Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gun violence in society essay
Gun violence in our society
Gun control and education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Bowling for Columbine” was a documentary film by Michael Moore which I found to be interesting, humorous, and an eye opener. “Bowling for Columbine" reminds us that this is a society where more than 11,000 people die every year from guns, where TV news and entertainment programs produce violent images, where banks give away rifles to customers, and where the public lives in fear of being robbed and killed. It shows us how easy it is to get a hand on a gun. The major reason for Moore to engage this subject was a tragic event. On April 20, 1999, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, went bowling in their peaceful hometown of Littleton, Colorado. Only hours later, they entered into Columbine High School and opened fire on their classmates and teachers, More deaths occur in this country because of guns than in any other country in the world. Why is this? Although the film discusses this question in depth, there is never an answer really given. It makes you think about it yourself and ask questions. That is one of the reasons why I enjoyed the film. It gives you all different perspectives on guns and violence and lets you decide what you believe. You can see this clearly in the film. Michael Moore, the director and producer of the film, is a member of NRA but at the same time is criticizing the way guns are used in the United States. He gives you clear point of views from multiple sides. In the film it is stated that the Americans are very anxious people, which come for example from all the pictures about war and bloodshed shown in the television every day! Nearly every American has a gun to defend his house from burglars, while the Canadians never lock their house doors, even if there was a break-in once in their house. But the American media can 't be the only reason for Attempts to determine why gun violence in America occurs a lot compared to other countries. In bowling for Columbine, Michael Moore tries to bring some very important points to the foreground of American culture and to some degree succeeds, however, by manipulating different things in this movie it makes it hard for me to totally agree with what he has to say. One point Mr. Moore and I do agree on is that racism, specifically against African American males is still very alive in America. Also, I agree that the media tries to find a quick and easy scapegoat to place the blame on because it is easier than to actually deal with the bigger picture. However, I do not agree with his portrayal of the NRA as a bunch of crazy insensitive people carrying around guns and not caring about the feelings of mourning families. Mr. Moore does a good job of manipulating things to make people believe what he wants then to believe. In the movie Bowling for Columbine, Michael Moore points out that the NRA holds rallies shortly after gun related incidents including Columbine and in Flint Michigan. Overall I think Bowling for Columbine is a great film by Michael Moore and it helps shines light on a great concern in the United States today, because althought this shooting took place in 1990 you have some today in recent time such as the Sandy Hooks
"Columbine High School Shootings." History.com. A&E Television Networks, n.d. Web. 08 Sept. 2015. Eighteen year old Eric Harris and seventeen year old Dylan Klebold were two boys with a fascination of violent video games and music. These young men were known to be “goth” and were bullied all throughout their high school careers because of their different interest. In 1999, on April 20th these boys went into their high school with mixed emotions and a devious plan to get revenge. The two teens went into the high school with handguns and killed both students and faculty members, before they turned the guns around on themselves. This is a reliable source because it informed us of both previous emotion, and the aftermath of the tragedy with detail about the boys, the school and the lives affected. This source was relevant for me because of how thoroughly it described the shooting, and gave me background information as to why and how it happened.
Michael Moore’s documentary, “Bowling for Columbine,” attempts to expose the truth of gun violence in the United States of America. While his argument is persuasive, its impact is lessened with his use of logical fallacies, such as hasty generalization, post hoc, and appeal to doubtful authority. Moore’s film is thrillingly entertaining, but it is hard to look past the gaping holes in some of his logic.
Hysteria. Terror. Paranoia. All words used to describe feelings after a school disturbance. Reports of such emergencies from mainstream media outlets cause some to conclude extraordinary security breaches happen on an almost daily basis. However, schools are actually safeguarded; in recent years, protocols have been installed in schools across the United States to ensure safety. The catalyst: nationwide panic and suffering after an act of terror at a high school in Littleton, Colorado. Journalist and author Dave Cullen, in his book, Columbine, narrates the horror surrounding this shooting. Cullen’s purpose is to inform readers by captivating their attention utilizing emotional language. He establishes contrasting characters and alludes to significant
Michael Moore created the documentary Bowling for Columbine to investigate why shootings like the Columbine High School massacre happen, and, in general, why America has the killing rates it does. He strategically does this by walking the viewers through what many believe to be reasons for gun violence in America, and he shows how they are just fallacies. Even though it may not be apparent at first, it seems that Moore has created a list of fallacies. For example, Moore shows that some believe our violent history, violent games and movies, racial diversity, or easy accessibility to firearms is responsible for the killings in the United States. Like a process of elimination he crosses each one off of his list, demonstrating their implausibilities
April 20th, 1999, Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, experienced a mass shooting. Thirteen people were injured and more than twenty were injured. Twelve were students and one was a teacher. Two students, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold opened fire on their high school for forty one minutes before turning their guns on themselves and committing suicide. School shootings are notorious for making headline news but in 1999, school shooting were not as prevalent as they are in the present day. The media blew up on the catastrophe that was Columbine and many questions were raised, who were these kids and why did they do this? Speculation arose about why they did it. Maybe they were bullied for being goth and social outcasts or maybe they
Bowling for Columbine is a post-structural film produced by Mike Moore. It leaves a message about America and its people. Today, the world is not a safe place. However, the world is made unsafe by the people who don’t believe it is safe. This is what the film is based on: fear and guns. Bowling For Columbine is a carnivalesque to an extent as it contains many elements of a carnivalesque. These elements are shown through repetition, polyphony of voices and the creation of another world.
Furthermore, Michael Moore proved himself to be a very credible person with his unbiased standpoint, showed the compassion and understanding of the people who were killed by the current guns laws and a logical thinker by doing research of statistical data to provide that there are faults in the current laws. He also shows the viewer that he is a well-informed individual with the famous popular culture television show "South Park". From beginning to the end of the argument you can find symbolism and key points that he wants to live in a better America and he does so by constructing rhetorical and persuasive devices to construct his in favor of changing gun laws. Works Cited The "Colorado - History." Colorado - History - History.
Unlike most of the country, I knew about Columbine High School on April 19, 1999. I knew that the Columbine Rebels had a good football team, I remembered how they beat Cherry Creek for the 1999 football championship. I knew what Columbine's building was like from when I was inside it in January for a debate tournament. I had friends that went to CHS. We had gone on a trip to Hawaii together to learn about biology. The rest of the country found out about Columbine High School on April 20, 1999. They didn't hear about their football team, the debate tournament they hosted, or my friends, though; they heard about two angry students, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, that went on a killing rampage killing 12 other students, a teacher, and themselves. The nation, the media, the killers, my friends, and me all have their own view of what happened that day. Many people tried to understand how something so terrible could happen, while the killers thought that the killings were a wonderful thing, and still other students were trying to comprehend that this tragedy had actually happened so close to home.
The columbine massacre the day where no one is safe in school or out of school. The columbine massacre is about two students named Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris both seniors 17 years old both two weeks before graduating they killed 12 students, one teacher, and 21 injured to their shooting on April 20, 1999. Both Dylan and Eric were some believe they were bullied by the sport teams in their school so they planned to kill the people who bullied them and other mostly anyone who gets in their way but that wasn’t really why the FBI he said that there target was everyone no one in pacify we will not get in to more details now. Dylan and Eric were both intelligent boys with solid parents and a good home and both had brothers younger than them. They played soccer, baseball, and both enjoyed to work on computers. Both boys were thinking on commit suicide on 1997 but instead started to plan a massacre in 1998 a year before it happened. Then the two boys had got into some trouble for breaking into a van on January 30, 1998 trying to steal some fuses and wires for bombs for them to make, but they got caught in trouble. So the court put them in a program called the juvenile diversion program, but even if they were there they were still planning the massacre and the court also put Eric in some angry management classes and people believe it worked but it didn’t he just did it to look like it work and both boys made it look like they were really sorry but they weren’t. Dylan and Eric both really hated everyone in their school and the court as well after they got caught breaking in to that van that’s when they really started to plan the massacre more and that’s when Harris started he’s journals no one really knows way but they didn’t hate a hand...
5. I do not think it was appropriate fir the NRA to arrive in Denver for a convention after the Columbine massacre occurred. I think people were still in mourning and alls they wanted was to be left alone. The people in Denver probably wanted nothing but to ban guns, and here comes the N R A thinking everyone should have the right to have a gun in order to protect themselves. I think the N R A should have waited a great deal of time before going to Denver for a convention.
Recently, after the shootings in Columbine High School, King spoke about his thoughts on the subject. King said that the shootings were a “personal blow to my heart.” King was against violence. “Again and again, in these shootings we see access to guns… If you want your schools to be safe, if you want your streets to be safe, restrict handguns.”
McMahan backs up his premises by showing that in other “Western Countries, per capita homicide rates, as well as rates of violent crime involving guns, are a fraction of what they are in the United States.” (McMahan, 4). Gun advocates deny this claim, but then what could be the reason for the United States being the homicide capital of the developed world? Essentially, I believe that McMahan has a solid, compelling argument that makes readers believe that we should take more steps in the direction of banning guns. The analogies he places within the article make for a descriptive, persuasive argument, yet McMahan lacks statistics and factual information to back up his claims.
The United States will not soon forget the rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Connecticut that came just two weeks before Christmas last year. This tragic event resulted in the death of twenty students and eight adults. Although the event shocked the nation, rampage shootings are nothing new. Over the years, many families have lost loved ones to these horrific events. As a result, these mass shootings such as the one that occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary caught public attention leading to a push to find the cause of these events. Out of this research a variety of possible causes came to light consisting of arguments stating that high school bullying, availability of guns, mental illness, violent movies and video games are the cause of mass shootings. However, these researchers and debaters tend to ignore the role of massive media coverage in the increase of copycat shootings in the United States.
Vince Coglianese explains thoroughly in his article “ACLU Says Reid's Gun Legislation Could Threaten Privacy Rights, Civil Liberties” about one side of how many would feel if background checks were extensive: “More extensive background checks and requirements can be an invasion of privacy, such as medical records and personal information.” Even though sales would require more client information, the knowledge of their medical records can help determine whether they can handle the responsibility of a firearm. The same thing goes for the knowledge of criminal records. If Devin Patrick Kelley, the texas church shooter, had his medical and criminal records checked he would not have be eligible to receive a gun and would have raised flags in the system; and if the Aurora, Colorado Movie theater shooter, James Holmes had his medical records given, he too would be deemed unfit to carry and own a firearm. Dave Cullen’s news article “The Depressive and the Psychopath: At last we know why the Columbine killers did it,” details how the mentality and year planning that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold went through when attempting to shoot and bomb Columbine High School; they were deemed psychotic and homicidal and yet still managed to receive guns. Ex-convicts or those who have a history with violence can be automatically identified and flagged for the denial of a firearm or to be constantly
On April 20, 1999, within the tiny, suburban city of Littleton, Colorado, two high-school seniors, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, enacted a full-scale assault on columbine high school throughout the middle of the school day. The boys' idea was to kill many of their colleagues. With guns, knives, and a large number of bombs, the two boys walked the hallways and killed. Once the day was done, twelve students, one teacher, as well as the two murderers were dead; and 21 of them were wounded. The haunting question remains: why did they decide to do this?