Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religion and terrorism the connection
Conflicts between the Middle East and the US
U.S. involvement with the Middle East
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religion and terrorism the connection
Terrorist is a novel by John Updike written in 2006. Ahmad Ashmawy Mulloy, the main character in the story, was instructed in the Muslim faith ever since he was a child of eleven by the Iman Shaikh Rashid, originally from Yemen. The words and teachings of the Qur’an and his devotion to Allah become the centre of Ahmad’s young life which incidentally, lacks all parental guidance. After he graduates from secondary school he gets a job as a truck driver for Excellency Furnishing Stores where he meets Charlie Chehab and his father, from Lebanon and devoted Muslims too. From then on, the young man is manipulated by his elders to perpetrate a terrorist attack against the Lincoln tunnel, below the Hudson River that unites New Jersey with Manhattan, New York. The attack never comes true because Ahmad’s respect and love of a God given life prevail above the Iman’s mandate of hatred towards Americans and their way of life which he had also tried to generate in the boy. There is in the novel an ingredient which stands out namely, the animosity towards Americans, their lifestyle and their ill-fated meddling in Arab countries, experienced by the Iman and the other adults around Ahmad. It is they who are responsible for instilling in the boy the same kind of hostility. This negative sentiment is apparently the driving force for committing such a terrible deed as blowing up the tunnel with everybody inside. The unavoidable question is then, what has generated this state of affairs between these two human groups. Throughout the text one can sense that both parts have reached an impasse where everybody feels terribly bad towards the other group and where they all want to find the way either to inflict pain to the opponent or to protect themselves... ... middle of paper ... ...ord “justice” fit in this picture? I dare say that each one of the factions involved has got an idea of justice totally different from the rest and it is not without a tremendous effort that world leaders will be able to reach consensus and find a solution that everybody feels is fair. Tomás Abraham, Argentinean philosopher, with a slightly skeptical but perhaps realistic tone states: “There are no final solutions. There are only possibilities and that is quite something.” (1747 words) WORKS CITED Chomsky, Noam. El terror como política exterior de Estados Unidos. Buenos Aires: Libros del Zorzal, 2001. Print. Eagleton, Terry. El sentido de la vida (2007) Tr. Albino Mosquera. Barcelona: Paidós, 2008. Print. Said, Edward W. Culture and Imperialism (1993) New York: Vintage Books, 1994. Print. Updike, John. Terrorist. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2006. Print.
Jeffrey David Simon, The Terrorist Trap: America's Experience with Terrorism, 2nd ed. (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2001), 188-89.
The reason I picked this book is because I have always been curious about terrorism. Truthfully, I really didn’t expect the book to take the stance it did, which focused mainly on the religious implications of what influences people to commits acts of terror. I liked the fact that the book takes new angles in approaching the search for truth, by focusing on case studies and performing interviews with the people who have committed terrorist acts. This is like getting the insiders view of the inner workings and frame of mind people have before, during, and after they have unswervingly performed the acts of violence.
In today’s society the word “terrorism” has gone global. We see this term on television, in magazines and even from other people speaking of it. In their essay “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11”, published in 2002, Clark R. Chapman and Alan W. Harris argue that the reaction of the American officials, people and the media after the attacks of 9/11 was completely irrational due to the simple fact of fear. Chapman and Harris jump right into dismembering the irrational argument, often experienced with relationships and our personal analysis. They express how this argument came about from the terrorist being able to succeed in “achieving one major goal, which was spreading fear” among the American people (Chapman & Harris, para.1). The supporters of the irrational reaction argument state that because “Americans unwittingly cooperated with the terrorist in achieving the major goal”, the result was a widespread of disrupted lives of the Americans and if this reaction had been more rational then there would have been “less disruption in the lives of our citizens” (Chapman & Harris, para. 1).
In “Naomi Shihab Nye’s: Letter to Any Would-Be Terrorists”, I do not think numbered her points was an effective technique. Throughout the first page of the article, Nye describes her life growing up with a Palestinian father, while living in the Mexican-American neighborhood. She talks about the serotypes she grew up with, and how the World-Trade Center bombing increase the serotypes for the Middle East. I do not think numbering her points was effective because she did not emphasize them enough. When Nye began with her points, she simply said “1.” Then, wrote her explanation. This did not catch my attention. I did not realize she was labeling each point until her third point. I think if she would have begun her paragraph with “First,” it would
...gh we do not know what that final solution is, we have to be getting closer because we begin to eliminate the wrong ones to progress towards the correct answer. We just will never know how close we are getting even though the possibility remains that we are almost there.
Rothe, D. & Muzzatti, S.L. 2004. Enemies everywhere: Terrorism, moral panic and US civil society. Critical Criminology. 1(12): 327–350.
Chief, two conflicts are established, man vs. man and man vs. man. This is most common with
How does a person know if they fear terrorism because their head tells them to or if it is their gut that tells them to fear it? In his book, The Science of Fear, Daniel Gardner describes this very topic. Gardner explains that our human brains are working both nonconscious and conscious in order to assist us in making decisions (26). According to Gardner these nonconscious decisions are based on our intuition or gut feelings, while conscious decisions are based on logical thinking, those thoughts that can be explained by statistics or probabilities. Terrorism is something seeped in emotion, the very word itself derives from the word terror, which means “a state of intense fear” (“Terror”). Therefore, it is apparent that a person’s fear of terrorism is a person’s gut intuition saying be afraid, be very afraid.
Terrorism is the cause of death and injures in the world, but terrorism is extremely bad for people. Terrorism is all around the world, but not only in public places but also in houses or in politics places. Why do we have terrorism? This question many people ask but you know that terrorism is a business and is like a sport that his own country pay’s to attack other countries. Terrorism is the fear of all the men, women, and children that live in violence. When the twin tower was attacked America was in shock and they wanted justice of whom who have caused it, because they have the fear that something like this will happen again.
On September 11, 2001, the destruction of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon changed the mindset and the opinion of nearly every American on the one of the most vital issues in the 21st century: terrorism (Hoffman 2). Before one can begin to analyze how the United States should combat such a perverse method of political change, one must first begin to understand what terrorism is, where it is derived from, and why there is terrorism. These issues are essential in America’s analysis of this phenomenon that has revolutionized its foreign policy and changed America’s stance in the world.
According to Hocker and Wilmot, Conflict is a fact of human life. It occurs naturally in all kinds of settings. Nations still struggle, families fracture in destructive conflict, marriages face challenges and often fail, and the workplace is plagued with stress, bullying, avoidance of real communication and blaming. (Hocker & Wilmot.,
Law Enforcement and other security professionals should learn from this research that, for the American Front, in order to stop recruitment, and lesson the amount of supporters, is to take the group that’s in prison and shut down there ability to function. Make them not able to recruit new members into the organization, diffuse the situation within. The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia completely run by their drug trafficking cocaine into the United States. If Border Patrol in the United States, and other security agencies could prevent these sales from happening, less American money would have to go into the criminalization process of the drug, and the organization will receive a huge financial crash form not selling there drugs. This would prevent them from growing, and getting more weapons, and weakens them all around.
Pakistan is the basis in the international fight against terrorism to this day. Many Pakistani terrorist groups have made many terrorist attacks around the world. Pakistan faced the choice siding with or staying against the United States during the aftermath of 9/11. Violence in Pakistan has increased for many years as terrorist groups have targeted many political leaders, tribal leaders, the military, and also schools. Pakistan is divided into people who see the country as modern and/o...
On September 11, this nation suffered a vicious surprise attack on its own soil, by people of a different race and culture. We suffered a similar surprise attack sixty years ago, and so the comparisons to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor came immediately. We would do well to pursue the analogy, because the Pearl Harbor attack led to the most massive government-sponsored human rights violation in the United States since the end of slavery. Within a few months of Pearl Harbor, the federal government uprooted all 110,000 people of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast, aliens and U.S. citizens alike, and jailed them in desolate camps in the U.S. interior. With upwards of three million people of Arab descent living in America, we must now ask ourselves: Could it happen again?
Satire on "Abou Ben Adhem" Osama Bin Laden, may his tribe decrease, awoke one night from a dream of shattered peace and saw within the shadows of his room Satan writing in the Book of Doom. Recent successes had made Bin Laden bold. " What writest you?