Don T Blame The Eater Analysis

In David Zinczenko's article “Don't Blame the Eater”, argues that the reason behind individuals turning to fast-food for affordable meals is because there are a lack of alternatives to browse for a healthier way of life. He also raises the question "Where, exactly, are consumers - particularly teenagers – supposed to find alternatives?" David also claims that there are big number of fast-food restaurant all over the country illustrating by giving the example of McDonald’s restaurants. So fast-food is easily available food at any place. David also argues that the fast-food restaurants are the least expensive and most convenient nutrition option we have. David also blames fast-food restaurants for not giving calorie information charts on packages. On the basis of David’s point of view clearly

beating fast food is troublesome; the convenience and affordability, the variety of foods of fast food restaurants is something that can't be replicated effectively in a sound and naturally neighbourly way.

It is very easy to order your meal and cost only 2 or 5 dollars in fast-food restaurants.

But I sincerely doubt that In the event that we look at the market they have a lot of alternatives for nourishments that are nutritious and cheap. Although fast food does make a huge share for restaurants in America, they are not by any means the only restaurants out there. A healthy alternative are veggies, fruits and home cooked meals. It's just a question of going to any market and purchasing something as straightforward as apples and oranges, vegetables and even frozen meals that have their nutritional labels on the package and ingredients so one knows exactly what they are eating. No one holds a gun to someones head and tells them they must eat at a certain place. The individuals who eat at fast food spots, go there by

decision, and decision alone influences what goes into the body. Presently I'm not saying that the companies are innocent, because what they do is sickening, yet every American has the protected right to pick what to put into their bodies. The issue isn't the absence of choices we have available to us, it’s a matter of settling on the choices decision with related to your well-being. It is an individual's decision to go to one of these fast food places, yet it is additionally an alternate decision to go out to eat at a healthier restaurant. The distinction between a fast food salad and a home made salad is the measure of calories they have in them. From Zinczenko's illustration, the salad at one fast food restaurant was said to 1,040 calories, 50% of what a normal individual consumes every day. An option decision would be to eat salad without the unnecessary ingredients or to substitute them with lower calories and fat. If there are no adults present to feed the child, then the adult is responsible for educating them on how to cook for themselves and how to make healthy food choices.