Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Censorship in schools cons
Censorship in schools cons
Banned books in schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Censorship in schools cons
The Board of Education has started to limit our rights as citizens of the United States of America. They have set new rules that infringe our civil rights. Things as such as limiting students to learn about real world problems such as war in other countries. The school has started express ourselves much less than we should be able to. Students can no longer read what they want anymore because they have started banning books. The school has put these rules that should not be in place. Such as not being able to speak about current events, banning some literature books, or dress policy. These three reasons have been major issues that have infringed our civil rights.
Students are not allowed to talk about the major things that happen around the world.
Limits people's rights on what they can talk about. Students are
…show more content…
The school is not only infringing our but the writes of authors. The schools have started banning book because of many reasons. Such as racial issues or it encourages bad lifestyles. Book’s can encourage life choices but not most of the time. Most of the book’s students read is fictional books which is all stuff we can not do in real life. Such as flying, breathing underwater or being a magical powers. Children’s books have been banned because of this type of stuff. Such as the beloved book by many children “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz”. This children’s book has been banned from school because it has “no value for children today” (utulsa.edu). Can you say that a story that a story that portrays love, kindness, and unselfishness shows value for the children in the world of today (utulsa.edu). These are the issues that occur when the school starts to limit our rights such as freedom of press. We should be able to have a choice to be able to read what we what. The school has already chosen that we may not read some books because of the content. The school should not ban book because of the content
...etter than ignorance. Book censorship should not limit the amount of knowledge a child can receive, instead, books should be used to benefit children in their education and future career.
Countries worldwide actively call for the banning of books that are found to be politically inconvenient, religiously awkward, or embarrassing in one form or another. But for writers like Russia's Vasily Grossman, a book's ban means far more than just a dip in sales. In 1961, he pleaded with the Soviet censors, "I am physically free, but the book to which I have dedicated my life is in jail." (Merkelson). A book represents an idea, thus limiting access to a book is banning the representation of an idea. The banning of books in American schools should not be allowed, because banning books will prevent students from learning the reason for the controversy and alternate viewpoints they can come to on their own.
This is just down right wrong because it’s unwarranted to give the right to do such a thing to schools and not to government. Thesis Schools have more rights than the government to affect and restrict the 1st Amendment and freedom of speech. Annotated Bibliography Hudson, David L., JR. " First Amendment Center. "
The American Association of School Administrators (AASA) defines censorship as: “The removal, suppression, or restricted circulation of literary, artistic, or educational materials… of images, ideas, and information…on the grounds that these are morally or otherwise objectionable in light of standards applied by the censor” (Miner 1998). In schools there are three types of censorship, one type is a “parent who doesn’t want their child to read a particular book. Another is a parent, teacher, administrator, or school board member who argues that no one in the class, or school should read the book in dispute. Lastly, there is censorship that involves someone who is part of an organized campaign, whether of a local or national group, and who goes in ready for a fight and wants to make a broader political point” (Miner 1998). Although there are many others ways that a piece of literature could get censored, most censored works are asked to be removed from classrooms and school libraries.
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
School boards and teachers have a responsibility for protecting the minds of their students and covering age appropriate material. However, does this responsibility cover the extreme act of banning books from school classrooms? Does not the teacher have a duty to introduce to their students world issues in order to better the students ability to cope with problems in the world? How does a school decide which books should be banned from the classroom, and should it be left up to the teacher to decide what is decided in his/her classroom. By banning books from the classroom, we prevent our students from learning about controversial topics in a safe environment, and we also encroach upon the student’s freedom of reading what they want in school.
The subject of censorship is a very controversial one, especially the banning of books. Many people believe they must protect themselves and others from the "evils" of many classic books and works of art because they can be deemed "indecent" in one way or another. Many believe that this is absurd and censorship in its current form is a violation of our First Amendment right to free speech. Personally, I align myself with the latter, however I do feel there are occasions where censorship is justifiable.
Censorship in School Libraries The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional.
Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database. This article addresses some of the reasons that censors attempt to remove books from the curriculum: Many censors feel that works are not age appropriate for students. Staff, Wire Reports. (2002 October 3). Book banning spans the globe.
Banning Books in Schools Recently, school administers have been banning books from the library. Books are an important part of a student’s life because they help them explore and learn new things. They open a student’s mind to infinite possibilities and imaginations. Schools shouldn’t be able to ban certain books from students as it takes away their freedom to choose. Other people say schools are responsible for banning and protecting inappropriate books from their students.
In an article, it shows how students can obtain the skills they had committed to their memory from those fiction books they have read. It can lead to many and great or amazing opportunities for the ones who need the support after all they have been through. There are fiction books that can change other’s lives by reading a book, or even watching a movie that is
“Censorship is the child of fear and the father of ignorance”. – Laurie Henderson. By banning books, it can deprive children the information or the mental nourishment they will need for life. Personally, it’s not the best objective for children to be brought up and not know the capabilities of the real world. Due to that, when a child grows up and goes out into the world they wouldn’t be as efficient on how to handle themselves on their own, due to the “protected state of mind” that they were taught.
Banning books isn’t uncommon. Books can be banned for many reasons such as violence, sexual content, or just plain “garbage”. It’s understandable that some things should be censored when it comes to children since everything they take in is absorbed. Where the line is drawn is banning books to the public. In some cases, books have been banned from public libraries.
Having the freedom to read ties in to freedom of speech, and you should have the right to all righting’s good or bad. Then again, it is up to adults and faculty to ban books and sadly, kids and students have no say in what is banned. Some books contain violence and inappropriate content that is not suitable for some ages. However, school boards should not be allowed to ban books from school libraries. Students should be able to have a say in the books banned, and be able to read what they want.
It Should Be Illegal To Ban Books Should it be legal to ban books? Books get banned for many of reasons, such as inappropriate language, sexual content, racism, or it’s too depressing, but should we really take someone’s right away to read a book just because someone deems it too mature or too depressing to read. No, we should not. It should be illegal to ban books.