Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
It Should Be Illegal To Ban Books
Should it be legal to ban books? Books get banned for many of reasons, such as inappropriate language, sexual content, racism, or it’s too depressing, but should we really take someone’s right away to read a book just because someone deems it too mature or too depressing to read. No, we should not. It should be illegal to ban books.
When the government bans a book it infringes on our freedom of the press and freedom of expression, which is part of our First Amendment. Fred Cate a Professor of Law at Indiana University School of Law established that “the First Amendment states that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable”,
…show more content…
“Protecting children from the difficult realities of the world is an exercise in futility”, which means protecting children from the horrific genuineness of the world is impractical (Leigh). Nowadays children are on the internet and banning a book so your child doesn’t get exposed to bad language or any unpleasant facts about the world is pointless because they most likely already have on the internet or even from kids at school. You could always just not allow your child to read the book you're trying to ban or if anything letting them read that book could let them “open their minds, or even offer them something to identify with” (Leigh). Sherman Alexie, the author of the book The Absolutely True Story of a Part Time Indian, said “ Almost every day, my mailbox is filled with handwritten letters from students,-teens and preteens- who have read my YA book and loved it. I have yet to receive a letter from a child somehow debilitated by the domestic violence, drug abuse, racism, poverty, sexuality, and murder contained in my book.” (Yabroff). His book had made the list of the frequently challenged books twice, and was banned from schools, in Washington, Missouri, and Wyoming, but he hasn’t had one complaint or anything from someone saying their child was affected negatively from his book, not because it is new either it has been out since
...etter than ignorance. Book censorship should not limit the amount of knowledge a child can receive, instead, books should be used to benefit children in their education and future career.
The Constitution states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Even though books may influence young minds with negative thinking, society shouldn’t ban books because it prohibits learning and it violates the First Amendment in the Constitution. Banning books takes away the author’s right, some books can be very educational, and it takes away the children’s choice of what they get to read.
By forbidding the reading of certain books, the first amendment rights of every American citizen are violated. The first amendment of the U.S. Constitution clearly states that all citizens have freedom of speech as well as freedom of press (Book Banning 1). By banning a book and making it so that no one can read it, the government is keeping the author from expressing their thoughts and opinions through press. The freedom of choice is also violated due to the inability of reading that particular book as an option. Not only the first amendment rights are violated, but also the academic freedom and diversity of thought guaranteed and protected by the constitution (Teachers 1). History will show that Americans do not take the violation of their rights lightly, and are more than likely to protest. Sometimes, in more extreme cases, they will rebel.
...ailable in public libraries, parents or guardians should monitor what their children are reading anyhow. If I were a teacher I would not teach or read about this book in my classroom. There is no knowledgeable information in the books; they are for entertainment purpose only. I would also not suggest that any of my students read the books. If they find them on their own that would be perfectly fine.
Banning a book takes a person’s rights away that have already banned guaranteed by the First Amendment. Congress can not make any laws that interfere with an individual’s rights. The First Amendment “protects an individual’s
Trelease, Jim. "Book Banning Violates Children and Young Adult Freedoms." Book Banning. Ed. Ronnie D. Lankford. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. At Issue. Rpt. from "Censorship and Children's Books." Trelease-on-Reading.com. 2006.Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
“It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer. The children are the real losers because they are the ones that are not able to read the classic works of literature which are the backbone of classroom discussions all across the United States.
People should be allowed to read whatever they want to read, even if it is a touchy subject to someone else. Although some people mainly believe in the banning of books due to explicit content, it actually causes a negative effect on people and children. Not only does it take away the people’s first amendment rights, but it also shelters children from real life situations that might affect their future. Banning books is unconstitutional and shelters children.
The first amendment of the U.S. Constitution states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances (Buchanan).” With the banning and the challenging of books all over the U.S. I believe that our first amendment is being jeopardized. We should be allowed to read whatever we want to read it is our right according to the first amendment in the U.S. Constitution with freedom of speech.
It is a book that my child may never be able to read. It seems that the only logical reasoning to aid in what offends people is to completely eliminate the book from the library. A better approach is to understand that this book may help them examine other beliefs, attitudes, values, and traditions and to accept, tolerate, or even reject these ideas without prejudices against people who hold particular views. In the democracy In which we live, where regularly all ideas are debatable. A wide range on all points of view should be available to the public.
Some parents think that the Harry Potters books should be banned from school libraries. Parents feel that they should have the right to demand that schools censor their children’s reading materials. In my opinion, schools should give parents the right to censor their children’s reading materials. Parents want the best for their kids and their kids’ education is really important to them. Harry Potter book series are very interesting to a lot of people. However, some of the Harry Potter books are not the type of books that should be in school libraries. A major concern for some parents about the Harry Potter books is that the stories legitimize the idea of witchcraft. Some parents don’t agree with the message behind the Harry Potter book series.
What kids are reading should be their parents responsibility. Parents know their kids personality and maturity levels best, so they are the most suited for helping their kids decide what the can and cannot read. When parents choose to challenge books and attempt to have them taken off of shelves, they are not only preventing their own child from reading them but all the other people
Every year there is a week dedicated to banned books. We celebrate banned books but still have them banned because either they aren’t appropriate or they do not agree with schools or possibly a certain organization. Banned Books Week promotes books that have been challenged by the public. It also promotes freedom of books from schools, libraries and books stores. Books should not be allowed to be banned by schools and/ or organizations because it is compromising the first amendment.
The Diary of Anne Frank, The Scarlet Letter, and To Kill a Mockingbird all have something in common. These books not only have been staples in english curriculum across the nation for many years, but they also have been banned and challenged time after time for their content. Although theses novels teach valuable lessons, some people cannot seem to look past certain parts of their plots. Many groups have taken action to ban an abundance of books that they personally feel people should not be exposed to. Banning books prevents a well rounded education, takes away the right to choose what to read, and will ultimately have no real purpose because people will be exposed to
Books will introduce them to the fun parts of the world or their imagination. They will also show them the difficult realities as well, but it makes them stronger in their thoughts, opinions, and how they see things. In conclusion, when a book has bad language don’t have it banned because other people enjoy certain books that become banned because of one word.