Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection on Philosophies of Education
My educational philosophy
Philosophy of education123
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection on Philosophies of Education
Educational Theory is, according to Editor Chris Higgins, "an important forum for scholarship and debate in the foundations of education." First published in May of 1951, the journal is a bimonthly publication that seeks to promote and encourage the continuing development of educational theory, as well as a broad and effective discussion of theoretical problems within the educational profession. It also seeks to advance the development of educational theory within itself, and to address the wider issues of schools, politics, and society. As a future educator, the theories associated with my discipline, and the issues inherent in them, as they have changed over time and as they stand now, are of great interest and importance to me.
The journal was first published with the help of two sponsoring organizations: the John Dewey Society and The College of Education at the University of Illinois. Today, the Philosophy of Education Society and Wiley-Blackwell, a global partner of over 800 prestigious societies, have joined the university and the John Dewey Society to help produce one of the leading journals of theory in education, both in the country and worldwide. In every publication, the journal addresses issues both within the discipline of educational theory, as well other educational disciplines, and has always been a place where "philosophers and theoretically inclined scholars... engage in a shared conversation about educational ideas, values, and policy issues." Throughout the decades, the journal discusses the current educational theories at different moments and the challenges associated with them. These issues are often similar, though still different depending on the popular theories and social and political issues of the t...
... middle of paper ...
...xist, they are being transformed to apply to the current, postmodern world and are opening up to cross-cultural and international examination. In addition, as education in the United States is sub-par compared to other countries, the government is attempting to direct the field in a competitive direction. Unfortunately, the United States, in an attempt to align the education system in this country with systems in other, higher performing countries, created the Common Core State Standards. This development, while sound in theory, is failing in practice and education is heading towards being based in competition, rather than being based in what it ought to be, that is knowledge. Instead of attempting to compete with other nations, the United States needs to focus on the problems inherent in its systems and the affects of those problems on the students of this country.
There are numerous management theories that educators can align themselves with in order to form their professional philosophy. This essays purpose is to analyse three popular Classroom management theories and models used in Australian schools today. The Theories are Goal Centred Theory, Choice Theory and Assertive Discipline. A teacher relies heavily on their sound knowledge of pertinent theory to justify their teaching decisions; this knowledge is applied when forming classroom management plans. (Lyons, Ford and Slee, 2014)
White, J. (1982). The aims of education restated (pp. 121-2). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
The Common Core State Standards has been adopted by many states in the United States already. This issue is gaining both positive and negative opinions within the education world and society. Some want to know why the standards were created and what the meaning behind these standards is. What is the reasoning for implementing these standards, and why is there so much controversy that follows. Why do these four words cause such controversy? The following will analyze and evaluate The Common Core State Standards in hopes to understand why education is being overtaken by them.
Matheson, D. and Grosvenor, I. (1999) An Introduction to the study of Education. London: David Fulton Publishers.
(2014) exclaimed that why do 62 percent of parents think the Common Core is not perfect for their kids, despite it has fascinated some entrepreneurs such as Bill Gates and the secretary of education. In a case in point, parents should get more involved in the education of their children if they do not approve of measures being used. She agrees to the idea of a federal government using incentives to adopt their specific education program, but then again she only sees that parents complaining and not taking action. In another context, “parents have no choice about whether their kids will learn Common Core, no matter what school they put them in, if they want them to go to college, because the SAT and ACT are being redesigned to fit the new national program for education”. (Pullmann, J. 2014, September 24, p. 1). In fact, Porter (1989) states that the Common Core standards became as opposing to teachers and teaching occupation, and the tactics are not good strong enough for enabling teachers to be dependent. The teacher is often understood to be the planned without rules. Moreover, some voices against the criticism of the common core, they believe that it is meaningless because districts are still permitted to select which material goes out with stem the basis stated by the Common Core
In the United Sates, the education systems priority level is continuously decreasing. As this major issue goes on to decreases in value, the economy is directly effected as well; the economy will go downhill and will linger backwards in development (Campante). Education is one of the most significant factors in developing a country yet it keeps getting over looked in the United States. This topic is important to me because I am going to school to be a teacher, and the education system keeps losing importance. The future of America will be directly affected by how we educate America’s children today.
Many different ideas of the correct educational philosophy exist. Highly acclaimed psychologists and educators developed these varying philosophies. Each of these philosophies have their strengths and weaknesses and have their positives and negatives in different situations. It is our job as educators to sift through this list of philosophies to find our own style and philosophy. We must research the pros and cons of each philosophy and pick and choose which sections of each idea to take out and make our own. Our job is also to familiarize ourselves with the philosophies that we do not agree with. So that we have a clear picture in our minds of what we want and do not want as part of our educational thinking and to have the knowledge to back up these opinions.
When did education start? Do we still need education to function as a society? How long will public education remain a kindergarten through twelfth grade curriculum? The answers to these questions will vary from person to person, but they will all have one common theme: education will and must go on! Education is the key to a progressing society. Education is the only way that knowledge is passed from generation to generation. In this paper I will explain why I wish to teach, my educational goals, and the philosophy that I will use during my teaching career.
Kneller, George. (1971). Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
The functionalist perspective argues for education as a means of development from simple, traditional social structures to more complex, modern ones. Drawing heavily from biological theories, functionalism equates society with a living organism composed of various internal systems, asserting that an understanding of these systems, in our case social practices and institutions, requires an examination of the means by which they serve the ‘body’, society (Feinberg and Solitis, ). In assessing the relationship between education and development, it is imperative to note that functionalists associate the advent of formal, compulsory education with the requirements of modern society, with modernity seen as synonymous with industrialization. That
Webb, L. D., Metha, A., & Forbis, J. K. (2010). Foundations of American Education. Colombus: Merrill.
Throughout the studies of some typical issues in education that the authors cited in the three texts, this essay will explore the perspectives on education and key aspects in each article. Meanwhile, the implications for contemporary education and their significances will also be examined in this essay.
Fischman, Wendy, Jennifer A Dibara and Howard Gardner. "Creating good education against the odds."Cambridge Journal of Education, 36. 3 (2006): 383--398. Print.
What does the ideal education system look like? It is an interesting question. By looking at what the current model of the educational system is lacking can help to produce a clear picture of what the ideal educational system would be. Many people would agree that current the education system has failed in to produce positive results. In many ways the current education system does not meet the needs of students.
Pedagogy is a difficult concept to understand or master, and as shown by the three educational theorists explored in this report no two ideals are the same and not every pedagogue will be able to agree with all educational documents. Although numerous problems were found in both frameworks there were still numerous positive attributes which highlighted the importance of furthering education in our schools, and that is a point that all three theorists cannot deny.