Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of social responsibility
Short note on corporate social responsibility
Introduction to corporate social responsibility
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of social responsibility
WHAT IS SOCIAL RESPONSIBILTY? The company should embrace its social responsibility and not to be solely focused on maximizing the profit. The welfare of the firm’s employees, customers and the communities should be safeguarded. Companies have the ethical responsibility to provide a safe working environment for their entire employees and avoid polluting the environment and also to produce safe products. It is also increasingly being used as a measure of overall company’s performance. According to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) this relationship to the society and environment in which they operate is a serious factor in their ability to continue to operate effectively. IMPORTANCE OF SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TO A CORPORATION …show more content…
Public image is an important key factor for the corporations. Most of the consumers will not do the business with the corporation if they do not have any corporate social responsibility plans. Corporate social responsibility is important for every firm. If the firm is involved in donating funds or goods to local nonprofit organizations, charity or schools and if the raw materials they used in their products are environmentally safe so consumers will be more willing to buy the products from such firms and will be satisfied too. BETTER AND MORE MEDIA COVERAGE: - Media coverage is important for the corporations as they show their clear image to the public. If the corporations are fulfilling their social responsibilities and media does not show to the public the public will be unaware of it. So the corporations should form relationships with the media. Media covers all the actions of the corporations and then shows the news to the public whether it is a bad news or good
Social responsibility can be defined as “the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large” (Mallen Baker, 2004). In addition, social responsibility has been defined differently by various corporate leaders that provide guidelines which impacts how one manages the core business. Social responsibility is an essential part of a business. If managed correctly should strengthen the competitive spirit of the company and provide prosperity to society.
The famous scandals facing the corporate world that is Enron and WorldCom brought a lot of disruptions to their operations. This brought about strict government regulations, as a result. This also marked as the reminder for NGOs to begin criticizing MNCs. This brought about ranking that necessitated firms to submit their non-financial performance records alongside their financial performance ones. The media has also become a close checker on companies. This has brought the need for firms to embrace social responsibility in their operations to curb battling with restrictors. Firms have also established good relations with their suppliers both as a prerequisite for effective business and as a social responsibility. (Cetinkaya, 2010)
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
Before evaluating the writing of these authors, it would seem appropriate to state the generally accepted definitions of the terms “social responsibility” and “business ethics”. Paraphrased from several different sources, business ethics can be defined as the written (and frequently ‘unwritten’) principles that guide the actions and decisions of a company. Mainly driven by the organizational culture, they determine both the good and bad behavior and set the standards for decision making. In its most basic form, business ethics comes down to knowing the difference between right and wrong and choosing to do what is right because it is right rather than simply avoiding what is wrong because of its negative r...
In the article, The Truth About CSR by Kasturi Rangan, Lisa Chase, and Sohel Karim, the importance that coherence plays in corporate social responsibility (CSR), is emphasized. Throughout the article, corporate social responsibility application, within corporations, is broken down into three theaters. According to the article, many corporations do not focus on their CSR programs, and usually see these CSR actions as a secondary responsibility following the responsibility they hold towards their shareholders. It is argued in the article that in CSR is a key and essential block for corporate success, focusing on CSR coherence throughout all three theaters will bring positive results along the way, possibly making the corporation
Company X is a plastic injection molding manufacturer located in Highland, Michigan. The company had started in 2005 and survived the hard economic times. Company X started out by first doing applique and added 6 months ago injection molding. There are two owners, and there are less than 75 employees. Every company small or large should take social responsibility.
There is a link between corporate social responsibility and the key principles of the stakeholders, which a company should follow to be responsible to its stakeholders. The first stakeholder is environment and the key principle used for it is not damage the environment for example, recycling, dealing correctly with their wastes and emissions. The second stakeholder is the employees. The key principle for the employees is companies providing safe and health working conditions for their staff. Moreover, the employees earn an appropriate salary for ...
According to Grayson (2003), there is a rising trend amongst the academicians as well as the professionals about social responsibility and ethics in marketing. The marketers and MNCs operating in different spheres and regions all over the world have started realizing the significance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and ethics in marketing along with their role in carrying out the business that takes care of the community’s interest at the same time maximizing the profit levels of their companies (Matten & Moon, 2004). Moreover, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the ongoing commitment of the business to perform ethically and play a part in economic development at the same time enhancing the quality of life of the staff members and their families and of the local community as well as the society as a whole. Here society implies towards people and customers at large. It is basically an expression employed to illustrate what some view as an organization’s responsibility to be responsive to the requirements of all the stakeholders associated with its business operations (Labbai, 2007). Additionally, in simplest words it implies “what company does, how it does it and when and what people say. Ethics and Social responsibility are combined together and applied in a number of disciplines of management like HR, computer, Finance and many others etc (Grayson, 2003). Further, taking the above discussion into consideration this particular paper attempts to throw light on the concept of social responsibility and ethics in sustainable marketing.
The arguments for and against corporate social responsibility have captured two points of view. Those who believe that organizations should not be concerned about social responsibility base many of their arguments on the costs involved and whether organizations should shoulder those costs on behalf of society. And those who are in favor feel that organizations benefit from society and, therefore, have an obligation to improve it. Although there is no universal agreement, surveys and other reports express that many organizations are, becoming increasingly active in addressing social
When the problem became serious two main views formed: the “narrow” view and the “broader” view, based on different ideas. The “narrow” view is based on the proposition that corporations have no social responsibility and they have only one main purpose, to make a profit (Friedman, 1970). So corporations should remain socially independent and all conflicts must be solved through the individual responsibility concept. On the contrary the “broader” view states that corporations have social obligations as all existing participants of market, persons and entities are tied together and are mutually dependent. So corporations cannot ignore some serious events or problems, which take place, and must help society, as profit is not their single purpose.
Corporations that place an importance on corporate social responsibility usually have an easier experience when dealing with politicians and government regulators. In compare, businesses that present an irresponsible disregard for social responsibility tend to find themselves fending off various reviews and probes, often brought on at the assertion of public service organizations. The more positive the public insight is that a corporation takes social responsibility seriously; the less likely it is that innovative groups will launch public campaigns and claim government inquiries against it.
Corporate Social Responsibility is all about the effort that a company applies that might be more what is being required by the environmental protection groups. Also, it is a responsibility that a company should take for its effects on the environment and on an impact for a social well-being. Moreover, Corporate Social Responsibility it is all about the ways that the companies manage with the process of their business which gives a positive influence on the society. Generally, the companies have to give an answer for their operation process such as the quality of their company’s management of the people and also, the quantity of the company’s impact in different areas of the society.
If the separation is the terminology of CSR(Corporate Social Responsibility), Corporate is the company or organizing that aims to profit. Social is a group of people who are related or have a common way of either natural include other living thing and environment surrounding. Responsibility is a duty is engaged to prevent and improve the bad results include the creation and maintenance of good results, which impact the stakeholder groups. Now a CSR project has been a collaboration of many organizations in many companies, so that everyone is aware of the rewards that made us live a good day. Activities related to corporate social responsibility in my activities consist of environmental responsibility, social responsibility and economic responsibility.
The Social Environment Ethics and Social Responsibilities ---------------------------------- Ethics are moral principles and judgements that many people believe should be considered when a business makes any decision (for example, what is ‘right’ and ‘wrong’? What is ‘good’ and ‘bad’?). Social Responsibilities are the duties that a business has towards the people who are affected by its activities, for example, customers, employees, suppliers, and the local community. A ‘good’ business is deemed to be one which acts in a socially responsible fashion, and takes ethical decisions and actions at all times.
It is important to understand the importance of corporate social responsibilities. If Corporate Social Responsibility is properly maintained and emphasized by companies, it can benefit the society, economy and corporate sustainability. It can also be cost efficient to companies. also the environment . But above all effect (CSR) varies companies to companies. Where some corporates seem to make all sorts of benefits from their coporate social responsibilities but few of them are also having loss by trying to maintain CSR without properly evaluating their resources. (Porter and Kramer 2006) has said The inferences where corporates need to evaluate their CSR actions to figure out if they add