Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of hookup culture
Consequences of hookup culture
Consequences of hookup culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of hookup culture
Has the hookup culture ruined the traditional “asking out someone” or the passing of the notes in class saying “will you date me? Check yes or no”? When discussing the topic of hooking up, it has become such a casual conversation that it doesn't even phase anyone anymore. Ninety-one percent of college women say a "hook-up culture" defines their campus, and a new study reveals they are right (ABC News). Donna Freitas is the author of the essay, “Time to Stop Hooking Up (You Know You Want to),” she analyzed the pros and the cons of hooking up in college. Most parents preach that you should wait until marriage to lose your virginity because that is what's “right,” - at least my parents did. Times have changed so much since they have been in college …show more content…
She ran a study where she surveyed a handful of students and “36 percent at non-religious private and public schools said their peers were too casual about sex” (Freitas 1). Another study she ran showed the impact of the hookup culture in today's colleges. The study proved that “41 percent used words such as “regretful,” “empty,” “miserable,” “disgusted,” “ashamed,” “dumped,” and even “abused” to describe the actions that happened in previous hookups” (Freitas 2). The other 59 percent of the survey said they had mixed signals or were “fine” with the hookup. Many people refuse to openly admit how they feel about sex and casual hookups. Words used to describe hookups were adjectives such as “whatever,” and “mostly okay,” (Freitas 2). In today's society, hooking up is a casual topic and not something secret or special. It has become the ‘norm’ to have physical intimacy before going on the first date because first dates are “are deemed unnecessary or even forbidden” (Freitas 2). In college, everyone wants to know whos hooking up with who, which means nothing is a secret …show more content…
When you run a google search asking “what is the hookup culture” the accurate definition pops up. It states that it is “a person that accepts and encourages casual sexual encounters, including one-night stands and other related activity, without necessarily including emotional bonding or long-term commitment. It is generally associated with late adolescent behavior and, in particular, American college culture” (hidden brain). In Freitas research, she states how the tone of ethics has changed and evolved over the past 60 years. The social and cultural norm- and society's expectations were the complete opposite of what they are now and are clearly shown through her research. Not only does Donna Freitas tell us that she has been studying this for 8 years it also reassures us that we are caught in the thick of this cultural change. Students now are leaning more towards the so-called “friends with benefits” rather than having a steady committed relationship. While doing her research, she said that a large portion of “them that were in long term relationships started out as hooking up before getting to know who their partner first” (Freitas 2). If a boy were to ask you on a date first, before sleeping with him, is a true gentleman and is incredibly hard to find so hold on to that boy for
Donna Freitas “Time to Stop Hooking Up. (You Know You Want to.)” First appeared as an editorial in the Washington Post in 2013. In this essay Freitas aims to convince her readers that hooking up may seem easy and less stress than a real relationship, but in reality they become unhappy, confused, and unfulfilled in their sex life. “Hookups are all about throwing off the bonds of relationships and dating for carefree sex” personal experience, compare and contrast are a few techniques Freitas skillfully uses to strong convincing essay.
Conor Kelly argues in her article, “Sexism in Practice: Feminist Ethics Evaluating the Hookup Culture” that the hookup culture is sexist and disempowers women. Although, he mentions it is difficult to define “hooking up” but majority of the students will agree that it involves “some level of sexual activity without the constraints and expectations of a relationship” (Kelly 65). In other words, when two people have casual sex with no strings attached, when they both finish they both can go on with their lives without
In reaction to the media’s numerous stigmas around college hookup culture in recent years, sociologists and psychologists have begun to investigate adolescent and young adult hookups more systematically. In “Is Hooking Up Bad for Young Women?” by Elizabeth A. Armstrong, Laura Hamilton and Paula England, this issue is addressed through a reaction to previous articles from sources on opposite sides. One side of the argument over sexual activity for young women places them at risk of “low self esteem, depression, alcoholism, and eating disorders,” while the other side argues that the underlying issue is the “moral panic over casual sex.” This issue has been seen by many as a “sudden and alarming change in youth sexual culture,” but systematic research has shown that experiences of young women in college
Farley in the “Norms for Just Sex” argues that social justice has accepted the norms on hooking up. “The norm derives from our obligation to respect relationally, but not only from this. It derives more generally from the obligation to respect all persons as ends in themselves, to respect their autonomy and relationally, and thus not to harm them but to support them (Farley, 228)”. This correlates with my argument that hooking up is moral based on the acceptance of society. In addition “whether persons are single or married, gay or straight, bisexual or ambiguously gendered, old or young, abled or challenge in the ordinary forms of sexual expression, they have claims to respect from the Christian community as well as the wider society (Farley, 228).” Again, this proves my argument to be right when I said that acceptance is the key to hooking up, no one really cares anymore of who you are, what you do, and how you do it, as long as you can accept one another hooking up is the norm of
As stated in the book, “college students have much to teach about sex” (8). That is because the values, ideologies, and worldviews of the students are representative of greater American culture. Although flawed, hookup culture on American campuses hold the possibility of accepting a culture of inclusivity, care, pleasure, and freedom while also rejecting predatory behavior, racism, classism, and abuse. Dismissing hookup culture all together is blind to the reality that young adults are going to have sex, and since sex is non-negotiable, one’s aim should be to foster open dialogue and critical thought onto a future where everyone enjoys the ability to freely explore sexuality, sex, and gender on their own
Dating back to the early 1900’s and all the way through to the present, romantic relationships have been viewed differently. From strict unwritten dating regulations to not having regulations at all, recent generations have become more liberated in making their own decisions. The progressing times have made us become a more accepting society and have caused a decrease in the strong practice of religion and class. Even though differences such as religion and class in relationships were more than an issue they were not always a complete deterrence.
One of the points Freitas makes in the beginning of the book is, “The rise and “progress” of hookup culture rests in the fact that young adults are simply getting better at being uncaring.” (13). Is it “uncaring” of the active independence of choice to engage in hookups without the shame? Women for centuries have been sexually repressed by societal pressures, so when they choose to become liberated from the shame, they are met with the idea that they are ambivalent to sex. She says that hookup culture hinders people from becoming successful in her terms, “ We cannot encourage our students and children to become whole, integrated, empowered, and virtuous people if we fail to adequately address hookup culture and to articulate how it works against these goals.” (15). So, not only does it make people “uncaring” to Freitas, it also somehow discredits your capability to be successful. Those ideas sound very much like the rhetoric used on women for centuries to defuse their empowerment. She also includes, “Ultimately, we need to empower them to seek the kinds of relationships they want…”(16). Freitas neglects to acknowledge that some women might want to engage in hookups and not desire a relationship in the traditional sense. There is constant ignorance of choice behind sexuality and expression, confused with a lack of
Arnett (2000) explains the nature of romantic relationships in adolescence as tentative and transient where dating has more of a social component rather than romantic. He also describes dating in adolescence as often taking place in groups, where “adolescents share recreation such as parties, dances, and hanging out” (p. 473). It is evident that romantic relationships in adolescence are unstable, short-lived, and lack the mature component seen across adult romantic relationships. Arnett conveys that exploration in love becomes more serious and intimate during emerging adulthood. As opposed to adolescent romantic relationships, dating in emerging adulthood “is more likely to take place in couples, and the focus is less on recreation and more on exploring the potential for emotional and physical intimacy” (473). For instance, an adolescent in high school may seek a romantic partner to gain some sort of social status or experience in the process of romantic exploration whereas a senior in college may seek a long-term and mature partner to build a life with in adulthood. Exploration in the area of love during emerging adulthood “tends to involve a deeper level of intimacy, and the implicit question
Now while casual sex is not innately a bad thing, a culture that prioritizes sex over love is. As the line between sex and love gets more ambiguous so too does the line between a healthy and unhealthy relationship. Adolescents who constantly absorb sexual media at a young age are more likely to accept a hook up culture as their own. This can lead to young adults with limited romantic relationship experiences to accept hookup culture as the normal. The worst part is that these people are often self fulfilling prophecies.
England’s Online College Social Life Survey found that in the US, by senior year, 40 percent students were still virgins or had sexual intercourse with only one person. Thirty percent students had no experience of hook-ups. However, 20 percent of women and 25 percent of women reported having ten or more hook-up partners. Low achievers and hook-ups The NYT article, like the article in The Guardian, says that unmotivated and troubled students were more likely to hook up than students with academic targets and career ambition.
In doing so, Freitas distinguish between the spiritual colleges and the Evangelical colleges in their move towards sex, sexuality, spirituality and religion. Reitas found that spiritual colleges are governed by a "hook-up" sensation . It’s been evolved into our culture. Usually consisting of parties, alcohol and largely unrestricted sex. Sexual experience is favored over virginity, but students, especially women, walk a fine line between having too little sexual experience, or too much.
The Hook-Up Culture from a College Student Perspective: A Reflection and Application The culture of human sexuality in college students has many experiences associated with participation. Hook-ups are defined as a non-relationship sexual experience that involves no emotional commitment and is usually quick (Crooks & Baur, 2017). According to Garcia, Reiber, Massey, and Merriwether (2012) outlined the exposure of hookup culture in entertainment such as the film No Strings Attached and television shows such as The L-Word and Queer as Folk.
Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of “casual” sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of personal and Social Relationships, 19, 639-661.
Millennials are constantly criticized by Baby Boomers and Generations X and Y for being risqué and lacking moral integrity and self-restraint, but we are doing the same things that they did when they were in college, it is just deemed more acceptable by our liberal leaning society. Our parents’ generation in college had casual sex as well but the main difference was the number of available partners. It has not been until recent years that women have truly embraced sexual liberation and felt comfortable enough to thoroughly explore their options before entering an intimate, long-term relationship. Not only that, but there are now more women enrolled in college as well. Nationwide, it is currently estimated that there are more women enrolled and enrolling in college than men.
Are relationships in high school truly worth the potential heartache? Answers to this question vary, ranging from the enthusiastic “yes!” to the skeptical view of which cutting off one’s own third toe makes more sense to indifference. Yet, how can the value of a relationship be determined when the tumult of everyday teenage life may result in the potential loss or gain of a new relationship every week? One view may be relationships teenagers enter into are valuable practice for later in life, teaching those which engage in them how to interact with members of the opposite sex in a way which leads to marriage or family. Others, however, state the truism being a significantly low percentage of high school romances result in marriage. Although some may say the benefits outweigh the risks, relationships in high school are not feasible for many and may not be worth the effort put into them.