Organizational Climate vs. Organizational Culture

1559 Words4 Pages

Compare and contrast organizational (command) climate with organizational culture.

Leaders have influence the organizational climate and can change the command culture. However to accomplish that they have to first understand the existing organizational culture within which they are operating. Culture is the behavior characteristic of a particular group. In an organizational setting, leaders have to be mindful of this cultural factors in the context that is sensitive to the different backgrounds of team members to best leverage their talent. There are three levels of culture. First level is the Artifacts. This is the surface level. It includes all phenomena that one sees, hears, and feels when one encounters a new group with unfamiliar culture. Second level is the espoused values. These reflect the original values. Third level is the basic underlying assumptions. These are what were once hypothesis, supported only by a hunch or a value, come gradually to be treated as reality. Climate, in the other hand, is a prevailing trend of public opinion or attitude in a given organization at a given time.

Compare

Culture, as well as climate, provides the leaders and the followers a context in which they interact. In turn, both culture and climate a positive organizational environment enabling members to feel better about themselves, have stronger commitments, and produce better work. In addition, culture and climate can affect the organization mission accomplishment either positively or negatively based on its members shared attitudes. In both cases, members’ shared attitude plays a critical part in the motivation and commitment level throughout the organization. Additionally, culture and climate can provide an environme...

... middle of paper ...

...roach, anticipation, operational reach, culmination, arranging operations, and forces and functions. Among those elements end state, center of gravity, and line of effort are particularly useful I developing operational approach. The feeders for operational art are commander’s experience, intellect, creativity, intuition, education, and judgment. However, operational design calls for problem identification, achieving common understanding of the situation and continuous and recursive refinement of situational understanding. Although operational design supports operational art with general methodology, by definition, they both differ by the fact that operational art is application that essentially uses cognitive faculties, whereas operational design is a process that integrates cognitive faculties, tools, and system to conceive of and construct viable approach.

Open Document