Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast hagia sophia and pantheon
Comparing the church of Hagia Sophia to the dome of the rock
Comparing the church of Hagia Sophia to the dome of the rock
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare and contrast hagia sophia and pantheon
Every civilization since the dawn of time has erected structures of some sort to live, work and store things in. Though the majority of the structures forged during ancient times were purely for practical usage and not intended to be aesthetically pleasing, over the years, architecture has evolved into a craft which encourages artistry and imagination. Architects often incorporate design elements from antiquated structures in their modern designs, but often this is not the only source of inspiration; the history and meaning behind a building can also provide some influence. Two examples of such structures are the modern Cathedral of Christ the Savior which takes on both design and sentimental elements from The Hagia Sophia. While the two buildings share architectural similarities, more interesting is their common ground of having turbulent and somewhat poignant sagas in their past.
The
…show more content…
It took several decades to complete, and since its consecration by the Russian Orthodox Church in 2000, the Cathedral has dominated the skyline as a stunning symbol of status, as well as a reverent reminder of The Cathedral’s turbulent and tense history. “The Cathedral of Christ the Savior in Moscow is an emblematic event in post-communist Russia’s effort to come to terms with its totalitarian past. Initially erected to celebrate Russia’s victory over Napoleon, the cathedral is an iconic building whose nineteenth-century construction glorified the unity of the state, the Orthodox religion, and the people.” (Haskins, Russia's Postcommunist Past, 26). The first construction of The Cathedral was commissioned by Tsar Alexander I
Q: Use St Peter’s basilica and Donato Bramante’s Tempietto in Rome, in opposition to John Balthasar Neumann’s Pilgrimage Church of Vierzehnheiligen in Bamburg, Germany, to argue that a rational engagement with architecture is a more effective means to comprehend and understand architectural form.
Although the Pantheon and the Cathedral of Chartres are both some of the greatest architectural advances in history they are very different. We can compare the time that each of the buildings was built, where and for who they were built for, and why they were built. Another thing we can compare is the structure of the buildings and the type of material they are built from.
The Hagia Sophia was constructed first and it was meant as the main church of the Byzantine Empire. It is said that they built the Hagia Sophia in only 5 years, while it took nearly a century for the Notre Dame cathedral to be completed. While it did have what some would consider an extremely short construction time, they did have many issues with the dome. It nearly collapsed more than a few times. Once the builders and architects figured a plan to keep it stable, one on looker said, ”it is as if the Dome is suspended from Heaven itself”. The Dome of the rock was constructed for Christians, Jews, and Muslims but was to attract new followers to Malik’s Islamic brotherhood. The project for the construction had many issues, not only with the Dome itself, but also with revolts that would postpone construction for years. Once completed, many followers believed that Jerusalem was the third holiest place in the world due to Muhammed’s journey to Heaven in order to talk to God. The art within the Hagia Sophia was beautiful Mosaics and paintings of the Virgin Mary with Jesus. These were meant to represent how holy the building was. When the Muslims claimed the Hagia Sophia they did not want to destroy it due to beliefs so they renovated the building. They did this by breaking down images of humans and animals due to their belief that no images of figures
...ral (138 ½ feet), Michelangelo’s St. Peter’s (137 ½) and Wren’s St. Paul’s (109 feet). Until steel and concrete technology advanced in the 19th century, no single spaces were larger than these. Bibliography Dirimtekin, Feridun. [1964]. Saint Sophia Museum. Istanbul: Touring and Automobile Club of Turkey. Fossati, Gaspare. 1852. Aya Sofia, Constantinople : as recently restored by order of H. M. the sultan Abdul-Medjid. London: R. & C. Colnagni & Co. James Stevens Curl. Classical Architecture: an introduction to its vocabulary and essentials, with a select glossary of terms. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1992. ISBN 0-442-30896-5. NA260.C87. interior photo of circular space (photo of the prostyle octstyle portico of the Pantheon) William L. MacDonald. The Architecture of the Roman Empire I. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982. ISBN 0-300-02818-0. LC 81-16513
Construction spanning one hundred and eight years, the final result is magnificent. Having had many different architects working on the project, changing after either the leading Pope would die or the architect, it is a wonder the plans for the basilica came together and that the building has lasted so long. The original basilica, built by Emperor Constantine in the fourth century is the foundation to this building. To those of the christian faith, this building is the epitome of belief. St Peter’s Basilica is from where the catholic faith