Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The nature of csr in a business
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The nature of csr in a business
Since the last decade, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been integrated in policy of many companies due to the fact that it helps to increase a positive social impact on people, environment and enhance firm reputation. Most businesspeople seem to agree that CSR provides only advantages; for example, increasing product differentiation that can appeal to consumers, decreasing operating costs in recruiting and retaining employees and reducing turnover costs (The Financial Times). However, companies appear to have a hidden agenda - an underlying financial purpose - behind CSR. For this reason, this essay will indicate contradictions against CSR and will argue that corporations which practice CSR do not always perform well financially. Business Responsibility consists of three main aspects to be considered which are profit, society and environment. A way of operating business with responsibility does not only act strategically and manage a business ethically, but to achieve long-term sustainability. Investing in such activities that mainly focus on communities, such as improving quality of life and developing people’s potential, which these might also be another interesting option of using CSR to become successful in business. Business and society belong together; if strong society and well living people merge, of course, those will drive business in that society to move towards a better position. Since business is a part of society, it needs support from people who are consumers. On the other hand, despite the fact that CSR is receiving much attention globally, it has become a trend in business. CSR objectives might distort and turn to be a new tool for social marketing. We all know that everything always ha... ... middle of paper ... ...ticing CSR (Part 2). CSRI, March 6, 2010. CSR06 (2006). FAQ : The International Corporate Social Responsibility Conference. Retrieved September 17, 2011, from http://www.csr06.ro/faq.php The Economist (2005). The Union of Concerned Executives. The Economist, January 20, 2005. Ferguson, M.A. (2010). Why CSR Can’t Help BP Now. Forbes, June 25, 2010. The Financial Times. Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility. Retrieved September 18, 2011, from http://lexicon.ft.com/Term?term=business-case-for-corporate-social-responsibility Lewis, R. (2006). Firms’ CSR Work Fails To Excite Public. PR Week UK, November 8, 2006. Mesicek, D. (2010). Is Corporate Social Responsibility just a Marketing Stunt?. Venture Definite, August 6, 2010. Retrieved September 18, 2011, from http://venturedefinite.com/is-corporate-social-responsibility-just-a-marketing-stunt/
...Foundational Considerations in the Corporate Social Responsibility Debate’, Business Horizons, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 9-18.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the way a corporation achieves a balance between its economic, social, and environmental responsibilities in its operations so as to address shareholder and other stakeholder expectations. In general, when firms hold this wider encouraging role on the public by being engaged with stakeholders, a variety of profit can be produced for both company and the stakeholders. A key inclination is the combination of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into the organization strategy, culture, mission and communications. By incorporating corporate citizenship into the company it is no longer an additional “nice thing to do” or something made to obey laws or regulations. Instead, corporate responsibility has become something business leaders and workforce want to engage in, frequently because executives who believe in the long-term see business profit. The four types of social responsibilities a...
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) invaded the corporate world over the last few decades. This concept has become an essential need for competitive advantage unlike its original role as a nicety. The companies have seen the business benefit of the initiative and stakeholders have appreciated the initiative. This has led to the wide application in the firm’s operational agenda.
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
Companies have presented investigations about their motivation towards voluntarily social and environmental as insolvent. This paper argues in agreement with Adam’s view that the goal of CSR reporting is to promote credibility and corporate image of stakeholders operating in a particular industry. Whereas companies must focus their efforts on enhancing their profitability, they should also ensure that the welfare of other stakeholders is protected.
In order to critique the significance of this initiatives for business success the term(s) CSR / Sustainability first need defining, however this could be viewed as problematic in itself as in is in fact not one term but two. Several authors Gatti and Steele 2014, Jones Hillier and Comfort 2014 xxxxxxxx give thought to give thought to the terminology surrounding CSR discussing that confusion that could arise from the development of multiple terms used to attempt to conceptualise and illustrate the most ethical business practice, incorporating environmental and social issues. McWilliams and Siegel (2001) define the term of CSR as activities or best practices that “appear to further some social good, beyond the interests of the firm and that which is required by law” whereas a more simplified term is used by the European commission as “the responsibilities of enterprise for their impacts on society” (Khan and Kakabadse, 2013)
I begin this essay by defining CSR, there are many definitions for this term by various different theorists, and EU says that CSR is "A concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis." On the other hand, Sloman et al. define it as "The concept in which a firm takes into account is the interests and concerns of a community rather than just its shareholder". Davis and Blomstrom (1966), say it "Refers to a person’s obligation to consider the effects of his decisions and actions on the whole social system". These definitions differ from one another in many ways but they agree that CSR involves taking the environment into account and therefore, one must look take social responsibility.
The arguments for and against corporate social responsibility have captured two points of view. Those who believe that organizations should not be concerned about social responsibility base many of their arguments on the costs involved and whether organizations should shoulder those costs on behalf of society. And those who are in favor feel that organizations benefit from society and, therefore, have an obligation to improve it. Although there is no universal agreement, surveys and other reports express that many organizations are, becoming increasingly active in addressing social
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a very familiar term in today’s world. Most of the successful companies try to be ethical and socially responsible toward their stakeholders. Because becoming ethical and socially responsible gains a lot in terms of profit or capturing more market share (Aras and Crowther,2009). This socially responsible approach is paved by the CSR activities of the companies which has a great contribution to their corporate strategy of winning the customers’ mind. In this assignment, the pros and corn of CSR activities of a particular organization a...
Pohle, G (2008, Feb, 12) IBM Study: Corporate Social Responsibility. retrieved May 6 2014, from YouTube Web Site: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdkYieDuVvY
Business organizations regularly run into demands from various stakeholders groups when conducting day-to-day business. These demands are generated from employees, customers, suppliers, community groups, governments, and shareholders. Thus, according to Goodpaster, any person or group of people that can shape or can be shaped by attainment of the objectives by an organization is considered a stakeholder. Most business organizations recognize and understand their responsibilities to these groups and endeavor to honor and fulfill them. These responsibilities are often communicated to the public by a statement of principles or beliefs. For many business organizations, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential and integral part of their business. Thus, this paper discusses the two CSR views: the classical view and the stakeholder view. Furthermore, I believe that the stakeholder view has brought ethical concerns to the forefront of businesses, and an argument shall be made that businesses would improve both socially and economically if CSR, guided by God’s love, was integrated into their strategic planning.
Now-a-days it is considered that CSR is one of the major concerns of organization’s business ethics. Companies increasingly increase their corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical management accepting the positive impact on the bottom line. The vast bulk of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies publish sustainability reports unfolding their program challenges and achievements. These pre-emptive efforts can pr...
Bowie, (1991) New directions in corporate social responsibility - moral pluralism and reciprocity, Business Horizons, 34, 4 pp.56-65
...e, L (eds) 2008, Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context, Abdingdon, Routledge.
In the current time of growth and progression, individuals should know that how a business not only flourish but sustain itself. Making profit is one of the main targets of every corporates but it must not be the only one. When an individual builds a company in order to do business, they should be well aware of their contribution towards the society as well as their business and employees in it. It is total strategy of all. We should be able to realize every increment contributes of it. One of the major factors that affect a business is how well it participates in Corporate Social Responsibility. According to (Werther & Chandler, 2006) corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to a business practice that involves participating in initiatives that benefits the society. In authenticity, there is a whole lot to argue about it. There are no major guidelines that decides either a business is participating in Corporate Social Responsibility; what might be considered a Business practicing CSR to some, can still not be accepted for it by others. CSR may be restrained a term which his highly flexible. This paper will discuss about Corporate Social Responsibility and its