Social Media Bias In Schools Essay

Giving schools the ability to track the student’s social media post is an unwarranted and unreliable approach that is in direct violation of their privacy. This method lacks justification and places too much power in the hands of the school administration. It is an invasion of private life for schools to go hunting on social media for inappropriate content. This approach shows America’s adolescents that freedom of speech, expression and privacy does not need to be respected. It is highly unconstitutional to demand surveillance of one’s personal affairs. What a student chooses to post on his or her social media is free speech that should not warrant in-school penalty. Knowing that the schools staff monitors their post will spoil the sense of self expression that social media presents. It

This prejudice may cause bias in disciplinary-related decision making. Many youth are aware of the fact that what they post can be used against them. They reciprocate by refraining from sharing details that are private. Ephemeral communication apps like Snapchat are popular, which inhibits record of message history. These apps vanish data sent after a certain amount of time, or after a certain amount of newer messages replace it. Also, social media profiles aren’t always identifiable. A student might operate under an anonymous picture and name, causing confusions with punishment. For example, two years ago an anonymous twitter account was created that shared leaked nude pictures of various girls around the Wake Forest-Roseville area. Bullying cannot be stopped, as it can be practically undetectable. Many forms of bullying may leave as little external evidence as a nickname, or excluding a student from a group. These can be just as painful as a punch in the face, but are unnoticeable to school