Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theories of deviancy
Research methodology of terrorism
The concept of moral panics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theories of deviancy
Societies will always have problems that cause some sort of reaction from individuals who believe that their social stability is being endangered. There have been a number of moral panics which have captivated society in terror and more often than not, owing to unfamiliarity. This essay will discuss the perception of a moral panic and will look at the case of the September 11th Terrorist attack against the United States of America, which triggered a colossal conflict of morality within modern day society. This essay will also analyse terrorism as a perceived deviance, the role of the moral entrepreneur and folk devil, in order to develop a level of understanding to the causes of this particular moral panic and its effects on society.
A moral panic can be defined as a phenomenon, frequently initiated by disquieting media and reinforced by responsive laws and public policies, of embellished public concern, angst or anger over a perceived danger to societal order (Krinsky, 2013). The media plays a crucial role in emphasizing a current moral panic. In Jock Young’s chapter Images of Deviance (1971), he comments on the phenomenon of deviance magnification, he deems dramatic media coverage of deviant behaviours to be ironic, owing to the fact that it unintentionally increases rather than restrains the apparent deviance. In hind sight the media create social problems, owing to the fact that they can present them dramatically and are able to do it swiftly (Young & Cohen, 1971: 37).
The appalling nature of the (9/11) terrorist attack was sufficient for the act to be defined as a national threat by then president, George W. Bush. In accordance with Cohen (1972), the first element in defining a moral panic is via a threat to values and ...
... middle of paper ...
...egotiators of drug control as seen in notting hill. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books
Krinsky, C. 2013. Introduction: The Moral Panic Concept.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/123190159/Charles-Krinsky-Introduction-the-Moral-Panics-Concept. [2014, Mar 16].
Dyck, J.J. & Merkowitz, S.P. 2013. The Privacy Generation.
http://www.psmag.com/navigation/politics-and-law/privacy-generation-security-spying-nsa-government-67394/. [2014, Mar 17].
Goode, E. & Yehuda, N. B.1994. Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Herman, E. & Sullivan, G. O.1989. The Terrorism Industry: The Experts and Institutions That Shape Our View of Terror. New York: Pantheon.
Rothe, D. & Muzzatti, S.L. 2004. Enemies everywhere: Terrorism, moral panic and US civil society. Critical Criminology. 1(12): 327–350.
Thompson, K. 1998. Moral Panics. New York: Routledge.
“Moral panic has been defined as a situation in which public fears and state interventions greatly exceed the objective threat posed
Michael Walzer is an esteemed retired professor from the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey. Walzer has written many books, essays, and articles. His essay, Excusing Terror, is one that best relates to the current events happening around the world. In this essay, Walzer talks about different reasons that people would want to resort to terrorism. In this essay I will argue Walzers view on Terrorism is correct in that terrorism is wrong because it is akin to murder, it is random in who it targets, and no one has immunity. I will also offer an objection to Walzer’s theory and explain why it is not a valid one.
Cole, D., & Dempsey, J. X. (2006). Terrorism and the constitution: sacrificing civil liberties in the name of national security. New York: New Press.
In the article, “Moral Panics: Culture, Politics, and Social Construction” the authors Erich Goode and Nachman Ben-Yehuda discuss two different perspectives of moral panics. Each perspective give a different way of looking at how moral panics are portrayed to come about in society. The Objectivist perspective and the Constructionist perspective show how people view moral panics. However, the Constructionist perspective is more important and valuable to society than the Objectivist perspective.
In today’s society the word “terrorism” has gone global. We see this term on television, in magazines and even from other people speaking of it. In their essay “Controlling Irrational Fears After 9/11”, published in 2002, Clark R. Chapman and Alan W. Harris argue that the reaction of the American officials, people and the media after the attacks of 9/11 was completely irrational due to the simple fact of fear. Chapman and Harris jump right into dismembering the irrational argument, often experienced with relationships and our personal analysis. They express how this argument came about from the terrorist being able to succeed in “achieving one major goal, which was spreading fear” among the American people (Chapman & Harris, para.1). The supporters of the irrational reaction argument state that because “Americans unwittingly cooperated with the terrorist in achieving the major goal”, the result was a widespread of disrupted lives of the Americans and if this reaction had been more rational then there would have been “less disruption in the lives of our citizens” (Chapman & Harris, para. 1).
Zedner, L. 2005, "Securing Liberty in the Face of Terror: Reflections from Criminal Justice", Journal of Law and Society, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. pp. 507-533.
September 11, 2001 was one of the most devastating and horrific events in the United States history. Americans feeling of a secure nation had been broken. Over 3,000 people and more than 400 police officers and firefighters were killed during the attacks on The World Trade Center and the Pentagon; in New York City and Washington, D.C. Today the term terrorism is known as the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives (Birzer, Roberson). This term was clearly not defined for the United States for we had partial knowledge and experience with terrorist attacks; until the day September 11, 2001. At that time, President George W. Bush, stated over a televised address from the Oval Office, “Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.” President Bush stood by this statement for the United States was about to retaliate and change the face of the criminal justice system for terrorism.
Moral Panics and the Media. Oxford: Oxford University Goode, E and Ben- Yehuda, N. (1994) Moral Panics. The social construction of deviance. Oxford: Blackwells.
Moral panic comes from the late sixties and was used by sociologist and criminologist to describe an over exaggerated reaction to a type of behaviour that is seen as a threat to values and social problems. Sociologist, thus, used it discover abnormal subjects such as delinquency, youth cultures, subcultures and style as well as vandalism and drugs. Stanley Cohen stated that “moral panics are rather predictable” however, society scarcely notices the problem until is in black and white on the headlines of the news. The media takes small problem than makes seem as a massacre “warning sign of the real, much deeper and more prevalent condition” it could bring to light, when it’s rather not as problematic as media over exaggerates it to be. Moral
Criminal justice through “moral panic” is “a condition, episode, person or groups of person emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests; its nature is presented in a stylized and stereotypical fashion by the mass media; the moral barricades are managed by editors, bishops, politicians, and other right-thinking people; socially accredited experts pronounce their diagnoses and solutions; ways of coping are evolved or (more often) resorted to; the condition then disappears, submerges or deteriorates and become more visible.” (Kraska, 2004) Thus by creating this moral panic, which is an emotion, by involves media, government officials, public, politicians and interested parties that exaggerate the problem from how big the problem really is. “The idea of emotion as a kind of cognitive shortcut explains why jurors, like children are more likely to make emotional judgments than judges.” (Bandes, 311, 1999) Society alone has many emotions towards criminals and victims ranging from hate, anger, fear towards ...
Stanley Cohen, one of sociology’s influential academics in explaining society introduced us to the theory of ‘Moral panics’. A moral panic is defined as when “A condition, episode, person or group of persons emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests” (Cohen (1972), p.46). A ‘folk devil’, a concept closely linked to moral panics is a reminder and example to those in society of what they should not be and how they shouldn’t behave. Examples of folk devils in the past have included ‘mods’ and ‘rockers’ associated with connotations of crime and deviant behaviour. This sociological concept relates to theories of domestic violence due to the way in which it is portrayed in the media, posing a threat to society’s views
Sarah explains how moral panic is evident in this article through the use of a quote referred by philosopher Dickson C.J, "individuals can be persuaded to believe almost anything if the information or ideas are communicated using the right technique … it Is thus not inconceivable that the active dissemination of hate propaganda can attract individuals to its cause”.[3] This shows how the society’s mindset is to be guided towards prosperity, ensuring the possibility to deliver a message to the people. Regardless of the quality of the message, as long as it consistently sounds and presents itself in a manner that is socially applicable to the people. Therefore, Sarah evidently used the socio-legal methods, public law and moral panic to support and enhance her
Cohen’s thesis of his book Folk Devils and Moral Panics argues that moral panics are generated by the media, or by particular interest-groups using the media to publicize their concerns. News media has the ability to control
Terrorism is a threat that plagues our world every day. People are constantly warning travelers to beware of the threats of other nations, but terrorism and violence do not exclusively happen in only a few countries. Unfortunately, violence can be found all around the world. In “Thinking Rationally About Terror,” Lawrence Krauss reports his own experience of dealing with the reality of terrorism in the San Bernardino shooting. I have had a similar experience to Krauss’s when I took an educational trip to France this summer. We were both shaken at the realization that there are people in the world who aim to hurt others, but at the same time we cannot let the radicals achieve their goal of scaring the world.
Concerning terrorism, the issues of ethical standard are extremely valuable because persons do not commit the act of terror in isolation. Terrorism requires context, victim, and ethical standard suggest that we need to understand the conditions and environments that encourage people to become terrorist. (Micheal C. Braswell, 2005)