Disadvantages Of Corporate Culture

1098 Words3 Pages

Corporate culture refers to the intuitions and attitudes that shape organizations’ internal and external interactions. Organizational culture can lead to the development of a positive attributes among the employees and their managers. However, it has the potential of generating negative characteristics as indicated in Australian Wheat Board’s gesture of paying bribes to an Iraq. AWB’s organizational culture created an unethical environment whereby financial success preceded the ethical standards outlined in the company’s code of behaviour. The kickback payments to Iraq scandal has since then resulted in the demise of the company. This paper analyses the theory of corporate culture with reference to the Australian Wheat Board and its involvement …show more content…

The visible aspect refers to the external components of organizational culture that can be easily perceived by physical observation such as working environments, compensation, and dress codes. On the other hand, the intrinsic aspect is the invisible elements of the organization that defines the in-depth reality of the organization 's culture like norms, values, and assumptions. The basic underlying assumptions refer to the beliefs and values that are usually overlooked and are the most crucial of the three acceding to Schein (2010). This is because cognitive stability is a fundamental need in the human mind and even the slightest aspect of assumption leads to anxiety and defensiveness. The three levels of corporate culture have been labelled as the cognitive culture (Barsade, 2016). Barsade (2016) emphasized that in addition to cognitive culture, emotional culture is as often forgotten about but is equally important. Emotional culture refers to the “affective norms and feelings” that dictate what emotions are should be shown or suppressed within a company (Barsade, 2016). Successful emotional culture has been linked to higher employee satisfaction and better performance (Barsade, …show more content…

In a strong culture, standards and expectations are clearly outlined and reinforced by senior and middle managers and any inconsistent behavior is immediately called out and dealt with (Hyland, 2016). Zhao (2005) highlighted the importance of managers setting an example for employees and stressed that managers need to live and breathe the intrinsic values in order for the culture to spread to the entire company. Barsade (2016) stated mangers are culture setters who can create or transform entire corporate cultures through high involvement management techniques. Schein (2009) proposed that strong management can solve the issue of having excess number of sub-cultures by reminding and uniting a company under a single vision. Weak management on the other hand whose words don’t match actions create distrust among employees (Zhao, 2005) and perpetuate unwelcome behavior if open communication isn’t present (Hyland,

Open Document