Critical Analysis Of Tuckman's Theory Of Group Dynamics

972 Words2 Pages

Definition of group dynamics
Group dynamics relate to how each member reacts, behaves and communicates with others in a group and how certain patterns of interaction are formed (Prendiville, 2004). During the group process members adopt transitory or permanent roles where challenging or encouraging others can enhance work and help achieve goals and disruptive roles such as blocking, criticising or sabotaging the group can prove damaging (Prendiville, 2004) and therefore it is essential the facilitator recognises the roles within the group to help enrich the process.
Theory of group dynamics
The writer has chosen to describe Tuckman’s team-developmental model (Tuckman, 1965) to illustrate the dynamics and development of a group. This model includes four stages; of forming, storming, norming and performing as illustrated in the diagram below (www.businessballs.com, 2017).

During …show more content…

The manner in which non-verbal communication is communicated can either enrich or change a message being conveyed. For example, if the facilitator verbally communicates to the group they are relaxed, but has an anxious look on their face, then they are conveying mixed signals. Similarly, if a facilitator stands with their arms folded tightly this could convey to the group they are feeling anxious or fearful, which may interfere with the group process by hindering participation and interaction. As one of the main needs of a group is to feel safe, it is important the facilitator shows they are relaxed but attentive through their use of body language. It may also be productive for a facilitator to sit with the group at times, rather than standing continuously, as this promotes a feeling of equality within the group (Prendiville,

Open Document