Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Government funding of public education
Government funding of public education
Government funding of public education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Government funding of public education
Corporate GRPS is a public school district, therefore considered a non-profit organization. The majority of the funds that enter the district are allocated by the local, state and federal funds. Essentially, the funds come from the amount of student’s school district serves. There is a set amount of money funded per student. This covers the immense costs of teacher salaries, administration salaries, custodial staff, transportation, facility use, technology, educational materials, etc. Within the Athletics department, there is a separation of Board of Education funds (BOE) and Grant funds. The grant is funded via the Student Advancement Foundation, specifically the grant is called GR8 Sports, Great Kids. It is privately funded by donors like Doug and Maria DeVos. The annual grant has allowed us to expand athletics programming across the district, offering 14 sports to 22 schools involving students’ grades 6-8. The corporate social responsibility of the middle school athletics program is to offer quality programming to student …show more content…
Public schools are not in the business of making money. Their primary goal is to utilize the resources they are given efficiently, accounting for dollar spent. GRPS middle school athletics projects all of their expense in a worst case scenario. This allows the middle school athletics to properly forecast the budget just in case something goes wrong. The biggest expense for any organization is the cost of its employees. Employees include: Athletic Directors (management), coaches, officials, and game help. The second biggest cost is transporting teams to competition site locations. Properly utilizing donor funds has allowed the MS Athletics department to stretch grant dollars beyond the original date range. It has also instilled a sense of security within the donors, knowing that their money is not being
Early Grants and Allocations –a supplemental tax was given to schools to enhance school programs.
Within a community is a sense of unity, which for many is brought together by the young athletes of the community. In his article “High School Sports Have Turned Into Big Business,” Mark Koba of CNBC highlights that within the last thirty to forty years high school football has escalated into a highly revered tradition in which not only communities, but highly successful corporations have begun to dedicate millions of dollars towards (Koba n. pg.). This highlights the status of sports within the community and may explain part of the reason schools would favor sports over other programs. Because sports programs can often turn over big profits for schools, they tend to dedicate most of their excess funds towards sports, and rely on sports programs to create large profits for the school. When school administrators see how much sports unite, excite, and benefit the school, they develop a respect for sports and consider it a necessity to provide a good sports program for their students and community. Also in his article, Koba quotes an interviewee named Mark Conrad who is the associate professor of legal and ethical studies at Fordham University 's school of...
Where is the money these athletic programs are earning going? There are many different categories in which a college program needs to put their money in order to create the best profit they can for the next
These small, mostly private schools are spending millions on Football fields, Gyms, indoor and outdoor tracks and student recreation centers. This battle seems almost unnecessary considering almost zero of these athletes will become professionals and in most cases athletics takes away around 20-25 hours of school work time to there student athletes. Looking at the research there seems to be three reasons why schools sell the idea of how a new facility can bring more then a large bill to the school. These points are first recruiting success that leads to athletic success and the enrollment bump in not only the student athletes but also the student population as a whole. Finally how the sch...
Funding for high school athletics is very sparse compared to the actual costs to run a promising team. With the most recent recession, travel/showcase teams taking over parent’s wallets, and misunderstanding of the Title IV amendment, funding for high school athletic teams has been dwindling in the past twenty years. Consolidation, taxing, and a well-orchestrated plans are all promising solutions to provide for high school athletics. Athletic facility fundraising groups are turning out to be the most resourceful and efficient source for raising the needed money. Fundraising is a prominent solution; however, the will and want of individual sports teams to improve their status is the ultimate way to get what each specific team needs.
The payment of NCAA student-athletes will deteriorate the value of an education to the athletes. The value of an education for a young man or woman cannot be measured. It is our gate way to success as...
Financial aspects and profitability of college athletic programs is one of the most important arguments involved in this controversy. A group of people expresses that college athletic programs are over emphasized. The point they show on the first hand, is that athletic programs are too expensive for community colleges and small universities. Besides, statistics prove that financial aspects of college athletic programs are extremely questionable. It is true that maintenance, and facility costs for athletic programs are significantly high in comparison to academic programs. Therefore, Denhart, Villwock, and Vedder argue that athletic programs drag money away from important academics programs and degrade their quality. According to them, median expenditures per athlete in Football Bowl Subdivision were $65,800 in 2006. And it has shown a 15.6 percent median expenditure increase fro...
With society’s ever increasing price tag of education, public schools have gone to great lengths to cut costs from the unessential activities during and after school hours. First it was music programs and art classes; however, with the desperate need for teachers, athletic programs have felt the grunt of this expedition. Now, more than ever, youths in our communities are battling serious problems. Not only are sports and organized athletic programs vital to physical development, but also mental growth and offer children structure and goals. Unfortunately, many schools have to cut back or even eliminate sports/athletic programs due to lack of funding.
When schools make budget cuts, they usually take money from athletic programs and clubs. The author is essentially saying that schools have taken away funding from too many programs that it feels as if they will will even stop funding necessary programs in order to say money. This critique on budget cuts helps us see the problem within the public school system. Certain activities that are common in other schools will be seen as a luxury to students in other schools and therefor are not given the same opportunities. The underfunded schools have taken away money from many programs that they will now have to stop funding certain areas that are key to a student’s education.
Voltmer and Esslinger assert that financial management of an athletic department is one of the most important duties of the physical education administrator. The physical education administrator is responsible for making all decisions dealing with budget, income, expenditures and accounting aspects for all levels of the athletic department (interschool and interscholastic). Efficient financial management is important in any field; however, when dealing with public funds, no teacher or administrator can afford to be careless or ignorant (Voltmer & Esslinger, 1967). Therefore, physical administrators must employ simple and effective procedures when addressing the financial management of the athletic program.
Explain the connection between the economic model of corporate social responsibility and “free market” or “neoclassical” economic theory.
meet the school guidelines. All schools have a certain amount they can spend because of
Sports can help many at- risk youths. In order to participate in sports you need to be committed and willing to work hard. You also have to learn to respect others and accept that winning isn’t the only measure of success. Losing can build character as well. When youth participate in a sports they enjoy, they are less likely to engage in behaviors that are harmful or dangerous to themselves and others. It is for these reasons schools should strive to maintain athletic programs for their students.
With more funds, schools could accomodate more student participation in such events, and these events can ve very beneficial. Sports and other "extracurriculars" like Science Olympiad help develop students both physically and mentally, and the introduction of more money for the school would improve the quality of these programs. By allowing students to participate in more and new experiences, corporate sponsorships help students develop and increase the value of their high school educations. In doing this, the extra funds that come with these corporate agreements shows how much better off the school are compared to how they would be without
Government provide an enormous amount of funding in a school’s budget. Giving enough money for educational supplies in most cases. Without spending any of the government money on athletic supplies. Making it necessary to charge athletes for the sports they participate in. This steady flow of cash keeps these athletic programs running. Benefits include, facility upgrades, new uniforms, and paying coaches. This keeps athletic programs thriving, but denies the government from making cuts to the budget. Athletes and their parents must take a stand by providing some type of funding.