Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Drawbacks of corporate social responsibility to a business organisation
Nature of corporate social responsibility
Nature of corporate social responsibility
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is similar to an individual’s social responsibility. An individual who is socially responsible is aware of how their decisions affect the environment. Corporate social responsibility can be define as “how well a company meets its economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary responsibilities” (Peter & Sarah, p. 51). Corporate social responsibility holds businesses accountable to stakeholders such as consumers, in areas of concern such as environmental factors, community and society in general. As a result successful CSR initiatives creates a sustainable company in all ways: financially, ethically, environmentally, and socially. The moral problem with CSR is based on the belief that “CSR would be a cost that would be higher than the perceived benefits. By financially supporting “charity” based initiatives, firms are not performing their fiduciary duty to their stockholders” (Peter & Sarah, p. 49). Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility There are four components to CSR, these components or responsibilities can be arranged in a …show more content…
Patagonia, Inc. is a clothing company which focuses mainly on high-end outdoor gear targeted towards skiers, surfers, climbers, etc. Patagonia is recognized for its exceptional corporate social responsibility contributions to many environmental groups. Patagonia’s mission statement is to “Build the best product, cause no unnecessary harm, use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis” (Company Info). With these values, Patagonia has committed to “donating 1% of their total sales or 10% of their profit, whichever is more, to environmental groups” (Peter & Sarah, p. 390). Patagonia’s common thread initiative that is based on reduce, repair, reuse, recycle, and reimage helps reduce environmental impact. It is this same environment that supports both businesses and
Abstract Patagonia's mission statement is, to use business to inspire and implement solutions to environmental crisis? Patagonia is a clothing company that focus is on selling environmentally safe outdoor apparel. This papers focus is on the history of Patagonia their environmental marketing strategies and their competition. There has also been some outside research done to see what the public perception of Patagonia is. Introduction Patagonia's History In 1957 a young climber named Yvon Chouinard could not find pitons (a form of climbing protection) that he liked.
Corporate Social Responsibility is the obligation from corporations to utilize their resources to aid and benefit the larger society. The four components of CSR are economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic. Social Responsibility is a fundamental force in the wealth creation process. If correctly demonstrated, CSR should heighten competitiveness and boost the value of wealth creation to society. A company's CSR Initiatives directly represent who the company is and what it believes it. The m...
Then in 1996, switched to using organically grown cotton. The company even began to construct wet suits made from renewable bio-rubber unpatented to allow other companies to follow its steps in environmental responsibility. The entire company put its entire line of products as recyclable through it COmmon Threads Partnership, to avoid the waste of materials during its post wear. In 2007 Patagonia begins to protect the environment under its corporate responsibility with its launch of The Footprint Chronicles®, which would trace the social and environmental impact of Patagonia’s products. This caused for and internal retraining of their employees who perform the supply chain visits and audits to fully understand their code of honor. This first step of integrating the environment with human rights led towards the Sustainable Apparel Coalition in 2010, Patagonia gathered top leaders in apparel and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to create an index of how they perform in social and environmental responsibility. This coalition represents a third of the clothing and footwear produced in the world. They also became the first outdoor apparel to work with Fair Trade USA on its Fair Trade Certified apparel which began to expand after its success in India’s mills
“Social responsibility is a business’ obligation to pursue policies, make decisions, and take actions that benefit society” (Williams, 2014, p.78). Not many people are aware of this but one of the leading companies that stand for Corporate Social Responsibility is leading retail store and brand Target. Target Corporation is a retail/food store that was founded February 11, 1902 by Goodfellow Dry Goods and is known today as the second largest discount retailer in the United States. Target’s sole purpose is to fulfill the needs of every single guest that comes in or interacts with Target. Target is a guest friendly retail store that values every single customer, and strives to make sure that every single
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a word that is bandied about with really little regard as to what the full implications actually are. Consider a few thoughts: What exactly is a corporation’s responsibility? Who are the arbiters of CSR for corporations? What does it cost to “rein in” corporations? Why are some companies held to a different standard than others?
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
Patagonia is a long-standing outerwear clothing company. From camping gear, to light fleece, to extreme insulated jackets, Patagonia has been one the main outdoor clothing companies in the last 20 years. It was originally founded by rock climber, Yvon Chouinard, whom created climbing equipment out of his own garage. It then grew to a multinational scale and now they are supplying stores all over the world. But with this large expansion, Patagonia prides itself on the lack of carbon footprint they have. They use recycled materials in their jackets, and they also donate one percent of their profits to the conservation of the environment. The nature-centered ideology is one that has been passed down from generation to generation
According to Mike Peng, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the consideration and response to issues beyond the narrow economic, technical, and legal requirements of the firm to accomplish social benefits along with traditional economic gains the firm seeks. CSR is a way in which a company seeks to achieve a balance between profit, environmental concerns and social imperatives. This is known as the ‘Triple-Botto...
Since the last decade, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been integrated in policy of many companies due to the fact that it helps to increase a positive social impact on people, environment and enhance firm reputation. Most businesspeople seem to agree that CSR provides only advantages; for example, increasing product differentiation that can appeal to consumers, decreasing operating costs in recruiting and retaining employees and reducing turnover costs (The Financial Times). However, companies appear to have a hidden agenda - an underlying financial purpose - behind CSR. For this reason, this essay will indicate contradictions against CSR and will argue that corporations which practice CSR do not always perform well financially.
I begin this essay by defining CSR, there are many definitions for this term by various different theorists, and EU says that CSR is "A concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis." On the other hand, Sloman et al. define it as "The concept in which a firm takes into account is the interests and concerns of a community rather than just its shareholder". Davis and Blomstrom (1966), say it "Refers to a person’s obligation to consider the effects of his decisions and actions on the whole social system". These definitions differ from one another in many ways but they agree that CSR involves taking the environment into account and therefore, one must look take social responsibility.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the corporate event sector can be for everyone operating in this sector a basis for innovations, opportunities and competitive advantages with regard to social, environmental and economic aspects. This essay deals with the question what CSR is and how it influences the corporate event industry in the UK, as well as with the strategies companies have to do to generate a sustainable company structure and how they can advise their workforce to improve responsibility. Furthermore, the right communication of a CSR company structure is an essential aspect and how it has negative or positive effects on the people. The Global aspect of CSR is also interesting with regard to the corporate event industry and the implementation of the ISO 20121.
While the concept of an individual having responsibility is commonly recognized, modern views have lead to the emerging issue of corporate responsibility. Business Directory.com defines corporate social responsibility as, “A company’s sense of responsibility towards the community and environment (both ecological and social) in which it operates. Companies express this citizenship (1) through their waste and pollution reduction processes, (2) by contributing educational and social programs, and (3) by earning adequate returns on the employed resources.” But such a concept has been much disputed since at least the 1970’s.
Business organizations regularly run into demands from various stakeholders groups when conducting day-to-day business. These demands are generated from employees, customers, suppliers, community groups, governments, and shareholders. Thus, according to Goodpaster, any person or group of people that can shape or can be shaped by attainment of the objectives by an organization is considered a stakeholder. Most business organizations recognize and understand their responsibilities to these groups and endeavor to honor and fulfill them. These responsibilities are often communicated to the public by a statement of principles or beliefs. For many business organizations, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential and integral part of their business. Thus, this paper discusses the two CSR views: the classical view and the stakeholder view. Furthermore, I believe that the stakeholder view has brought ethical concerns to the forefront of businesses, and an argument shall be made that businesses would improve both socially and economically if CSR, guided by God’s love, was integrated into their strategic planning.
CSR has become a significant part of the construct of any successful business, there are a multitude of facets that are necessary and have a true significance. One must acknowledge the importance of social responsibility. To overlook the significance of CSR would be jeopardizing the functionality of a business, it would also deteriorate the stability of trust in an organization not simply just between customer and business; there too could be a breakdown in this important relationship between stockholders and other significant entities within an organization. Implementation of a sound CSR construct can also help to protect a business from negative and damaging
Corporate Social Responsibility is an organisation’s obligation to serve the company’s own interest and the one’s of the society. Moreover, Corporate Social Responsibility has a definition of a concept where the companies integrate social and the environmental concerns into their own business operation and also on a basis of voluntary with their interactions they have with the stakeholders. Corporate Social Resp...