Doubts About Doublespeak By William Lutz

150 Words1 Page

In the essay “Doubts About Doublespeak”(1993), William Lutz, depicts how utilizing doublespeak can damage a society. Lutz begins with providing examples of doublespeak that range from silly to serious, showing how doublespeak can be harmless but can also be used to disguise a truth with a manipulation of words. While there is different types of doublespeak, Lutz breaks it down into four different categories euphemism, jargon, gobbledygook and inflated language, all four of these types of doublespeak share the similarity that they are phrases or words that make something negative sound good. There is more types of doublespeak that can be seen all around us as doublespeak is being created everyday and everywhere so much that it can not be escaped.

Open Document