Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Apple business model and position
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Apple after the death of Steve Jobs Steve Jobs stepped down as the CEO of the company on August 24,2011. He gave Apple a series of successful products like ipod, iphone and ipad. But speculations rose as whether the company will continue to grow at the same pace when Tim Cook joined it. Some said that Apple is losing on innovation on new products or strategies while others criticized Cook on his way of working in the company. But, recent financial statements prove all of them wrong. Apple became the most profitable company in history last week. According to a report by guardian.com the tech giant made $18 billion in just three months by selling 34000 iphones from October to December. Apple now has $178 billion cash in the bank which gives …show more content…
It has boosted EPS for the company and at the same time given investors a reason to rejoice by giving them dividends. Recent trends According to Forbes.com Apple recorded US$18 billion in profit from this quarter’s sales of US$74.6 billion. A major chunk of this profit came from Apple iphone sales from international markets. It sold 74.5 million iphones and saw a 70% rise in China sales. But how sustainable this growth would be is a question that looms large in front of tech giant like Apple. Though it has tried to innovate its products according to the changing generations but how far can it keep on doing the same. We will further analyze the Smartphone industry by applying porter’s five forces. Industry Rivalry:High There are a large number of competitors present in Smartphone industry serving to lower income group to niche segment consumers. Life of a product in this industry has reduced to a large extent relying largely on R&D to match with the emerging trends. The price of a Smartphone is decreasing whereas the purchasing power of buyer is increasing. There is also huge competition between Ios, Windows, and Android at the OS …show more content…
to Apple Inc. in 2007. The company which had pc driving its growth over the years transformed into more of a Smartphone company. Mac pc was impressive in terms of hardware but it was Windows operating system which gave it a tough competition. To achieve a sustainable growth Apple should be focused more towards development of its operating system. Android is the main competitor for iOS. Android which is Linux based and partly open source, is more PC like than IOS. Android is easily customizable as compared to apple IOS. Apple should work aggressively towards working of development of more number of apps with the developers across the industry so as to increase the reach of IOS and making it a more preferable choice among its
Apple Computer Inc designs, manufactures, and markets personal computers and related personal computing and communication solutions. The return of Steve Jobs, the companies founder, as CEO has pulled the company’s stock price up 775-percent through his launch of innovative products such as the iMac computer line. On January 5, 2000, Jobs announced that he was dropping interim from his CEO title and taking the job full-time. With this news and Apple’s new products such as the iBook, a portable pc and Quick TV, an internet television access feature, Apple Computer is headed for success and is sure to increase their share in the computer market.
The cell phone market has grown in the past few years, many firms have entered and exited the market. Once a highly competitive market is now condensed to four main telecommunication
In this following report I will discuss the phone industry and analysed it in great detail. I will analysis the market structure and try and understand why the mobile industry falls to heavily oligopoly structure. I will highlight all the structures, however I will discuss in detail how, for example Vodafone can be incorporated in the porter’s five forces method to show how the mobile industry has devolved over the years and to understand if consumers are driven by the actual technology of the phone but if it driven more by style.
Technology has become a huge part of everyday life, and people seem to have one great debate and are fighting over which is the best phone, iPhone or Android. The Apple iPhone is a cellular smartphone that was created and is maintained by Apple Inc. Android is another type of smartphone that is accessible to consumers, but the operating system is powered by Google and many different companies produce Android devices. The different operating systems and interfaces have created a long and carried out debate to which was superior. iPhone is the better phone and there are many reasons as to why it is superior to its rival, Android. The iPhone’s sleek and beautiful design has users’ hands fondling the device and never putting it down. The operating system is very distinct, but is straightforward with its functionality. People who purchase the iPhone believe that they have received their money’s worth and more when owning and iPhone. The iPhone is better than Android when compared because of the beautiful design and attractive display, the operating system and its functionality, and the device’s personal worth is definitely worth the money spent to own one.
While profits from semiconductor sales are keeping stakeholders happy, Samsung is pursuing a differentiation strategy in the smartphone market. The managers are committing more resources to researching something they think will revolutionize phones. author name writes, “All smartphone makers face the issue of stagnancy in hardware innovation. Samsung is currently working on developing a smartphone with foldable displays…” (Tanner). There has not been a ground-breaking development in smart phones in the last few years, so the managers believe
With the development of technology, smartphones seem to be deeply occupying our life. When it comes to smartphones, the first two brands that come into our mind would be Apple and Samsung. These two technology companies are the most popular and excellent in the world. Every year when they are going to release new products, without any controversy, their products will draw people’s attention a lot. In fact, the competition between Apple and Samsung has been ongoing for a long time. Different people have their own biased to choose their phones, as some people may prefer iPhone series; instead, other people may favor Samsung more. Each of them has their own merits to attract the public to buy them. I use a picture as my text to illustrate the
It is 2013 and the smartphone industry shows high profit potential when considering the Five Competitive Forces. While there are many firms in the market, Samsung and Apple are the two largest accounting for nearly half of the smartphones shipped worldwide. Samsung and Apple continue to offer differentiated products while their incumbents produce relatively inexpensive standard goods.
Besides, due to the life cycles of the gadgets and innovations are very short and people are always demand for higher and better technology, to remain as a leader in the industry, Apple Inc. must provide the latest innovations
Apple Inc. was established by Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak on April 1, 1976 as a computer designer, developer and seller company. However, the company shifted its focus from only personal computer to include other consumer electronics such as portable media player and mobile phone in 2007. Apple Inc becomes one of the most popular makers in its field since it seems that its popularity has increased according to a report on www.statista.com that Apple Inc’s products sales was generally increasing throughout the first quarter of 2006 to the first quarter of 2014. On the one hand, it has increased its revenue from about 14 billion US dollars to more than 170 billion US dollars in 2013. All in all, the company is highly successful corresponding to its products’ development and their sales growth in world’s market.
The smartphone industry is characterised by high competition especially amongst manufacturers with Samsung (30%) and Apple (13%) dominating the market (Gartner). It recently experienced a disruptive shift with the success of Google's Open Source Operating Software (OS), Android, which many manufacturers now use rather than their own proprietary OS. Thus XYZ must not only compete with manufacturing titans but also find innovative solutions to develop software able to compete with Android and iOS.
Samsung, Apple and LG have captured more than 87% of the market. This high concentration makes the industry less competitive. Moreover, from 2104 to 2015, the population of Canadians owned a smartphone has increased by about 24% (Catalyst, 2016). As shown in Passport, firms simply expand their market rather than take each other’s market share. Innovation and new technology are the essential parts for the differentiation of the company to gain market share and profits in Canada’s smartphone industry.
In recent years it seems that Apple and Samsung are taking over the mobile phone industry and are becoming the new leaders in sales and innovation. Its goodbye to Nokia and Blackberry and is a time where phones are much more than just communication devices, but is a representation of people’s lives. Additionally with the continuing demand that users are expecting of phones, those companies who cannot keep up are left behind. Apple and Samsung are the two companies who are who have been able to keep up with those demands and have changed their marketing strategies and campaigns in order to appeal to the consumers.
Under the circumstance that the mobile phone industry entered the 3rd generation, Nokia faced competition from both macro level and industry level. For the macro level, the government encouraged competition among the operators and handset manufacturers by giving digital licenses to new entrants. As a result, the mobile phones became more sophisticated, for example, the cameras and the games in the mobile phone. For the industry level, which can be analyzed by the Porter’s Five Forces, (lecture )Nokia was facing threat of new entrants, competitive rivalry and the bargaining power of buyers is increasing as well. As the government encourage completion between the handset manufacturers, there are several new entrants from different countries enter this industry, such as Apple from USA, Samsung from Korea. These new entrants compete with Nokia in both smartphone segment and basic phone segment. Some of them even constructed “ecosystems”, which they could integrate the services and applications quickly, in order to produce the phone in just two days. For the bargaining power of buyers’ aspect, they do not need to rely on the only operating system Symbian. They can choose Windows mobile launched by Microsoft, Android launched by Google and Ios launched by Apple, in addition, basically all of them are better than Symbian (Amiya, 2010). The buyers could choose any
With the revolution of modern technologies especially in smartphone these days changes the growth in communication devices market. The levels of competitions are rising up both locally and internationally. This competition affects not only in innovation and production, but also in marketing and the demographic markets. Not only U.S, but other countries such as Korea and China are opening up and growing in economy, making them some of the most active in smartphone market.
Samsung and Apple hold the top two spots in the smartphone vendor market worldwide largely due to their flagship phones both paired with the most powerful, yet user friendly mobile operating systems available (Jones, 2016). Samsung released its first Android smartphone in June 2009, however, it was not until the release of the Samsung Galaxy S a year later, that Samsung smartphones could compare to the iPhone. In fact the design of the phones and other Samsung devices were similar enough to spark a patent battle lasting from 2010 to 2015 between the two companies. Not only did this battle create more competition between the companies, it also fueled the competition between consumers.