Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
First degree murder case study
First degree murder case study
First degree murder case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: First degree murder case study
Wilbert Colin Thatcher was born August 25, 1938, in Toronto Ontario. Colin Thatcher studied Agriculture at the University of Saskatchewan, and later transferred to Iowa State University where he graduated with a Bachelor of Science and Masters in Agriculture. It was during this time at Iowa State University that he met his wife JoAnn Wilson. The couple married in 1962 and relocated to Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan. In 1971, during the grieving of his father’s death, Thatcher cultivated his interest in politics. Son of the Premier W. Ross Thatcher, Colin followed in his father’s footsteps emerging as a political figure in the Liberal party and later the Progressive Conservative Party. While JoAnn cared for their three children, and simultaneously …show more content…
worked three jobs, Thatcher was elected to the provincial legislature and in 1982 was appointed Minister of Energy and Mines. The Thatcher marriage began to sour in the late 1970’s with reports of physical abuse which ended in divorce. Colin Thatcher’s home life had fallen apart, however, he maintained his political position until his resignation four days prior to his ex-wife’s murder. On the evening of January 21st 1983, JoAnn left a work meeting and was headed home.
This was the last time anyone reportedly saw Thatcher’s ex-wife alive. Less than an hour later a passerby discovered her beaten body lying in a pool of blood inside her own garage. She had been bludgeoned and shot in her Regina home. Speculation arose that Thatcher was in some way involved, though he was not formally charged until May 7, 1984. Colin Thatcher was charged on the grounds that he unlawfully caused the death of JoAnn Wilson contrary to s. 218 of the Criminal Code . Section 218(1) of the Code provides that,“every one who commits first degree murder or second degree murder is guilty of an indictable offence and shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life.” Section 214 classifies murder into two types: first degree murder and second degree murder. First degree murder is described as an intentional killing that is planned and deliberate. Second degree murder is described as an intentional killing that is not premeditated or planned, nor committed in a reasonable "heat of …show more content…
passion.” In the trial the Crown used direct and circumstantial evidence to prove that the appellant had personally murdered his ex‑wife or he aided or abetted the killer and was therefore guilty as he had taken part in the crime. The bulk of the evidence was consistent with the theory’s of the crown. These theories were based on four main pieces of evidence; During their investigation immediately following the killing, the police found a Shell Oil credit card receipt lying on top of the snow some eight feet from the southeast door of the garage. The receipt bore what appeared to be signed by Colin Thatcher. The owner of the service station confirmed the purchase by Thatcher of gasoline from J. & M. Shell Service in Caron, Saskatchewan on January 18, 1983. This implied that he was near the location of JoAnn at the time of her death. The second key piece of evidence in the Crowns case was Thatchers former girlfriend Lynn Mendell’s testimony.
JoAnn had been shot a year before the attack that ended her life. In this attack she was shot in the shoulder. No person was arrested for this crime. However, Lynne Mendell’s testimony brought an explanation to the table. Mendell told the Court that when Thatcher came down to Palm Springs a few days after his wife had been shot, he told her he’d rented a car; that he, Thatcher, wore a disguise in order to disguise him and his credentials while attempting to murder his wife. According to Ms. Mendell, he told her: “Gee, I didn't gauge the thickness of the glass so the bullet obviously deflected because I only got her in the shoulder.” She also stated that Thatcher told her he left Regina and ran into roadblocks, he then abandoned the gun, the wig, and the overalls in a field and made his way back to Moose Jaw. This testimony confirms Thatcher made previous attempts on his ex wife’s life, therefore there was a pattern, a motive, and invulnerability because of his previous attempt on her life with no
repercussions.
On June 19th of 1990, Robert Baltovich’s girlfriend Elizabeth Bain went missing. Elizabeth told her family that she was going to check the tennis schedules at her school, the University of Toronto Scarborough Campus. She never returned, but her car was eventually recovered. It was found with blood on the backseat, with forensic tests showing that it was Elizabeth’s. With no clear evidence, the “solving” of the case was completely based on eyewitness testimonies, which eventually had Robert arrested for the murder of his girlfriend.
When conducting research for my project, I came across a website that contained a few primary sources regarding the Salem Witch Trials. One of these primary sources was the photo of a legal document explaining the death warrant and reasons for execution of a woman named Bridget Bishop. Bishop was claimed to be a witch in Salem during the year 1692, and the document explaining her significance involving witchcraft resides in the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachusetts. My thesis for this primary source is that the judge and jury believed they were seeking justice by executing Bishop, a woman whose death was truthfully based on her differences as a person rather than actual crimes she committed.
Pauley Perrette barely escaped with her life after a brutal attack from a psychotic homeless man who police believe to be David Merck. Radar Online, Nov. 19, 2015 reports that David was arrested about an hour later, but denies doing anything to Pauley. Melissa Merck believes her cousin David is innocent, because the scenario does not fit him at all.
Is Steve Harmon innocent or guilty you decide. Steve Harmon is put on trial of the murder of Mr. Nesbitt and the robbery of his drug store. During the trail Steve Harmon is seen as guilty by the prosecutor Sandra Petrocelli. The witness Allen Forbes testimony proves that the gun used in the murder was registered under Mr. Nesbitt. This helps prove that the gun was used in the murder and the robbery and the gun was later found in the store. This witness helped me prove that Steve Harmon could have used the gun to kill Mr. Nesbitt or had taken part in the robbery at some point in the crime. “I went around behind the counter and I saw Mr. Nesbitt on the floor—there was blood everywhere and the cash register was open. A lot of cigarettes were
In Tim Seibles' poem, The Case, he reviews the problematic situations of how white people are naturally born with an unfair privilege. Throughout the poem, he goes into detail about how colored people become uncomfortable when they realize that their skin color is different. Not only does it affect them in an everyday aspect, but also in emotional ways as well. He starts off with stating how white people are beautiful and continues on with how people enjoy their presence. Then he transitions into how people of color actually feel when they encounter a white person. After, he ends with the accusation of the white people in today's world that are still racist and hateful towards people of color.
To conclude, despite all the possibilities and other theories of Mrs. Maloney committing the crime out of anger or severe frustration towards Mr. Maloney, there is no credible way to prove it. Mrs. Maloney simply killed her husband as a result of mental anguish, self defense and trauma inflicted upon her. Mrs. Maloney did not plan to kill her husband. She was simply a victim of her situation and could not control her actions. Mrs. Maloney should not be spending time in jail, but safe at home grieving the loss of her husband.
On June 9, 1959, 12-year-old Lynne Harper was raped and murder, her remains found two days later, near Clinton, Ontario. 8 In September 1959, Steven Truscott was convicted for all crimes committed against Harper. Truscott was only 14 at the time and was initially supposed to be a death row inmate, with the sentence later reduced to life in prison. This is important, because 48 years later in 2007, he was exonerated of all charges. This case shed light on the problems of the criminal justice system, as the conviction of Steven Truscott was a miscarriage of justice brought upon by police tunnel vision and suppression of evidence.
The media has taken the Hannah Graham case by storm - it has gotten local, national, and even international coverage. For the past month, I have seen a new article about the case almost everyday. I watched it slowly go from local newspapers in Charlottesville that had been posted by friends who go to UVA who were hoping people would know of her whereabouts, to articles in CNN talking about how Jesse Matthew (the suspect) is a serial rapist and murderer. The case presents itself as a very intriguing case - completely Law and Order SVU worthy with all the twists and turns. However, with all of this public interest in the case, some news outlets are sensationalizing information or even reporting false facts in order to seem as if they have the
trial of two men for the 1971 murder of Helen Betty Osborne in The Pas Manitoba.
Harold Henthorn claims that his second wife Toni Henthorn fell off of a cliff in Colorado when she was taking a picture of them on their 12th wedding anniversary. However a jury in Colorado felt that the claim wasn’t true, and found Harold guilty of first-degree murder. The prosecutors of the case, accused Harold of pushing Toni off of a cliff in Rocky Mountain National Park. They believe the reason he pushed his wife off of the cliff was so that he could get millions of dollars in insurance money. The authorities stated that they are re-opening the case of Harold’s first wife’s death in 1995. However, Harold claims that his first wife Sandra Henthorn died when she was changing the tire on the car, the car fell on her. Henthorn’s conviction
Leadership, the ability to influence a group toward achievement of a vision or set of goals (Kursh, Lant, Majeske, Olver, Plant 232), embodies the theme of the Aston – Blair Case, and it reinforces the importance of good leadership involving teams compiled to achieve specific results. Leadership is an important element in business, and good leadership fosters productive relationships; establishes clear lines of effort, roles, and communication; and inspires individuals to perform despite conflict or personal biases. Bacon’s inexperience and limited management background displays an inability to communicate effectively, and effective communication is an essential element of leadership and group work of this type. As the group chairman, Bacon’s
One of three women, whose cases the documentary-markers followed for a year, from the moment emergency phone calls were placed was Sabrina. The second was Helen, who met Lawrence 10 years ago. For a brief period of time he was nice to her and her son, however when her son turned 12, he was having to run for help to stop Lawrence’s beatings. In between those years, there were assaults, promises to change, letters begging forgiveness. Police photographs show the imprint of his shoe on her face. Jemma was punched, dragged and strangled to unconsciousness by Dwayne, who would wait for her to come around each time before he started
Lieutenant Abraham was the lead investigator on the case of Joan’s death. Abraham was in his early sixties, he was tall and well built. As Abraham was the leader of the case, he also was the first police officer to interview Gordon. Abraham is concerned and worries a lot about Gordon. Abraham has though the whole case supported Gordon and making sure that he was holding up (ll. 11-26, p. 180). Abraham being ready to help Gordon then he stumble after the execution, supports this assertion (ll. 28-30, p. 196).
Duggan, Joe. "The search for Helen Wilson's killer continues." Beatrice Daily Sun 17 Oct. 2008: n. pag. Beatrice Daily Sun. Web. 1 Apr. 2011.
The test that was applied to Harper and Row was the Four Factor test to determine, if indeed it was was fair use. The first being the purpose or character of the use, in this case The Nation violated the copyright holder's commercially valuable right of first publication. Therefore The Nations intent was to benefit off the copyright holder's work first which was not a fair use. Secondly the nature of the copyrighted work, although in most cases this rule favors fair use, the work used had a substantial expressive value, if The Nation had only reported the facts in the work, they would have been in favor of fair use. The third rule applied was the amount and substantiality, in this case even with The Nation only taking a small amount it was constituted a substantial amount because the excerpt they took was the “heart of the work”. Lastly the rule applied here was the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. In other words because The Nation infringed on the original work it led to actual harm, Time Magazine who had the contract with Harper & Row canceled their publishing contract.