Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Controversies of gun control and restrictions
History on gun control in america
Essay gun control history united states mla
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Controversies of gun control and restrictions
Discussion Post 9 – EM101
I believe film can be very effective in creating awareness around the issue of violence of education, as films I watched around the topic of violence during high school have resonated with me. I previously watched Bowling for Columbine in grade 11, and was very surprised to see how gun control was in the United States in Comparison to Canada. As I watched the film for the second time during this week’s lesson I remembered many scenes vividly, as the issues discussed in the film are very informative and were easily communicated though the film.
In the film, there is a scene where an individual working at the bank explains to Michael Moore the process of getting a free gun if he opened an account with them. This scene was very surprising for myself as I could visualize how easy the process is to acquire a gun in the United States. I believe viewing this scene in a film, opposed to reading about it, is more informative to the viewer because they witness the actual process. Film can communicate a message that causes an emotional reaction to the viewer. I think if I were to read the same dialogue between the bank and Moore it would not have the same impact on me as it does not create a strong emotional reaction. I think audio also has
…show more content…
Biographical films regarding education usually communicate issues of violence with a slight fictional aspect to create entertainment. However, documentaries are very effective because they incorporate the actual scenarios that occurred, narrated by actual witnesses and experts. In Bowling for Columbine, Moore justifies the causes the Columbine Massacre by exploring real life events that made caused tragedy, such as examples of gun control in the U.S and looking in depth at the American perspectives on gun laws, which educates the viewer through an accurate
Michael Moore’s documentary, “Bowling for Columbine,” attempts to expose the truth of gun violence in the United States of America. While his argument is persuasive, its impact is lessened with his use of logical fallacies, such as hasty generalization, post hoc, and appeal to doubtful authority. Moore’s film is thrillingly entertaining, but it is hard to look past the gaping holes in some of his logic.
Hysteria. Terror. Paranoia. All words used to describe feelings after a school disturbance. Reports of such emergencies from mainstream media outlets cause some to conclude extraordinary security breaches happen on an almost daily basis. However, schools are actually safeguarded; in recent years, protocols have been installed in schools across the United States to ensure safety. The catalyst: nationwide panic and suffering after an act of terror at a high school in Littleton, Colorado. Journalist and author Dave Cullen, in his book, Columbine, narrates the horror surrounding this shooting. Cullen’s purpose is to inform readers by captivating their attention utilizing emotional language. He establishes contrasting characters and alludes to significant
In the documentary “Bowling for Columbine” directed by Michael Moore there are two scenes that share the same idea of questioning the laws they have in the U.S.A. The first documentary that captivated my attention was the Columbine High School massacre, where Michael Moore examines the culture of guns and violence in America. He used archival footage, camera techniques and sound to give authenticity and strength to the disturbing event. Michael Moore uses specific techniques enabling the audience to empathize with the survivors and their loved ones in order for the viewers to feel their emotions.
Michael Moore created the documentary Bowling for Columbine to investigate why shootings like the Columbine High School massacre happen, and, in general, why America has the killing rates it does. He strategically does this by walking the viewers through what many believe to be reasons for gun violence in America, and he shows how they are just fallacies. Even though it may not be apparent at first, it seems that Moore has created a list of fallacies. For example, Moore shows that some believe our violent history, violent games and movies, racial diversity, or easy accessibility to firearms is responsible for the killings in the United States. Like a process of elimination he crosses each one off of his list, demonstrating their implausibilities
Bowling for Columbine, directed by Michael Moore, has been given numerous awards for the best documentary. For many, such as Jim Ferguson of KMSB-TV, he says, “Moore has done it again, the year’s most powerful documentary. An eye opener" (Bowling for Columbine). Yes, a real eye opener to how Moore will rely on fictitious facts and his audience’s sympathy towards certain events to get his message across. Documentaries have many different modes of presenting their material. Mockumentaries define itself as “fictional films which parody the forms and conventions of documentary, often for humorous effect” (Bowling for Columbine). While Bowling for Columbine does not exactly classify as a mockumentary, it does ridicule many of the events or people portrayed throughout the film. However, Moore shapes the viewers’ thoughts about guns during this film by appealing to their emotions with events such as the Columbine shooting, Kayla Rolland’s murder and the issue of how the United States has the most deaths by guns. Documentaries remain neutral and only present information for the audience’s benefit or to tell history. Bowling for Columbine reflects a bias documentary because all “facts” presented are told only as Moore views it. However, these “facts”, false in nature, do not show both sides to the story. Many like Ferguson believe Bowling for Columbine to be an eye opener and true, it does open eyes to the harsh reality of the United States and how people kill each other because of they live in a “culture of fear”; however, it fails to give the complete truth to many of the events given.
From this quote alone it is apparent that Moore structured Bowling For Columbine in a way that would rally the people of America behind tighter gun control. It’s because of this that it becomes even more apparent that Bowling For Columbine was structured in away to provoke emotion and from that promotes the idea that many of its scenes were structured. This is the clearest indication of Moore’s influence as a filmmaker with in the documentary. However although probably the biggest ethical issues, he certainly raises debate with his lack of empathy when interviewing people.
Many responders would believe that this movie is a misleading act based on Mike Moore’s self-promotion. When looking beneath the surface however, we can see that the film is trying to say something about America, even though there is no clear answer to the question being asked. This is why the film is a post-structural text. There is more than one answer and texts are interpreted depending on the responder’s context. It is not a documentary however because a documentary is a discussion based on evidence for and against. Although Bowling for Columbine provides facts, it is biased. Mike Moore presents a film that is dialogical in nature. He arranges questions and scenes in the film to get the answer or response that he wants. Also, the camera used is analogous to Moore’s own gun. He targets certain people and appears on the scene so as to make himself seem bigger. His camera is also used to ‘shoot’ people with questions that he already knows the answer to. This happens to people such as the bank employees and youths Bent and BJ and this is why responders may think the film is a reason for self-promotion.
In American society, violence runs rampage throughout the country that cause its citizens to be afraid and discouraged about their homeland. One of the major parts of American violence is from guns. In the documentary, "Bowling for Columbine", a famous filmmaker, Michael Moore addresses the ubiquitous situation in America. He argues that the use of gun in America co-insides or correlates to the recent massacres and that America, as a whole, should have stricter gun control laws. Throughout the film, Moore uses specific references to it and employs rhetorical and persuasive devices to construct his argument in favor of changing gun laws.
Moore’s documentary could be looked at from several points of view in many different ways, but my attention focused on two very different points of bias: His research and interviews. Moore picked out very efficient stories that included tragedies and the loss of loved ones, to have such an immense effect on people. Many people could argue with me that his choice of research was not biased, but merely pointing out important facts people should know. I think otherwise. Moore has access to publish any story he felt necessary to emphasise his message clearly but evidently chose one that would give an immediate reaction towards its audience. He circled his film around guns being in the possession of children who would either find or locate a gun in their guardians’ homes, for an objective such as, bringing t...
The Techniques of Michael Moore in Bowling For Columbine to Present the Message on Gun Control
The columbine massacre the day where no one is safe in school or out of school. The columbine massacre is about two students named Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris both seniors 17 years old both two weeks before graduating they killed 12 students, one teacher, and 21 injured to their shooting on April 20, 1999. Both Dylan and Eric were some believe they were bullied by the sport teams in their school so they planned to kill the people who bullied them and other mostly anyone who gets in their way but that wasn’t really why the FBI he said that there target was everyone no one in pacify we will not get in to more details now. Dylan and Eric were both intelligent boys with solid parents and a good home and both had brothers younger than them. They played soccer, baseball, and both enjoyed to work on computers. Both boys were thinking on commit suicide on 1997 but instead started to plan a massacre in 1998 a year before it happened. Then the two boys had got into some trouble for breaking into a van on January 30, 1998 trying to steal some fuses and wires for bombs for them to make, but they got caught in trouble. So the court put them in a program called the juvenile diversion program, but even if they were there they were still planning the massacre and the court also put Eric in some angry management classes and people believe it worked but it didn’t he just did it to look like it work and both boys made it look like they were really sorry but they weren’t. Dylan and Eric both really hated everyone in their school and the court as well after they got caught breaking in to that van that’s when they really started to plan the massacre more and that’s when Harris started he’s journals no one really knows way but they didn’t hate a hand...
that since the KKK was evil, that the NRA is also evil as it is made
I believe that one theme of this book is, that you should always watch what you say, how you
Michael Moore’s documentary focused on the shooting at Columbine High School in Colorado. Michael Moore searched for the answers as to why the two students decided to enter the school and shoot at the students. Moore begins by explaining his experience with guns where he grew up and how he is a member of the NRA (National Rifle Association).
The nonfiction novel Columbine is very focused on providing a storyline of the event on April 20th,1999. "Eric and Dylan planned to be dead shortly after the weekend, but Friday night they had a little work to do: one last shift at Blackjack." (Chapter 4, p. 16). Through this quote you can see that the book follows directly what happened on the day of and before the massacre. The book gives you a step to step guide to everything that happened leading up to, during and after the shooting. You are given the chance to be in the shoes of someone living through this and are given a sense of what it felt like to experience such a tragedy and because of all the detail you are made to feel as if you were apart of it. Through this the novel achieves its main goal of teaching the audience about what really happen that day. Whereas the documentary is very focused on gun control problems and violence in America. “If more guns make people safer, then America would be one of the safest countries in the world. It isn't. It's the opposite” says a Canadian in the documentary Bowling for Columbine. The documentary is very focused on gun control and in it they are constantly going around interviewing people on different aspects of gun control. The documentary although inspired by Columbine and named after it, only briefly talks about what