Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Study on jury bias
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Study on jury bias
Harold Henthorn claims that his second wife Toni Henthorn fell off of a cliff in Colorado when she was taking a picture of them on their 12th wedding anniversary. However a jury in Colorado felt that the claim wasn’t true, and found Harold guilty of first-degree murder. The prosecutors of the case, accused Harold of pushing Toni off of a cliff in Rocky Mountain National Park. They believe the reason he pushed his wife off of the cliff was so that he could get millions of dollars in insurance money. The authorities stated that they are re-opening the case of Harold’s first wife’s death in 1995. However, Harold claims that his first wife Sandra Henthorn died when she was changing the tire on the car, the car fell on her. Henthorn’s conviction
is a mandatory life sentence, starting on December 8th this year. Toni’s brother, Todd Bertolet, said that, “the family immediately grew suspicious about her death because Harold kept changing his story about what had happened.” Todd also said that they didn’t learn anything until after his sister had died, about Harold’s first wife’s death.
Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits anyone knowingly or willfully offering, paying or soliciting or receiving remuneration, directly or indirectly; in cash or kind; in exchange for; patient referrals or furnishing or arranging a good or service for a Federal healthcare program including Medicare or Medicaid. Stark would also apply to Hanlester as well but Stark was not enacted until after the Hanlester case. Stark is strict liability, does not require the knowingly/willfully element, and is not prosecuted criminally.
Dan was involved in the Cement truck incident where 5 family members were killed. In 2007 a cement truck driven by an erratic enraged driver rolled over a vehicle stationary at a red light instantly crushing and killing all the occupants of the vehicle including 3 young children aged 16 months, 6 and 9 years old. After the
It started as any ordinary day at Fowler Middle School, kids laughing and learning. But, at 8:51 AM, a classroom of students walked into a horrifying scene. Marilyn Tokzulott’s second-period class found their teacher dead on the floor behind her desk, murdered. Despite the many suspects, one stands out above all. Billy Plummer, the boyfriend of the victim's daughter, committed this murder. It is clear that the murderer was Mr.Plummer because of involvement in previous conflicts with Mrs. Tokzullot, presence at the crime scene and access to the murder weapon.
Tyrone Fleming, an actor in the YouTube crime show "848", was found stabbed to death in his Bronx apartment on University Avenue around 5:30 p.m. Wednesday.
Jonbenet Ramsey was murdered on December 26, 1996. Her body was found in the basement of the Ramsey's house. When the autopsy of her body was made they found some interesting details. The police suspected she died of suffocation but later they find that she was already dead when the rope when around her neck. A blunt hard object struck her head which cause her to be brain dead. This could have been something similar to a flashlight they found at the scene. The autopsy also showed that Jonbenet ate a piece of pineapple before she died. There were two small marks on her back as well. The Ramsey didn't want her body to be examined or look in there house for more evidence. They didn't really cooperate with the police to help
At the time of the murder of which David Milgaard was accused of committing he was just 16 years old. He was a hippie, constantly in trouble. Even before he was a teenager he was getting into trouble. His parents and teachers considered him impulsive; he resisted authority (Regina Leader Post, 1992, as cited in Anderson & Anderson 1998). He was removed from kindergarten because he was considered to be a negative influence on the other children. When he was thirteen he spent time in a psychiatric centre (Anderson & Anderson, 1998)
While reading the case about Mr.Hossack 's murder i saw the wife, Mrs.Hossack, as innocent at first. The children all claimed that the two did not argue for over a year, so why would she kill him now verses a year ago? When the youngest child, Ivan Hossack, came to the stand and "told his story in a straight, unhesitating manner" it made it easier for me to believe in Mrs. Hossack 's innocence. The child even said that he saw his mother aiding his father when he called out for help. If she had been the one to swing the axe, why would she help him and risk getting in trouble? Most importantly, if he was conscious and talking, why wouldn 't he say who to murderer was? He could have easily identified his wife in the dark after being married for over twenty years, and yet he didn 't identify who had tried to kill him. Dr. Dean first stated that the axe did not hit the speech portion of the brain, so he could have been conscious and yelling out for his wife. Dean later stated that the fatal blow from the axe would have left Mr.Hossack unconscious. The murder weapon had blood on in and apparent hairs stuck to one side; "Prof. John L. Tilton of Simpson college... was unable to say definitely that the hair had been
Killer Kovat court, on Sunday a student was charged with terrorist threats and acts. I am defending Emily Kikari Sakamoto 21 whom a Emory University student posted on social media that “I'm shooting up the school,” police and university officials said Monday. She was held on $1500 bond in the Newton County Jail. She could face 1-5 years in prison if she's convicted of the single act of plotting terroristic threats, a felony. In an arrest report, Emory police said Sakamoto used YikYak and posted anonymously “ I'm shooting up the school tomorrow. Stay in your rooms. The ones on quad are who will go first. “ The post was live for a few minutes until Emory students took screenshots of it and provided it to the police and she was arrested later on in the afternoon that day.
“My job as a prosecutor is to do justice. And justice is served when a guilty man is convicted and an innocent man is not.” This quote is from Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. She is well known for extremely controversial court decisions in court cases, much like the controversy surrounding the Steven Avery murder trial. In 2005, Steven Avery was accused and charged with the murder of Teresa Halbach when Halbach was on Avery’s property to take pictures of his vehicle for Autotrader. This murder was just like any other murder, other than the fact that many believe he is innocent. This belief of innocence is sparked by “Making a Murderer,” a television series that brought public attention to the involvement of the Manitowoc County Police
There are mixed opinions about this question, and many people have wondered about how Teresa Halbach was actually murdered. Steven Avery (Brendan Dassey’s uncle) and Brendan were convicted for Teresa Halbach’s murder in 2005, and both were sentenced to life in prison. In 2017, a federal judge in Wisconsin revoked the murder and sexual assault convictions of Brendan Dassey, and he was ordered a release from prison. Today, Brendan awaits the court’s decision on his freedom. I believe Brendan Dassey should remain in prison because he is responsible for Teresa Halbach’s murder.
This was the last time anyone reportedly saw Thatcher’s ex-wife alive. Less than an hour later a passerby discovered her beaten body lying in a pool of blood inside her own garage. She had been bludgeoned and shot in her Regina home. Speculation arose that Thatcher was in some way involved, though he was not formally charged until May 7, 1984. Colin Thatcher was charged on the grounds that he unlawfully caused the death of JoAnn Wilson contrary to s. 218 of the Criminal Code . Section 218(1) of the Code provides that,“every one who commits first degree murder or second degree murder is guilty of an indictable offence and shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life.” Section 214 classifies murder into two types: first degree murder and second degree murder. First degree murder is described as an intentional killing that is planned and deliberate. Second degree murder is described as an intentional killing that is not premeditated or planned, nor committed in a reasonable "heat of
JonBenét Ramsey's murder has been a mystery that has captivated and intrigued the nation for over two decades. One morning, Mother, Patsy Ramsey found a detailed, handwritten, note which demanded $118,000 and also allegedly said to have kidnapped JonBenét (Casarez). Later, six year old JonBenét was found dead in her Boulder, Colorado home
Edward Gein was born on August 27, 1906 in La Crosse county, Wisconsin. His parents were George Philip and Augusta Wilhelmine Gein, his sibling was Henry George Gein.Edward Gein’s father was an alcoholic, and his mother was very religious. The death of his mother is the cause of Ed Gein’s murder.
Though there are some aspects to Adnan Syed that point to him being the murderer of Hae Min Lee, an immense amount of verification supports his innocence and refutes the evidence held against him, showing that he is innocent. There were many points to the story of the murder that showed Adnan to be guilty, but through Jay’s inconsistent story, the incorrect and impossible timeline and the alibis, Adnan’s innocence shines through. Jay’s story was very detailed and he did have a lot of evidence that suggest Adnan is guilty. He could prove a lot of things and had an overall long and vivid explanation of the whole day. However, he became more and more unreliable when he changed his story multiple times and switched up his facts. Also, he mixes
A case in which brought a huge amount of attention to capital punishment is the Roper v. Simmons case (Reuters, 2017). The Roper v. Simmons case included a teen named, Christopher Simmons, Simmons planned and committed a murder at the age of seventeen. He was convicted and sentenced the death penalty at the age of eighteen. Simmons petitioned after his conviction that he was under the age of eighteen at the time of the crime, therefore he was still a juvenile. He related back to the Atkins v Virginia case indicating he was under eighteen and not fully mentally developed yet. In the Atkins case the sentence was violating the eighth amendment valid to the states done by the fourteenth amendment, which states the prohibition of a mentally retarded