Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting Companies have presented investigations about their motivation towards voluntarily social and environmental as insolvent. This paper argues in agreement with Adam’s view that the goal of CSR reporting is to promote credibility and corporate image of stakeholders operating in a particular industry. Whereas companies must focus their efforts on enhancing their profitability, they should also ensure that the welfare of other stakeholders is protected. Previous literature offers a revelation on various competing theories based on why companies make voluntarily report and engagements in corporate social responsibility. The major perspectives considered are within the scope of application include accountability and image promotion. Many studies hold consequential evidence towards accountability to shareholders making it difficult for organizations to distinguish relevance from accountability based on continued practice. The absence of actual legitimacy crises makes it hard to identify voluntarily reporting as a proactive measure in preventing future crises and reporting based on accountability stakeholders demand (Bebbington, Larringa-Gonzalez & Moneva, 2008). Retrospective approaches typically deal with the reactive forms of legitimacy in which companies face related crises and do not consider the firms as on-going efforts in reporting on the CSR performance and lack of ascertained crises. The concept explores underlying motivations for CSR reporting with cautious reference to the engagement of the companies. Engagement-based CSR efforts draw conclusions on surveys and interviews and offer valuable insights towards internal structures as well as views from reporters (Adams, 2002). In such r... ... middle of paper ... ...ng major objectives for firms and attaining ability of balanced conflicting and demands for firm stakeholders. In conclusion, theories and practices in CSR reporting are multi-faceted while systems perspectives embodied in the assumptions are acknowledged through political economy dynamics. The research in corporate social disclosure utilizes legitimacy goals and questions the viability and ethical nature of the process. The critique is an outcome of the application of CSR principles through the assumption that organizations perceive threats to their legitimate status. In the development and broadening of the CSR scope and disclosure expectations, firms introduce comprehensive forms of corporate social reporting. In such a case, issues of voluntary corporate social reporting are exercised as accountability responses to stakeholders and part of a legitimating process.
Our textbook defines corporate social responsibility as “a business's concern for the welfare of society” (Nickels, 102) and that it “goes well beyond being ethical. It is based on a commitment to integrity, fairness, and respect” (102). By performing a social audit they can evaluate whether or not their policies and actions are actually providing the support they’re attempting to
Whilst many firms’ Corporate Responsibility efforts prove to be counterproductive, pitting business against society and pressuring companies to think of generic CSR responses, addressing social issues by creating shared value for both society and the firm can ultimately increase profitability and operational sustainability (Kramer, 2006). In the case of Cameco, the corporation’s 5 pillar strategy demonstrates a strategic ethics policy (Moroz et al, 2015), its focus on creating shared-value enhancing the overall effectiveness of business operations in terms of increased worker productivity through improved working and living environments, and increased revenue due to more efficient operations. As measures of stakeholder power, strategic posture, and economic performance are significantly linked to levels of corporate social disclosure (Roberts, 1992), it is evident that adopting wholesome ethical processes in business practices can aid U92 in the achievement of business
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a movement that aims to promote a greater awareness of how business activities and decisions influence corporate environment, stakeholders, and society in general. Adam Lindgreen and Valerie Swaen’s article “Corporate Social Responsibility” addresses this broad topic in a more narrow direction of CSR implementation as it discusses the most important stages of this process. While this article relies only on the previous research, it provides unique insights into CSR and even challenges the common views of this concept as the authors thoroughly analyze their secondary sources.
There is major concern for corporate management whether there is a direct relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. There is need for assessing the validity of the relationship between CSR and financial performance .Macguire, sundgren and schneweels (1986) argued that previous research has yielded mixed results regarding the relationship between CSR and measures of financial performance. Reviews by Cochran and Wood (1984) and Ullman have all found mixed results regarding the relationship between CSR and a firm’s financial performance. Ullman suggested that the results may have been derived from differences in research methodologies and measures of financial performance
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the way a corporation achieves a balance between its economic, social, and environmental responsibilities in its operations so as to address shareholder and other stakeholder expectations. In general, when firms hold this wider encouraging role on the public by being engaged with stakeholders, a variety of profit can be produced for both company and the stakeholders. A key inclination is the combination of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into the organization strategy, culture, mission and communications. By incorporating corporate citizenship into the company it is no longer an additional “nice thing to do” or something made to obey laws or regulations. Instead, corporate responsibility has become something business leaders and workforce want to engage in, frequently because executives who believe in the long-term see business profit. The four types of social responsibilities a...
In recent years, companies are becoming socially responsible and now stakeholders almost expect a company to have CSR policies. Therefore, in twentieth century, corporate social responsibility (CSR) became an important development in public life (Barnett, ND).Corporate social responsibility is defined as “the ways in which an organisation exceeds the minimum obligations to stakeholders specified through regulation and corporate governance” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). Stakeholders can be defined as “those individuals or groups who depend on the organisation to fulfil their own goals and on whom, in turn, the organisation depends” (Johnson, Schools and Whittington, N.D cited in March, 2012). There are many purposes for this essay, the first purpose is to descried the key principles of corporate social responsibility and explain their importance for stakeholders. Secondly, is to show how far this company follows those principles in order to be accountable to at least three of its stakeholders. In this essay, three stakeholders, environment, customers and employees will be evaluated respectively and the key principles of the stakeholders will be examined.
Earlier research by Bhattacharya and Sen (2004) showed that informing stakeholders is the only way to positively influence the attitude and behaviour of stakeholders regarding the organization and its CSR policies and/or business activities. Positively influence of the attitude and behaviour of stakeholders is also important organisations want to attract highly skilled and qualified workers. This is important because “the success of a business ultimately relies on the type of employees who work there (Blackman, 2006, p. 367)”.
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
I begin this essay by defining CSR, there are many definitions for this term by various different theorists, and EU says that CSR is "A concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis." On the other hand, Sloman et al. define it as "The concept in which a firm takes into account is the interests and concerns of a community rather than just its shareholder". Davis and Blomstrom (1966), say it "Refers to a person’s obligation to consider the effects of his decisions and actions on the whole social system". These definitions differ from one another in many ways but they agree that CSR involves taking the environment into account and therefore, one must look take social responsibility.
Virakul, B., Koonmee, K. and McLean, G., 2009. CSR activities in award-winning Thai companies. Social responsibility journal, 5(2), pp.178--199.
Different types of theoretical perspectives have been used over the years to justify why business organizations involved in CSR activities and voluntarily disclose of CSR information (Patten 1991; Arman& Siti-Nabiha 2009; Bayound et sl.2012). These CSR theoretical perspectives can be categorized into positive accounting theory and normative accounting theory. Normative accounting is a theory to prescribe how an accounting particular practices should be undertaken (Deegan and Unerman 2011). Kristian (2013) argued that normative theories lacking empirical background because they are not based on observations. In contrast, positive accounting theory is based on logical deduction (empirical observations).Therefore, it concentrates on the relationships between individuals who provide resources to a company (stakeholders) and how accounting is used to these relationships (Deegan and Unerman, 2011).
A corporations CSR should be shaped in order to fit the goals of the corporation, although every corporation’s CSR should differ, since most have different goals and different communities behind them. The CSR should be molded into fitting the corporation’s goals in order to make it easier on the corporation in giving back to the community while achieving its goals. For example, a corporation located in a desert wishes to be more efficient, by reducing water usage it is not only creating lower costs, which result in higher revenue, but also helps the community by not taking up so much water. Taking this into consideration, it is critical that the corporation goals and values are established and clear throughout the corporation, they should be developed by the board or directors and CEO, and the highest managerial level should stress their importance to the rest of the corporation. By making the goals and values at the top branch of the corporate hierarchy, it will be simpler for the corporates community to develop in order to nurture those goals and values. Therefore, a corporation can reach the “shared-value,” a value for both its shareholders and community in a simpler manner that can result benefiting the corporation in the end as well. Throughout the article many examples are given of actual corporations that have benefited and changed their CSR in order to fit their goals, therefore, providing solid proof that these methods work. Nevertheless, as acknowledged by the author’s themselves, most of the corporations taken into consideration where one’s that Harvard CSR students were employed
Business organizations regularly run into demands from various stakeholders groups when conducting day-to-day business. These demands are generated from employees, customers, suppliers, community groups, governments, and shareholders. Thus, according to Goodpaster, any person or group of people that can shape or can be shaped by attainment of the objectives by an organization is considered a stakeholder. Most business organizations recognize and understand their responsibilities to these groups and endeavor to honor and fulfill them. These responsibilities are often communicated to the public by a statement of principles or beliefs. For many business organizations, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential and integral part of their business. Thus, this paper discusses the two CSR views: the classical view and the stakeholder view. Furthermore, I believe that the stakeholder view has brought ethical concerns to the forefront of businesses, and an argument shall be made that businesses would improve both socially and economically if CSR, guided by God’s love, was integrated into their strategic planning.
As a result of modern corporate scandals and rapid development of international business environments, social responsibility (SR) has become a key aspect of corporate competitive contexts. (Brammer, Williams and Zinkin, 2007). Businesses are under increasing pressure to incorporate SR amongst their profit-driven aims and have become increasingly accountable for their social and environmental actions. Increased interest in CSR developed in the mid 1990s as consumers began to lack their former trust in companies due to both environmental and financial scandals and it became noticeable that society was moving towards values incorporating harmony, quality of life and environmental conservation (Carrasco, 2007) Additionally, major corporate failures over the past two decades have resulted in increased demand for stronger, corporate governance (CG) rules. (Sui, Wright & Evans, 2007). Superior CG rules are needed in order to preserve the integrity of corporations, financial institutions and markets and the health and stability of world economies. (OECD Website)
Now-a-days it is considered that CSR is one of the major concerns of organization’s business ethics. Companies increasingly increase their corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical management accepting the positive impact on the bottom line. The vast bulk of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies publish sustainability reports unfolding their program challenges and achievements. These pre-emptive efforts can pr...