Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction on educational leadership
Leadership Style
Leadership Style
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction on educational leadership
Captain Picard played by Patrick Stewart on the Science fiction TV show “Star trek, The Next Generation” which ran from about 1987-1993 is a leader I’ve selected as someone I admired and admire. His style of leadership that he routinely employed resembled contingency theory in that there really isn’t any precise single way of leading. Leadership styles can play off of certain situations. In the show the Captain always performed at the maximum level but also showed vulnerability in other scenarios which kept his larger than life persona in check. Captain Picard demonstrated a contingency leadership theory style because leadership often mirrors traits men possess within themselves and externalize or manifest to situations and how they exercise …show more content…
He was a teacher and encouraged others to improve. He would admit and grow from mistakes, he was consistent and took the initiative. He was always a good listener and delegated responsibility when it called for it expertly and he engaged his confrontations, met them head on and without fear. Captain Picard also had great charisma, a presence and an aura which many leaders simply do not possess which commanded respect, his orders were never questioned and his followers had great respect and admiration for his position.
My own leadership style is one I like to think of as laisse-faire versus micro managing in style, I prefer to size up subordinates and ascertain their abilities and capabilities and if they are sufficiently mature and capable, I allow them to run with their tasks as self-governing until such time as they give me a reason to pause and reconsider my position. I’ve been given constructive criticism by my mentor that I have room to improve with my assertiveness and I do plan
…show more content…
My mentor approves of my leadership role model and is familiar with the TV series and believes the areas I need to work on were areas Captain Picard handled masterfully.
Sometimes to get noticed one must take risks, try and stand out and get noticed in a good way. It’s true that playing it safe through life is what most folks do, to truly be great at anything means you have to be ready to sacrifice more than what the other average person is expected to do. It’s true that every great leader didn’t get to their pinnacle by doing average work or playing it safe. Developing one’s own brand or style that works well can be measured in how others are willing to take your direction and orders and doing that well is definitely something that takes experience and practice.
In
A leader must always lead by example, be self-accountable for his/her professional and personal behavior. Have moral and mental strength to do what is right, with confidence and resolution, even in the face of temptation or adversity. A leader must be committed to its SAILORS, so that its SAILORS will be committed to him/her. In today’s Navy, we must be leaders in
It takes a long time to become an effective and respected leader but can evaporate very quickly with one misstep. It needs to be nurtured and cultivated every day. My personal leadership style is to observe and correct. As a junior member, one of my Chief told me, “I don’t care how long it takes you to do a job as long as you do it right the first time because if it is wrong you will be the one fixing it.” That resonated with me because it allowed me to take risks and learn from my mistakes making me a better technician. I firmly believe one of the best learning tools is failure. His statement let me know it was all right to fail but if you do you will be learning from it. Identifying weaknesses within my leadership abilities and striving to correct them will result in being consistently looked upon a leader within our
In Star Trek the Next Generation : "The Defector," does Captain Picard prove himself to be a good leader? In trying to answer this question, I thought "Well, what makes a good leader? Who do we (the general public) consider to be good leaders?" The most obvious choices popped into my head: President of the United States, Congress Representatives, CEO's of large companies. But after considering these leaders, I did not see how Picard compared to them. After all, he is the Captain of the Enterprise, a military space ship. I guess that makes him more of a Colin Powell type-a U.S. military officer of the highest ranking. It makes sense that U.S. military officers are considered to be good leaders. But, does Picard (as a military officer himself) measure up to the standards of a U.S. military officer?
There are several different items that I have stored in my leadership “bag of tricks”. The one that I find myself applying the most is the ability to be both stern but flexible. I am a true believer in the statement that no one is perfect. As a leader I feel tha...
Kouzes and Posner remark that leadership experiences are ?voyages of discovery and adventures of a lifetime?[and] they are challenging explorations under rigorous conditions? (174). While this may be true, it is often in an extreme crisis situation that leadership is ultimately tested. This is the circumstance that Shackleton faced with his crew of twenty-seven, while stranded in the ice floes off the Antarctic Continent. Credit is due to the leadership of Ernest Shackleton; every member aboard the Endurance survived, and was finally rescued after six hundred and thirty-four days. Shackleton said of leadership, ?If you?re a leader, a fellow that other fellows look to, you?ve got to keep going? (qtd. in Morrell and Capparell 215).
Captain Picard is a good leader because of his ability to think clearly and objectively in all situations. He does not have pride blocking his ability to think rationally and see all sides of an issue. Also, he is not easily swayed by his emotions and does not allow them to cloud his judgment. Picard's ability to act quickly leads to effective delegating and exemplary leadership.
You can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make him drink is a proverb I have heard since I was young. Leadership is the skill of influencing people to accomplish goals (Huber, 2014). In today’s world with policy and technological changes the leaders must use their leadership skills to not only get the horse to the water, have him drink, but also do it with a smile an invite others to join him. Leaders use a variety of styles to accomplish their goals. I will discuss the leadership style that I utilize most often, how my style relates to leadership theories and the work type environment it is most useful in.
Reflecting on my skills inventory questionnaire, I have determined my technique skill is my strongest area of expertise. I believe these results are accurate because I have always taken pride in my self-sufficiency. I take great measures to have the tools and knowledge to successful complete my tasks. When working in my professional and academic life I am very task oriented. For example, when I was a manager at a Tim Horton’s, I always made sure my followers were working towards the objective of providing fast, quality service. I did not care much for my human interactions or conceptual knowledge of the job. I find my leadership style is quite rigid. I believe the duty of a leader is to accomplish a mutual
I have had the opportunity to work with leaders of different styles, and by just watching them, listening to them and seeing how the staff reacts; I can gauge what is productive with their staff. I try not to copy or mimic their style and ensure my own style comes through in being consistent, authentic and genuine. I feel by following these traits they give me necessary foundation and help me towards achieving leadership excellence.
Leadership has been described as a “complex process having multiple dimensions” (Northouse, 2013). Over the past 60 years, scholars and practitioners have introduced a vast amount of leadership models and theories to explain this complex field and examine its many perspectives. Numerous leadership theories and models have attempted to define what makes a leader effective. From the early 1900s, the trait paradigm dominated leadership literature, focusing on inherited traits of leaders and suggesting that “leaders are born, not made”. However, during the 1950s, the trait approach lost enthusiasm as focus shifted to the behavior of leaders. Similar to the trait theory, the behavioral paradigm was based on general effective leadership behaviors
There is a time and place to insert these styles and depending on the people being lead will help key into what style needs to be brought to light. Being a leader seems to be both engrained in us genetically and life lessons mold into our leadership style as we progress through life. The balance of rewards and punishments were carefully applied, but he ensured to continue maximizing great experiences since human nature tends to want to be surrounded by it. My stepfather gave us his selfless service and seeks no recognition for what he did; he was worthy of it.
Each style being a reflection of the leader’s emotional intelligence. Goleman (2009) refers to emotional intelligence as “the capacity for recognizing our own feelings and those of others, for motivating ourselves, and for managing emotions in ourselves and in our relationships”. Therefore, one can see the importance of self-awareness and recognizing your own feelings and actions and how they those you are leading. The first leadership style, commanding, is often associated with leaders that have a strong desire to win, high initiative, and a high level of self-control. While there are aspiring emotional intelligence competencies associated with the commanding leadership style, is also has the largest negative impact on the climate of your working environment if utilized inappropriately. It is a “Do as I say and not as I do” authoritarian style that may work in an immediate crisis or with problematic employees, but should not be used on a consistent basis with all employees. A leader that demands immediate compliance has a tendency to promote negativity, hostility, and creates an atmosphere that is not conducive to morale or efficient