Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History Is The Study Of Past Events
Study of history is important
Study of history is important
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History Is The Study Of Past Events
During my time working on this project, I decided to investigate four early Church leaders that I had only a baseline understanding about. All of these leaders fit the definition of apostle well, even though only one of them was an actual apostle. Namely, I studied Veronica, Luke, Andrew, and Stephen. Through this project, I discovered similarities between these figures and myself; each of the four all attained values that I strive for. While Veronica was never mentioned in the Scriptures, her legacy thrives today as a symbol of helping those who need it most. Surely, one would need to be brave in order to walk through a murderous crowd to temporarily relieve a criminal about to be executed. She is an inspiration to me in the way that her story teaches that through even the littlest of things, one can cause change. Clearly, this is signified by Jesus’ facial imprint on her cloth. Veronica’s story will be remembered as a …show more content…
Luke traveled extensively with Paul’s group. He could have stayed in one place and taught Jesus’ mission there, but instead he helped spread Christianity to other places. He helped Catholicism be catholic, or universal. Additionally, Luke strived for historical accuracy. His written works have been archeologically verified. These reasons help establish Luke as a person that I want to become. I knew the least about Andrew, the third disciple I studied. I knew that he was a fisherman and a brother of Peter. Yet, what I took away most from him came from what I had already known about Andrew—he left everything behind to follow Jesus. He left everything that was familiar to him in order to join Jesus’ company. This signifies that God should be the most important thing in our lives. Andrew’s devotion show particularly well during his crucifixion, where he preached the entire time that he was dying. This ties in with my final disciple I
“The author Victor Rhee of “Hebrews as a Leader of the Faith Community” enlightens the path way on the subject of leaders in the body of Christ. The title alone brings a certain kind of curiosity to what makes a leader according to the book of Hebrews. If leadership training could have a manual it should be parallel to Hebrews. Leadership today is missing the courage to stand for something that is right according to the word of God. No matter what is taking place in our society beliefs and value system. Leadership has suffered greatly both inside and outside the church, especially in Christian leadership. One of the main points that the author of this article points out is the society woes are the same as ours today. How fitting is this when we need direction for Christian ministry. There is a soul searching event that is taking place for leaders to rise up and be all of what God intended for them in caring the gospel of Christ to the world. Rhee, who wrote the journal points to the characteristics of the author of Hebrews as a leader who will arise for the cause of Christ by illuminating the importance of courage, faith, love, hope , to fight against apostates, and believe in leadership unity when leading as a leader of the Christian faith.
Luke was a Roman catholic before he converted over to Christianity. Luke was an eyewitness of the ministry, teaching, and life of Jesus. He made it his mission to teach the knowledge of Jesus and spread the religion Christianity. He wanted to reach the people in his communities and beyond. The Evangelist Luke wanted to tell the goods news that Jesus would return for his people. Luke’s concern was whether or not Christians could be good citizens of the Roman Empire, seeing that Jesus their founder had been killed for being a “political criminal”. Many people would have preceded them as revolutionaries (“From Jesus to Christ”). Christianity became a dominant way of life and worship in Europe many years after Luke wrote his gospel. In Medieval Europe, Luke’s gospel had greatly influenced the creators of many arts and dramas such as the Everyman play. Luke’s gospel opened many doors to help spread Christianity in Medieval Europe.
There are four Gospels in the new testament; Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Each one writing his perspective story about Jesus, his teachings, his works, his sacrifice, and his resurrection. At the same time, they each seem to elaborate on specific elements of Jesus. The gospel of Matthew writes about the bloodline, the ancestors of Jesus. The gospel of Mark, writes about Jesus as a servant to God. The gospel of Luke, writes about Jesus being the son of a human. The gospel of John, writes about Jesus being the son of God. Having an understanding on the focus of each gospel will help the reader know Jesus and his works better. However, this essay will concentrate on “The Gospel According to Mark,” written in Bruce Manning Metzger, translator of, The New Oxford Annotated Bible, Revised Standard Version with The Apocrypha (p. 1791). The gospel of Mark is documentation of
I would like to write about St. Mark’s Lutheran church, Atchison, Kansas. The history of the church is very unique. My first call was at this church and I also made new history by being the first woman pastor also a person of color.
15 But God in his grace chose me even before I was born, and called me to serve him. And when he decided 16 to reveal his Son to me, so that I might preach the Good News about him to the Gentiles, I did not go to anyone for advice, 17 nor did I go to Jerusalem to see those who were apostles before me. Instead, I went at once to Arabia, and then I returned to Damascus. 18 It was three years later that I went to Jerusalem to obtain information from Peter, and I stayed with him for two weeks. 19 I did not see any other apostle except James,[a] the Lord’s
When Jesus called His disciples, His invitation was simple. He invited them to follow Him. The same is true today. In Matthew 28, Jesus gave His last charge to His disciples, and the charge was simple. He called his followers to go and make disciples. Much effort has been placed by Christians to fulfill this charge, commonly referred to as the Great Commission. Jesus chose to fulfill the implementation of the New Covenant through 12 men who He called, appointed, and commissioned, and he only had a few short years to prepare them for the task (Willson, 1990). His methods were unconventional and were revolutionary for that time. His disciples were to be trained extensively by Jesus, living with Him for three years prior to His ascension. He taught about servant leadership and its meaning for both the leader and follower Matt. 20:25-28). From the beginning, Jesus put in place a careful plan, and an examination of His actions in the Gospels showed that Jesus left behind the pattern to be replicated. His methods, which included the incorporation of three different levels of discipleship, included His interaction with Peter, His closest three (Peter, James, and John), and finally the group of 12. This paper identified and analyzed the three levels of discipleship Jesus modeled, these discipleship methods were then measured against modern leadership theories, and Jesus’s level of involvement and interaction with his disciples were critiqued in light of these modern theories in an effort to determine the effectiveness of this approach.
Over the past years of my life I have seen many changes, some for the good and others not as good. Change can be demanding and also crucial. The early believers would encounter this. One can see that significant change happened, when reading through the gospels and the book of acts it is obvious to the reader that the believers who followed Jesus would never be the same again.
Luke was a doctor and a co-worker with Paul (Colossians 4:14; Philemon v24). Because some spurious stories about Jesus were circulating, Luke decided to interview local eye-witnesses and people who had followed Jesus closely. Luke collated all the interviews into a single account, recording details not mentioned elsewhere, for example regarding the conception and birth of Jesus and Mary's extended family, as you might expect of a doctor.
...Peter with the rest of the disciples, and not that of the “over exalted” view some people of the time had created.
Servant leadership has gained attention among leadership authors over the last twenty years. Even Collins and his team had to address the impact of servant leadership qualities in the actions of their Level 5 Leaders (Collins, 2001, Kindle loc. 531). While servant leadership has enjoyed increasing popularity among secular writers, Blackaby and Blackaby suggest a growing trend among Christian leaders to give greater emphasis to secular leadership theories at the expense of principles such as servant leadership (2011, p. 19). To better assess the significance of servant leadership to the biblical narrative, the author will evaluate the history of five prominent biblical leaders for evidence of qualities or leadership principles typical of servant leadership.
The Catholic Church’s corruption during the late Middle Ages further enabled church reforms due to the ever-increasing view of the loss of credibility within the church by both the laity and clergy. Thus implementing the ideas of reform. Martin Luther is considered the father of the reformation where he instigated the challenging for the church, papal authority, and changed how the people were allowed to worship. Carlstadt and Zwingli, much like Luther, practiced Evangelical traditions, however, they expanded further than Luther in regards to doctrine and practice. John Calvin on the other hand challenged some of the Evangelical and Reformed Traditions by various religious changes politically and socially. Lindberg examines the Evangelical
It may seem a little bit strange, but my favorite place in town in none other than this beautiful Evangelic Church. However, it wasn’t always so.
Dogget, Dr. Gerald. “The Minds of Ministry Leadership: Jesus’ Leadership of These Ordinary People.” Lecture, Faith Christian University, Orlando, FL, November, 2013.
Peter was not lazy to fill out the great instructions given to him. His growth is shown in acts, where Peter was a leader and spokesman among 120 believers on Pentecost, went on several missions alongside Paul where he performed miracles and converted thousands of souls. Although he had the Holy spirit, peter's job was not an easy one, but for his preaching of the word, he was put on trial, arrested and beaten for his works, but despite the suffering he went through, god put to use his perseverance from being a fisherman. Peter not only preached alongside his fellow apostles, but became a predominant leader, they often looked to Peter when it came to decision making. He was not just a leader of the apostles, but is also considered a pillar of the early church, and wrote two epistles by his own name in the New Testament.
In the Acts 2 New Testament Church, leadership was defined in terms community without hierarchy and authority, in fact, leadership rested solely with the saints instead of a singular man (Bilezikian, 2007). Leadership was hesed to the New Testament saints and apostles by Christ who fulfilled the New Covenant on the cross, and shared in community through mutual accountability (CCBS, n.d.); hence, the function of leadership was to release the potential of the community in sharing the good news of the gospel with a broken world (Bilezikian, 2007). Following the advent of congregational churches, came authoritarian leaders who often disguised servant leadership with a lust for power and control over a community in stringent rules and dogma (Bilezikian, 2007). Thus, the end results of authoritarian leadership were the destruction of community leadership potential, and violation of the New Testament Church structure with hierarchy (Bilezikian,