Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Power within an organization
How has mcdonaldization changed our society
The importance of power in an organization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Power within an organization
We live in a world of organizations that make it nearly impossible for us as individuals to live our lives as our own. The purpose of me writing this is to show you how and why.
The organizations that dominate our society are known as formal organizations. Businesses, schools (colleges and universities, corporations, governments, churches and other religious institutions all fall under the category of a formal organization. Basically any institution you come into contact with on a daily basis. The harsh reality is that every person in this world, your friends, family, professors, bosses, especially you are a member of an organization; possibly several. And each of us contributes to the organization in our own way whether we want to or don’t.
…show more content…
Bureaucratic organizations are characterized by division of labor and hierarchy. Division of labor is the certain task that we as individuals hold within the organization. Your position depends on what you’re qualified for. The most skilled people will be placed in positions where they can get the task done in the most efficient way possible. The hierarchy is composed of offices where there are few people at the top controlling the people at the bottom. Your placement within the hierarchy explains how much authority you have in the organization but each office is ruled by another above them except for if you’re at the very bottom and at the very top. So if you’re at the bottom you have little to no authority. The people at the top, or powerful elite create the rules and regulations essential to each position held beneath them so that their goals for the organization are met. And that in itself leaves no room for individuality for the people at the bottom. Your behavior is under control because as a member of the organization you are forced to follow the rules set before you …show more content…
This is where Weber’s Iron Cage comes into play. The Iron Cage is a metaphor for the rules and regulations that imprison us as humans in a society. It basically stops us from being able to act or think as individuals, we’re stuck in our positions within the bureaucratic organization. Essentially every aspect of our life is controlled by bureaucracies. George Ritzer describes a form of this control in what he calls McDonaldization. According to Ritzer, McDonaldization is a process where society is starting to become like a fast-food restaurant in the way that it operates. There are four principles that are associated with McDonaldization: efficiency, calculability, predictability and control (replacing humans with nonhuman
In today’s world, technology and current norms drive a large portion of everyday life that the vocabulary becomes a common universal language. For example, if you don’t know or understand something, just “google” or ask “siri” about it, write a “blog” about a recent experience, or witnessed the latest “post” that has received over 1.6K “likes”. George Ritzer describes the same thing with the fast food restaurant McDonald’s in his video “The McDonaldization of Society”. He defines McDonaldization as the process by which principles of the fast food restaurant have begun to overflow and dominate all aspects of our world.
Etzioni states that when people work at fast food businesses, it sets an nonacademic standard of working conditions. Workers are being taught specific roles in the workplace that are mapped out for them the way it is required to be, which leaves “[...] no room for initiative, creativity, or even elementary rearrangements” (Etzioni). Etzioni shares his idea that fast food industries are training “robots”. These “robots’ follow commands mindlessly, whether it be cutting into homework or family time, dropping out of school, or doing whatever it takes just to keep a job that is supposed to be the initial training ground in work experience.
Bureaucracy is a dominant organization that has emerged in life (Henslin, 2012). It can be a school or university, the government, grocery store, etc. There are five different characteristics in a bureaucracy: clear levels, with assignments flowing downward and accountability flowing upward, a division of labor, written rules, written communications and records, and impersonality and replaceability (Henslin, 2012). A farmer’s market has each of these characteristics. A farmer’s market is a place where farmers or people come and sell healthy, organic foods, or sell different artistic pieces. This essay explains the different characteristics outlined in a farmer’s market.
The Federal Bureaucracy is comprised of nearly every department, committee, and agency that makes up the Federal Government. The function of the bureaucracy is to implement laws and policies, define the rules and regulations of how a law works, and institute examinations, permits and licenses. Congress makes the laws and policies in a broad manner and the bureaucrats flesh out the details and minutia of the intent of that law’s maker. The bureaucrats of the specific department etc. may be appointed officials, civil service employees or other federal employees. The persons are typically specialized in a specific field that relates to the committee’s duties and responsibilities and possess more knowledge than the lawmakers, which allows policies
There are many pathologies present in the American bureaucracy and bureaucratic agencies. The major pathologies are red tape, conflict, duplication, imperialism, and waste. Each of these pathologies had at least some sort of roots in the case of the 9/11/01 terrorist attack. Had these pathologies not been prominent in the pre-9/11 bureaucratic government, it is very likely that our intelligence communities would not have failed to detect the terrorists.
Ritzer’s scholarly work has been heavily influenced by German sociologist Max Weber, who feared that bureaucracy would spread until society became a seamless web of rationalized institutions from which there would be no escape. At the time when Weber wrote, in the early twentieth century, totalitarianism was the biggest threat to individual freedom. In the 1980s, Ritzer thought to apply Weber’s theories about rational systems to a very different threat: the proliferation of fast-food chains.
Bureaucracy has been the main form of organisation for over a century and can be characterised by the following: functional specialisation, employees carrying out one function of activity as their primary role; hierarchy of authority, those in superior positions having authority based solely on the virtue of the position itself; a system of rules, the tasks of the organisation following a formal set of procedures and practices; and impersonality, individuals being treated on the basis of the rules rather than emotions and personality (Knights & Willmott, 2012). The mainstream perspective states that a bureaucratic organisation’s central aim is to maximise efficiency, objectivity and fairness and can be thought of as a ‘machine’ with the people making up the components (Knights & Willmott, 2012). This view attributes three problems to this rule-centred organisation: poor motivation, poor customer service and a resistance to innovation and change (Knights & Willmott, 2012). Employees in bureaucratic organisations tend not to be committed to their
Meyer , J. W. , and Rowan , B. “ Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth
The McDonaldization of Society The McDonaldization of society may sound somewhat misleading but the term actually refers to the rationalization of society. The use of the word "McDonaldization" just simply indicates that the fast food restaurant is one of many great examples of rationality. Ritzer discusses five dimensions that characterize rationality or a rationalized society: efficiency, predictability, calculability, the use and preference of non-human technology, and the control over uncertainty. The five characteristics can be noticed in various aspects of society which exemplifies the extent that rationality affects our society and societies worldwide. In this paper I will summarize Ritzer's discussion of these five characteristics and give possible examples of each dimension.
George Ritzer’s (2004) The McDonaldization of Society gives us a more modern look at the rationalization. The McDonaldization of Society talks about how the principles of fast food restaurants have come to dominate more and more areas of American society. Ritzer outlines five dominant themes. They are efficiency, calculability, predictability, increased control, and the replacement of human by non-human technology. All of these themes contribute to companies making a higher profit often at the expense of the consumer; it is all about the bottom line. After looking at my own life I found some areas that were controlled by rationality. School is one case where the bottom line in the past has been the number one priority. The grade was what I was striving for in the end. While I learned things along the way, my head was always focused on the end reward and the most efficient way to get there.
Similarly in Weber’s bureaucratic approach, organizations are divided into different echelons with each varying in its degrees of influence. Each unit being commanded by the one above it, a system that promotes stability and has a predictable line of communication. Both approaches of management rely heavily on regulated control. Whether governing task scientifically of people authoritatively. A solid form of control is mus...
The specialized officials in leadership positions in a bureaucratic system often assume a coercive role that is disguised in a sacerdotal role. The hidden coerciveness of bureaucracy comes along with diminished employee autonomy, and the consequence of this is the creation of social distance between and among employees and employers. Theuvsen (2004) attests to this sentiment by stating that coercive bureaucracies are characterized by low employee autonomy, and mistrust and suspicion in the event of deviations from organizational rules and regulations that are designed to avert shirking. Du Gay (2005) presents a similar argument by mentioning that ideally, jurisdiction rules and regulations meant developed and documented for shirking prevention are one characteristic of bureaucracy. Indeed, the rules are designed as an instrument to be utilized by superiors in evaluating whether or not the employees’ actions align with regulation delineated in strictly maintained policy documents. The abrogation of individual employee autonomy in bureaucratic systems, accompanied by the creation of social distance, makes bureaucracy an irrelevant phenomenon with respect to contemporary organizational studies. This is because rules and regulation serve to not only deny employees the opportunity to respond positively and proactively to certain unique situations, but also the opportunity to recognize
Furthermore, Weber illustrates several ways in which these changes may affect people’s lives, including how rationalization and bureaucratization may lead to an imbalance in power distribution, promote disenchantment and dehumanization, and trap people in an ‘iron cage’ or rationality. By demonstrating concrete ways in which both these processes may alter individuals’ experiences, Weber is able to provide substantial support to abstract concepts, which further strengthens his claim. Overall, Weber does produce a
In reality, most employees pretend to be non-assertive, let others make decisions but remain resentful to a resolution reached. Despite allowing the top management makes a vital decision on the conflict most team members remain aggressive. They use their powers to pass a clear stand that the autocratic interventions are non-satisfactory.
In life there’s always a structure. There is always a totem pole of who leads and who follows. Those who follow will follow as they should, they respect their leader. They look up to the leader. If subordinates don’t respect and follow the leader their system will crash.