Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Concept of employee engagement
Concept of employee engagement
Literature review employee engagement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Concept of employee engagement
Employee engagement is a property of the relationship between an organization and its employees. An engaged employee refer to one who is fully absorbed by and enthusiastic about their work and so takes positive action to further the organization's images. According to Kahn’s view (1990), employee engagement is defined as harnessing of organization members’ selves to their own work roles, people employ and express themselves in three different aspects which are physical, cognitive, and emotional during role performances. The cognitive aspect concerns about the employees beliefs’ about its leaders and the working conditions in the organization. The emotional aspect is concerns about how employees feel and whether they have positive or negative …show more content…
2001). The engagement is characterized by three dimensions which are energy, involvement, and efficacy was the opposite of the three burnout dimensions of exhaustion, cynicism, and lacking of professional efficacy. Exhaustion measures the weary without referring to other people as the source of one’s tiredness. Cynicism refers to indifference or a distant attitude towards work, not necessarily with other people. Lastly, professional efficacy includes both social and non-social aspects of occupational accomplishments. Low scores on exhaustion and cynicism, and high scores on efficacy are foretelling for engagement. It becomes clear that the burnout can occur to individuals who do not work with other people. They also state that engagement is not a momentary and specific state, but it is a more sustainable and pervasive affective-cognitive state that is not focused on any particular object, event or individual. Burnout and engagement, both are opposite concepts, but should be measured independently with different instruments. Engagement is characterized by three dimensions which are vigour, dedication, and absorption (Schaufeli and Bakker, 2004). Vigour reflects employees’ willingness to put their efforts into their job, the high levels of energy and their patience and persistence in facing the difficulties. Dedication refers to the employees’ high involvement in their job, and by a sense of enthusiasm and significance. Absorption means ones being fully concentrated and pleasantly occupied with work, this can be easily seen from the employee who does not keeping the track of time and their inability to separate themselves from the job at
Workers feeling, which includes competitive compensation and reward strategies, professional growth and development, career paths and succession plans and the organizations leadership and culture are contributing factors of employee engagement
Boston, MA: Pearson Sivarethinamohan, R. R., & Aranganathan, P. P. (2011). Determinants of employee engagement
AB appears to struggle with trust. During initial engagement he is described as guarded. He appears not to be forthcoming about some things. AB stated things he has said has been misconstrued or misinterpreted. So he has become selective in the information he shares. He has had encounters with various service providers throughout his 15 years in care. When he appears uncomfortable he shuts down. When he believes he is being judge or degraded he becomes offensive and verbally aggressive. AB needs additional time, additional time and positive reinforcement. He needs to feel as if he has control of areas of his life. During the engagement process, one should focus on him as a person and she him as a victim of the trauma he has experience.
Motivation is not something that comes easily. More times than not motivation comes in spurts. When those times happen, it is imperative to make sure that one takes full advantage of the rare time. According to the online site, Business Dictionary, motivation is defined as both internal and external factors that stimulate desire and energy in people to be continually interested and committed to a job, role or subject or to make an effort to attain a goal.
Certainly those organisations which have successfully created a culture of employee engagement have reaped the benefits (Downey et al., 2015:39). However, an engaged employee culture requires stability of employment, something that is becoming increasingly rare in a working environment where a job for life is an oddity rather than the norm (Bal and De Lang, 2015:129). Employees must feel safe and secure before they can become engaged, and in a culture where high turnover of jobs is standard, then engagement is likely to be elusive. In order for the theory of employee engagement to be successful, organisations must create the right conditions for engagement and commit to the process. Similarly, in order for employee engagement in the working environment to be effective in practice, there is a need for a collegial approach. Due to many stakeholders taking on engagement roles, it doesn’t leave enough space for employees to engage in their work without having superiors constantly watching over them. The collegial approach allows the theory of employee engagement to be implemented, allowing for collective, shared responsibility by each member of the company, with minimal supervision from
Definition. Schaufeli’s (as cited in Truss, Delbridge, Alfes, Shantz, & Soane, 2014, p. 26) ideas on employee engagement can be explained by using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model. Job demands and availability or lack of resources, both job and personal, either contribute to or deter employee engagement, this is illustrated by the JD-R (Truss et al., 2014). On the positive side, according to Truss et al. (2014) job and personal resources “foster engagement in terms of vigor (energy), dedication (persistence) and absorption (focus)” (p. 26). An employee who has the resources needed to do their job is better equipped to do the job and thereby better able to perform their job (Truss et al., 2014). Employees who are better able to meet job
The well renowned founder of positive psychology, Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, devised a new theory on a state of being in which he named “flow” after questioning why certain people “live” life and others do not. Mihaly first set off on this intellectual quest after his experiences in a prison camp during WWII. In his book, Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life (1997), Mihaly described this new idea of flow and how it could be reached.
In his study about psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work, Kahn have shown that there are three psychological engagement elements that can influence an individual’s behaviour in relation to their job function. The elements are 1) meaningfulness - rewards from engagement, 2) safety - higher willingness to engage, and 3) availability - readiness to engage (Kahn, 1990). Because of his work, Kahn is widely regarded as the pioneer of employee engagement and his findings are still engaged and found in many references about employee
Burnout is a response to chronic emotional stress due to those factors, resulting in reduced job productivity, and emotional and/or physical exhaustion. (Perlman & Hartman, 1982). Many studies consider burnout to be a job-related stress condition or even work-related mental health impairment, with the ICD-10 closely tying burnout with the diagnosis of work-related neurasthenia (Awa et al., 2010; Maslach, Schaufeli, & Leiter, 2001; World Health Organization, 1992). Numerous conceptualisation of the burnout phenomenon has been posited but most researchers favour a multidimensional definition developed by Maslach and colleagues (1993; 1996) that encompasses three aspects: emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation, and reduced personal accomplishment at work.
Based off of the gratification an individual contains towards their work is job satisfaction. The productivity could either be positive or negative while the relationship between the productivity and satisfaction may not be consistent. There are multiple internal and external factors of job satisfaction that can impact the behavior of an employee and engagement over time. The way the worker’s attitude concerning their field effects the performance they perform on a daily basis. One who is satisfied with the job they maintain, succeed at what they do. “It is therefore imperative for a company to understand the attitude of its workers and measure the job satisfaction of its employees, as job satisfaction is essential for productivity” (L. Bradshaw
In many organisations, managers and bosses have found it a struggle implementing successful strategies to improve job satisfaction and productivity among its employees. While dealing with unproductive, unmotivated and unsatisfied employees, there is an increased risk for turnover, which can be prevented. The risk of high turnover is a problem to workplaces as turnover has been proven to ‘take its toll’ on productivity as it disrupts current projects and increases workloads for other employees. It also has a negative impact on team cohesion (Patrick and Sonia, 2012). Job satisfaction is one’s general attitude to the job, and higher the job satisfaction, the more likely he/she will hold a positive attitude towards their job (De Menzes, 2011). De Menzes (2011) believes that employees who are satisfied with their jobs are likely to be more committed to their organisation and be more productive. People are significantly more productive when they are content and achieving individual and organisational goals are able to be fulfilled in a work environment where employees feel happy and motivated. Interventions which can be used to improve job satisfaction and productivity to decrease rates of turnover and unmotivated employees include an increase in workplace training, as well as performance pay.
Today businesses believe that the sustaining of performance and competitive advantage to becoming a great organization. As an organization’s success depends on their employees’ performance, the value of specific individual employee has played an important role within an organization to be competitive. At that time, the value of each and individual employee and their satisfaction with their jobs are one of the key factors for an organization and organizations need to find ways to improve employee job satisfaction to achieve organizational goals.
Engagement in positive psychology supports mindfulness of thoughts and emotions. Positive psychology is different in that it focuses on positive mental health instead of mental illness. Focusing on positive traits leads to happiness. In turn, happiness leads to productivity, success, and fulfillment. Genetics may play a large part in happiness, but there are many skills and strategies, which can reverse brain messages, bad habits, and unhealthy thinking.
Here are some figures that display how Employee engagement practices have bolstered up the efficiency and productivity of the employees and in return have augmented the profits of the companies. According to a new meta-analysis that was conducted by the Gallup organisation amongst 1.4 million employees, the organisations that focus on employee engagement practices to a large extent have reported 22% increase in productivity. These practices even impr...
Employee engagement is the level of commitment and involvement an employee has towards his organization and its values. It is a measureable degree of an employee's positive or negative emotional attachment to their job, colleagues and organization which profoundly influences their willingness to learn & perform at work. Employee engagement has a direct impact on the employee’s productivity. Understandably, the most productive employees