controlling an empire, thus believing that “culture is king”, Herodotus celebrated the cultures, and achievements of humanity. In Herodotus he writes, “The actions of people shall not fade with time, so the great and admirable monuments produced by both Greeks and Barbarians shall not go unrenowned, and among other things, set forth the reasons why they waged war against each other. ””(Herodotus)” this quote sums up Herodotus’s view, that culture is something that needed to be preserved, and documented. Through his many journeys and travels, Herodotus documented everything, and wrote about many cultures, and societies. He made it a point to not only gather information, and the specific culture, but the reasoning behind the rituals.
From pursuing pleasure to avoiding pain, life seems to ultimately be about achieving happiness. However, how to define and obtain happiness has and continues to be a widely debated issue. In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle gives his view on happiness. Aristotle focuses particularly on how reason, our rational capacity, should help us recognize and pursue what will lead to happiness and the good life.';(Cooley and Powell, 459) He refers to the soul as a part of the human body and what its role is in pursuing true happiness and reaching a desirable end. Aristotle defines good'; as that which everything aims.(Aristotle, 459) Humans have an insatiable need to achieve goodness and eventual happiness. Sometimes the end that people aim for is the activity they perform, and other times the end is something we attempt to achieve by means of that activity. Aristotle claims that there must be some end since everything cannot be means to something else.(Aristotle, 460) In this case, there would be nothing we would try to ultimately achieve and everything would be pointless. An ultimate end exists so that what we aim to achieve is attainable. Some people believe that the highest end is material and obvious (when a person is sick they seek health, and a poor person searches for wealth).
Epictetus, the Stoic philosopher, is one of the most influential ancient thinkers. Epictetus believed the purpose of moral philosophy was to help show people the way to lead better lives. He believed that some things in this world are un-controllable and some things are controllable; some things are up to us and some things are not up to us. Epictetus believed our opinions, impulses, desires, aversions, or whatever is our own doing is up to us; however, our bodies, our possessions, our reputations, or whatever is not our own doing, is not up to us. He also believed that we should not try and control the world, but accept it and make the best out of every situation. Epictetus’ aim was to live well, to secure happiness and to offer different solutions as to how life was to be lived. I will attempt to summarize some of Epictetus’ disciplines in a way that will give a simple view on how one should live their life; and also try to interpret his views into modern day living so that through their application ones life will become simplified and therefore enhanced.
Drug users rationalize that they would be unhappier if they were kept from addictive substance, therefore they increase drug use. Increased drug consumption displays what is labeled as addiction in this theory. A situation is created where high drug use becomes a daily problem. Harmful addictions have two properties: reduced welfare and increased need for the good (Henden, Melberg, & Rogeberg,
Aristotle feels we have a rational capacity and the exercising of this capacity is the perfecting of our natures as human beings. For this reason, pleasure alone cannot establish human happiness, for pleasure is what animals seek and human beings have higher capacities than animals. The goal is to express our desires in ways that are appropriate to our natures as rational animals. Aristotle states that the most important factor in the effort to achieve happiness is to have a good moral character, what he calls complete virtue. In order to achieve the life of complete virtue, we need to make the right choices, and this involves keeping our eye on the future, on the ultimate result we want for our lives as a whole. We will not achieve happiness simply by enjoying the pleasures of the moment. We must live righteous and include behaviors in our life that help us do what is right and avoid what is wrong. It is not enough to think about doing the right thing, or even intend to do the right thing, we have to actually do it. Happiness can occupy the place of the chief good for which humanity should aim. To be an ultimate end, an act must be independent of any outside help in satisfying one’s needs and final, that which is always desirable in itself and never for the sake of something else and it must be
Happiness is the ultimate goal for everyone in life. Aristotle's definition of " happiness is happiness is the activity of the soul in accord with perfect virtue. To become a better person, we must practice virtuous acts regularly. After a while, these acts will become a habit and so the virtuous acts. part of our every day life and the person will be leading a virtuous life.
However, we can wonder if the pleasures that derive from necessary natural desires are what actually brings us happiness, since having a family, friends, a good job and doing fun things seem to bring the most joy in life. Plato’s ideas on life are even more radical, since he claims that we should completely take difference from our bodily needs. Therefore it seems that we should only do what is necessary for us to stay a life and solely focus on the mind. Although both ways of dealing with (bodily)pleasure are quite radical and almost impossible to achieve, it does questions if current perceptions of ‘living the good life’ actually leads to what we are trying to achieve, which is commonly described as
The pursuit for happiness has been a quest for man throughout the ages. In his ethics, Aristotle argues that happiness is the only thing that the rational man desires for its own sake, thus, making it good and natural. Although he lists three types of life for man, enjoyment, statesman, and contemplative, it is the philosopher whom is happiest of all due to his understanding and appreciation of reason. Aristotle’s version of happiness is not perceived to include wealth, honor, or trivial
In life, it certainly seems that for most people, happiness is the end goal. People do what they do for many reasons, but quite often their motives are simply fueled by their desire to be happy. However, happiness is attained in many different ways. As Aristotle points out, happiness is achieved through goodness, which is also very complicated. After all, life is not black and white, and our actions are not just good or bad. Rather, our actions can have ends that are intrinsically good or instrumentally good. If they are instrumentally good, then they will allow us to attain something that we can "trade" for something else that will bring us happiness. For example, if we win tickets at an arcade, they would be considered instrumentally good because although they don't bring us happiness, we can trade them in for a prize that does. On the other hand, some things are intrinsically good. We want these things simply because we want them; they bring us pleasure or security. When we obtain these things, we are satisfied with them and we experience happiness.
The use of drugs is a controversial topic in society today. In general, addicts show a direct link between taking drugs and suffering from their effects. People abuse drugs for a wide variety of reasons. In most cases, the use of drugs will serve a type of purpose or will give some kind of reward. These reasons for use will differ with different kinds of drugs. Various reasons for using the substance can be pain relief, depression, anxiety and weariness, acceptance into a peer group, religion, and much more. Although reasons for using may vary for each individual, it is known by all that consequences of the abuse do exist. It is only further down the line when the effects of using can be seen.
Happiness can be viewed as wealth, honour, pleasure, or virtue. Aristotle believes that wealth is not happiness, because wealth is just an economic value, but can be used to gain some happiness; wealth is a means to further ends. The good life, according to Aristotle, is an end in itself. Similar to wealth, honour is not happiness because honour emphases on the individuals who honour in comparison to the honouree. Honour is external, but happiness is not. It has to do with how people perceive one another; the good life is intrinsic to the...