Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of cyberbullying on teens
Effects of cyberbullying on young children
Government regulation and surveillance of internet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of cyberbullying on teens
To what extent should schools monitor students’ online interactions off-campus? The article “At Some Schools, ‘Big Brother’ is Watching”, written by Kelly Wallace contains evidence explaining why it is such a controversial topic. Some states support the district because they argue schools have the right to monitor students, while other states argue that it is disrupting the freedom of speech. Many students in this generation tend to fall into dangers such as bullying, drug use, violence, and suicide due to the fact that they are not properly supervised. Kelly Wallace believes that schools should definitely do more to monitor students off-campus so that they do not get hurt. I agree with Kelly Wallace that schools should be permitted to …show more content…
So many people in society agree that the online issues students face are very serious. This is a life and death issue so the school needs to get involved because they can greatly help by monitoring exactly what social networks students are on. This way less students will feel like they can torment others outside of school and less students will be put down. Laura, a college student states, “I recently found my 13-year old sister’s Tumblr account with the title ‘Depressed but well dressed’, it immediately made me take action, let my parents know and make sure she got the help she needed” (Wallace). If Laura had not found her sister’s social network account, things could have gone very downhill. Her younger sister could have started to self-harm, get into drugs, or even commit suicide. If Laura had not found the account, no one close to her sister would have found out and helped her get the support she needed. In conclusion, so many schools do not realize how many of their students are facing online issues outside of school and need to take
In “Youthful Indiscretions: Should Colleges Protect Social Network Users from Themselves and Others?” Dana Fleming presents an essay concerning the safety of social networking sites and how Universities can deal and prevent problems. This article is targeted towards school administrators, faculty, and a social networking user audience who will either agree or disagree with her statement. I believe Fleming presents an excellent, substantial case for why she reasons the way she does. Fleming gives a sound, logical argument according to Toulmin’s Schema. This essay has an evident enthymeme, which has a claim and reasons why she believes in that way. Toulmin refers to this as “grounds."
Higher education law attorney Dana L. Fleming voices her controversial opinion in favor of institutionalized involvement in social network protection in her article “Youthful Indiscretions: Should Colleges Protect Social Network Users from Themselves and Others?” (Fleming). Posted in the New England Journal of Higher Education, winter of 2008 issue, Fleming poses the question of responsibility in monitoring students’ online social networking activities. With a growing population of students registering on social networks like Facebook and MySpace, she introduces the concern of safety by saying, “like lawmakers, college administrators have not yet determined how to handle the unique issues posed by the public display of their students’ indiscretions.” However, while Dana Fleming emphasizes the horror stories of social networking gone-bad, she neglects the many positive aspects of these websites and suggests school involvement in monitoring these sites when the role of monitoring should lie with parents or the adult user.
Schools have more rights than the government to affect and restrict the 1st amendment and freedom of speech.
Grabber- We are all privileged to live in a free nation, where we can do what we desire. But, what if one day you were told that your school can monitor your every action on the interweb and can punish you for your online activities on and off campus? Well, certainly many students would protest without hesitating, for that they would no longer have privacy.
Cyberbullying has become more of a problem over the past years. With technology being in such high demand and there being endless options. Students can use and abuse technology in a negative light. Since technology isn’t going anywhere cyberbullying will only worsen. The First Amendment rights along with the school’s handbook, student handbook and states policies and procedure are meant to protect students from such harm. A students’ rights and privacy must be protected with such things implemented and actions are taken cyberbullying can become
This evidence helps explain why schools should not limit students’ online speech because it didn’t cause a substantial disruption. A reason why schools should not limit students online speech is because of the violation of constitutional rights. We question reports of increasing threats to students online. The number of young people using digital technologies is increasing rapidly, problems online are also expected to rise, simply as a result of increased use. Bullying also has a long history.
Students in high school should be able to wright what they want. Freedom of press states,” The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution gives newspapers, magazines, and other publications the right to print whatever they see fit, without interference from the government. The framers of the Constitution felt that a free press is vital to a democratic society. This important idea breaks down when schools
People say that they like social media? What happens when a photo of a teen’s suspension letter that was posted on social media is discovered by their dream college? Social media is several different websites and apps where users can create and post images and videos online or talk with their friends. Most teenagers use social media every day, and love it. But, some others know better. Social media never affects teenagers in good ways.
Schools should not be able to limit free speech. Firstly, it is unconstitutional. Without freedom of speech, nothing will change. Though it will help with behavioral problems now, it can cause more in the long run. Let me explain.
Letting officials search through your online technology is a complete violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects you from search and seizures. Maria Shepard, a teacher at Princeton Day School in New Jersey, stated that the parent, not the school, should monitor the student’s online activity. It is the responsibility of the parent to monitor and punish the student’s online
Each year, schools are having to update the Code of Conduct in order to keep up with the bullying that is occurring on social media. Schools have failed to effectively monitor and take action upon what these students have been doing to others and what others are doing in return. This has resulted in many lost lawsuits, in which schools were held liable for not taking appropriate action on what occurs outside of campus. School districts therefore must take more responsibility over what happens to the students, on and off campus. Districts argue that such instances are outside of the school’s control, however, these victims are still their students.
There are two main points why schools should not be able to monitor student accounts on social media because some may take it as an attack towards their privacy given to them by the fourth amendment. The other point is that the required resources needed to be used while monitoring can be excessive. Now during the years in high school students learn more about the functions of the government and the rights given to them by the constitution. It is also known that during the high school years students prefer privacy and to an extreme extent go against authority. The students after being taught the fourth amendment which is the right to privacy, they can argue that having their social media monitored can be counted as an unreasonable search without warrant.
as people should have their privacy when surfing the internet. Alternatively, the evidence suggests that the government can help tackle terrorism and stop bullying. After examining this issue closely, surely society could not argue that we should protect our country and our children by monitoring social networking sites? Works Cited http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/aug/09/cyberbullying-mother-fight-askfm http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/aug/19/ask-fm-cyberbully-hannah-smith-death http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/5046447/Facebook-could-be-monitored-by-the-government.html http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/aug/08/askfm-advertisers-cameron-boycott-cyberbullying http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=catfish
Exposing students to the power of social media in the classroom is an important part of preparing them to be active and positive digital citizens in a 21st century world. In the last two years, my own students have rapidly been drawn to Twitter, Instagram, Tumblr, and many other social networking platforms. They upload, share, and connect with others often without any regard to how their digital footprints may reflect them as individuals. Having continuous conversations with students about the choices that they make can lead to positive results. Students don't realize how powerful social media platforms can be in terms of networking, researching, and engaging in academic conversations. It makes me laugh every time I hear them whisper about my colleague Heather's or my Twitter feed. First of all kids, I can hear you. Second of all, yes, social media can be an amazing way to give and exchanged knowledge.
Giving schools the ability to track the student’s social media post is an unwarranted and unreliable approach that is in direct violation of their privacy. This method lacks justification and places too much power in the hands of the school administration. It is an invasion of private life for schools to go hunting on social media for inappropriate content. This approach shows America’s adolescents that freedom of speech, expression and privacy does not need to be respected.