Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of freedom of speech in education
Freedom of speech in schools essay
Freedom of speech in schools essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of freedom of speech in education
Should schools take students Freedom of Speech? Schools should not be able to limit free speech. Firstly, it is unconstitutional. Without freedom of speech, nothing will change. Though it will help with behavioral problems now, it can cause more in the long run. Let me explain. First of all, the freedom of speech is an amendment in the bill of rights, which means that it cannot be taken from us. In the preamble of the constitution, it states We the people in order to form a more perfect union, which means a country that is nearly perfect, that doesn't take away a persons right to talk freely. So, I believe that taking the students' freedom to speak freely should be punishable, because our forefathers clearly stated against it. The punishments for being unconstitutional are losing the democracy of our country, the structure and much more. If we start taking away students' freedom of speech then it gets easier to take away average citizens freedom of speech and so on and so forth. Also by taking away the students' freedom of speech, the students don't learn as well because the teachers get lazier and students cannot object to it. Then when they grow up, they haven't learned correctly and slowly our country crumbles. …show more content…
Secondly, without the freedom of speech the students won't be able to object to anything, nothing will change because there will be no feed back for the teachers to know to change.
Well let's say that a new form of lunch is introduced that everyone hates, but because they can't speak of their own free will, they can't say that they don't like
it. Last of all, taking the students' freedom to speak, will temporarily stop behavioral issues. Most fights begin with cross words but without their ability to speak there will be no cross words. At least until someone gets so filled up with them that they have to release them. Making more behavior problems than ever before. In many ways taking the students' freedom to speak is harming because some students have families at home that refuse to let them speak so school is the only place that they get a say in something and then you take that away. That can cause low self-worth taking children will to be here at school. That creates more dropouts, further diminishing our country's structure and view in other countries' eyes even more. In conclusion, I believe that taking away students' freedom of speech will ultimately cause more chaos, because it is unconstitutional, because no problems will change, and it will undoubtedly create even more behavior problems.
The case also states “A prohibition against expression of opinion, without any evidence that the rule is necessary to avoid substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others, is not permissible under the First and Fourteenth Amendments” (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District). Because the students didn 't necessarily disrupt the education process, their First Amendment freedom of speech should not have been violated by the school officials.
The school district appealed the decision, arguing that the speech had a disruptive effect on the educational process. The school district said it had an interest in protecting an audience of minors from indecent speech in the school. The school board believed it had the right to control language that was used during a school-sponsored activity. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court.
The First Amendment of the United States gives citizens the five main rights to freedom. Freedom of speech is one of the rights. If people did not have the freedom of speech there would be no way of expressing one’s self and no way to show individuality between beliefs. This Amendment becomes one of the issues in the Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District Supreme Court case that happened in December of 1969. In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines there were five students that got suspended for wearing armbands to protest the Government’s policy in Vietnam. Wearing these armbands was letting the students express their beliefs peacefully. Many people would consider that the school did not have the authority to suspend these petitioners because of the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.
One reason why schools shouldn't limit students' online speech is that students have the freedom of speech which says that they can express themselves and have their own opinion.
On the other hand, students have the right to speak out for what they believe in without having any interference; they have the right to voice their opinion. This protection is all due to the first amendment protection. The first amendment protects the students and also the teachers’ freedom of speech, that includes during and out of school. With the protection of the first amendment no person is able to violate your right to freedom of speech. Any pers...
Total freedom does not exist. Being American has made some people believe that they have the freedom to do whatever they want, but this isn’t the case. In this day and age students are free to use texting, social media, and they also have access to various other things on the internet. Some students use these resources responsibly and do not abuse these methods, but on the other hand some students use these resources immaturely and usually cause great dilemmas that can extend to their school life. Consequently, schools should be allowed to limit students’ online speech because cyberbullying can cause widespread problems among both students and teachers, it disrupts learning, and it violates students’ civil rights.
The State should have not made it a mandatory procedure in public schools. They did not have the right to do so because of what the Constitution states. The Supreme Court made is very clear what the violations were and why the State was wrong and why the State lost the case. For a state government to not allow freedom of speech is illegal and violates the Bill of Rights. I agree with the verdict of the Supreme Court because what the government of Virginia did was disgraceful and contradicts the United States
In recent years, a rise in verbal abuse and violence directed at people of color, lesbians, and gay men, and other historically persecuted groups has plagued the United States. Among the settings of these expressions of intolerance are college and university campuses, where bias incidents have occurred sporadically since the mid-1980's. Outrage, indignation and demands for change are the responses to these incidents - understandably, given the lack of racial and social diversity among students, faculty and administrators on most campuses. Many universities, under pressure to respond to the concerns of those who are the objects of hate, have adopted codes or olicies prhibiting speech that offends any group based on race gender, ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation. That's the wrong response, well-meaning or not. The First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects speech no matter how offensive its content.
The problem is that cyberbullying is an act that must be stopped, but putting limits on students' online speech is unnecessary. If you are not familiar with the word cyberbullying, it is a is when an individual is tormented, threatened, harassed, humiliated, embarrassed or otherwise targeted by another individual using the Internet, interactive and digital technologies. But yet again I bring the point that schools should not limit the amount of students online speech. Schools must protect students’ First Amendment rights, but also maintain the learning environment and safety at school. Three main reasons why schools should not limit students online speech are there is not a large percentage affected, it does not cause a significant disruption, and it is a violation of constitutional rights.
Students’ rights in schools are limited or just taken away. Kids are forced to do whatever the officials at their school, either the principal or the teachers, tell the students to do. One of the main right that gets taken away or limited is students’ first amendment rights, which is the freedom of expression. Students can gets suspended by just doing things the staff at the school does not like, including saying things that they don 't like or supporting a religion that the school does not support. Also, if something is said about the school or the people attending the school is said on social media that student can also get in a lot of trouble. Students should be able to have more first amendment
In the United States, free speech is protected by the First Amendment in which it states, “Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion … or abridging the freedom of speech.” Now, nearly 250 years into the future, the exact thing that the Founding Fathers were afraid of is starting to happen. Today, our freedom of speech is being threatened through different forces, such as the tyranny of the majority, the protection of the minority, and the stability of the society. Now, colleges and universities in the United States today are also trying to institute a code upon its students that would bar them from exercising their right to speak freely in the name of protecting minorities from getting bullied. This brings us into
College campuses have always been the sites where students can express their opinions without fear. There have been many debates about the merits of allowing free speech on campus. Some students and faculties support allowing free speech on campus, while others believe that colleges should restrict free speech to make the college’s environment safer for every student. Free speeches are endangered on college campuses because of trigger warning, increasing policing of free speech, and the hypersensitivity of college students.
Earlier this month in April, student protestors rioted at Berkley University because they did not want certain Conservative guest speakers to be able to give speeches at the university due to some of the speakers comments being inappropriate. According to the nonprofit organization committed to defending civil liberties named The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), "One worrisome trend undermining open discourse in the academy is the increased push by some students and faculty to 'disinvite' speakers with whom they disagree from campus appearances" (The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education). While the protesters were practicing their first amendment right to petition, the students were infringing upon the Conservative speakers freedom of speech which is unconstitutional. Just because the protesters may have disagreed with the speakers comments, does not mean that theys hould have prevented them from being able to express them. This is similar to the novel 1984 because the protestors controlled and censored what was able to be said at Berkeley University, just like how in the novel the Thought Police controlled what citizens said just because The Party disagreed with certain perspectives and didn’t want certain information to be
Would anybody want their freedom taken from them? Nobody would willingly give their freedom up. What’s the next thing thats going to happen, will schools having edible food. Hard to see, right? So are uniforms. Schools should not have uniforms for these three reasons: It takes the students freedom of expression away, it’s a bandaid reason to cover up violence, and some parents might not be able to afford the uniforms.
Something that grinds my gears would be, being asked rapid fire questions. I absolutely hate when I come home from school, and I’m instantly greeted at the door by being asked “how was your day?”, “do you have homework?”, “what did you do in school?”, “do you have golf tonight?” All within the time span of one minute. The reason I hate this so much is because I feel like i’m being interrogated, I am not a criminal I do not need to be questioned like one. My mom is usually the one who does this, and I always ask her to stop before I get too upset, but then she always ASKS “why?” which just makes the whole situtation go down hill. She is not a detective so therefore she does not need to interrogate me as if she was one. Yes, I know this is dramatic