Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The causes of peer pressure among teenagers
Cyberbullying in schools
Effects of peer pressure on teenagers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Grabber- We are all privileged to live in a free nation, where we can do what we desire. But, what if one day you were told that your school can monitor your every action on the interweb and can punish you for your online activities on and off campus? Well, certainly many students would protest without hesitating, for that they would no longer have privacy. Background- Well limiting a person’s speech online certainly isn’t a thought that just came out of the blue. It started as people, particularly young students, and their use of technology to freely share their thoughts on social media sites. And what became of it was more of bullying one’s peers online than just sharing one’s innocent opinion. But schools are meant to be a safe learning …show more content…
Paragraph #2 Baby Thesis: Schools should not be able to limit students’ online speech because cyberbullying is proven to not affect most students and teachers. Evidence (Concrete Detail): Be sure to cite your document.- According to Document B, out of the total number of British teachers surveyed about how cyberbullying had affected them, 38.6%, which is the highest percentage, said that they were not affected. Argument (Commentary): Connecting the evidence to the thesis- Based from the data in Document B, we can assume that if the highest percentage of the surveyed British teachers said they were not affected by cyberbullying, then other teachers in other nations and schools would most likely be the same. In addition, the effect of cyberbullying varies for different individuals. Therefore, what we can never assume is that everyone will be offended or take it seriously when they are cyberbullied. Paragraph #3 Baby Thesis: Schools should not limit students’ online speech because it is actually not that …show more content…
Well, based from both evidence from Document D and F, we can conclude that cyberbullying and its effect is just another form of bullying, but is just being exaggerated or, in other words, is made a bigger deal out of what it real is. In Document D, the fact that cyberbullying is not very disruptive is because a classroom discussion about a certain topic is very normal. It would not be a surprise if the topic of the principal's profile was discussed. Therefore, we can never conclude that a student’s speech online has triggered a disruption in the classroom
Schools have become more interested in limiting students rights because cyber bullying is becoming a huge problem these days .School officials and administrators are responsible to protect their student body and maintain a safe environment. They want to make sure their students are safe and happy at school and off -grounds.They want to limit online speech so they can protect students and teachers who get cyber bullied online.
On the other hand, students have the right to speak out for what they believe in without having any interference; they have the right to voice their opinion. This protection is all due to the first amendment protection. The first amendment protects the students and also the teachers’ freedom of speech, that includes during and out of school. With the protection of the first amendment no person is able to violate your right to freedom of speech. Any pers...
Cyberbullying has become a widespread problem. The more people have been using the internet, the more the number of cyberbullying incidents increase. According to document A, 25.1% of girls and 16.6% of boys reported being bullied in their lifetime. In addition to this, document A also
Benjamin Franklin once said, “Without freedom of thought, there can be no such thing as wisdom; and no such thing as public liberty, without freedom of speech.” Indeed, free speech is a large block upon which this nation was first constructed, and remains a hard staple of America today; and in few places is that freedom more often utilized than on a college campus. However, there are limitations to our constitutional liberties on campus and they, most frequently, manifest themselves in the form of free speech zones, hate speech and poor university policy. Most school codes are designed to protect students, protect educators and to promote a stable, non-disruptive and non-threatening learning environment. However, students’ verbal freedom becomes limited via “free speech zones.” Free Speech Zones are areas allocated for the purpose of free speech on campus. These zones bypass our constitutional right to freedom of speech by dictating where and when something can be said, but not what can be said.
Cyberbullying has become more of a problem over the past years. With technology being in such high demand and there being endless options. Students can use and abuse technology in a negative light. Since technology isn’t going anywhere cyberbullying will only worsen. The First Amendment rights along with the school’s handbook, student handbook and states policies and procedure are meant to protect students from such harm. A students’ rights and privacy must be protected with such things implemented and actions are taken cyberbullying can become
The problem is that cyberbullying is an act that must be stopped, but putting limits on students' online speech is unnecessary. If you are not familiar with the word cyberbullying, it is a is when an individual is tormented, threatened, harassed, humiliated, embarrassed or otherwise targeted by another individual using the Internet, interactive and digital technologies. But yet again I bring the point that schools should not limit the amount of students online speech. Schools must protect students’ First Amendment rights, but also maintain the learning environment and safety at school. Three main reasons why schools should not limit students online speech are there is not a large percentage affected, it does not cause a significant disruption, and it is a violation of constitutional rights.
In the United States, free speech is protected by the First Amendment in which it states, “Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion … or abridging the freedom of speech.” Now, nearly 250 years into the future, the exact thing that the Founding Fathers were afraid of is starting to happen. Today, our freedom of speech is being threatened through different forces, such as the tyranny of the majority, the protection of the minority, and the stability of the society. Now, colleges and universities in the United States today are also trying to institute a code upon its students that would bar them from exercising their right to speak freely in the name of protecting minorities from getting bullied. This brings us into
College campuses have always been the sites where students can express their opinions without fear. There have been many debates about the merits of allowing free speech on campus. Some students and faculties support allowing free speech on campus, while others believe that colleges should restrict free speech to make the college’s environment safer for every student. Free speeches are endangered on college campuses because of trigger warning, increasing policing of free speech, and the hypersensitivity of college students.
First of all, the freedom of speech is an amendment in the bill of rights, which means that it cannot be taken from us. In the preamble of the constitution, it states We the people in order to form a more perfect union, which means a country that is nearly perfect, that doesn't take away a persons right to talk freely. So, I believe that taking the students' freedom to speak freely should be punishable, because our forefathers clearly stated against it.
Censorship in schools can protect children and eliminate problems, but it can also cause many other problems. For one thing, it sometimes violates the First Amendment. The First Amendment states that “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (Taylor 15). These rights are guaranteed to all American citizens, and that includes schoolchildren as well. According to the Constitution, the government cannot take away these basic rights. Public schools are government funded, so they must be sure not to infringe on student’s rights or there could be a lawsuit on their hands. In addition to legal consequences, school is about learning and ...
The freedom to express one’s thoughts freely is greatly valued in today’s society. I am fortunate that I live in a time and place where I can exercise this right without any restrictions. The importance of this right is evident in the fact that it is the first amendment, freedom of speech. Over the decades, though, this right has accumulated some negative actions. As numerous people acknowledge this right, they tend to test its restrictions and often see how far they can go in terms of expressing their inner most opinions about others within the same society. Freedom of speech began as a contradiction of itself, where people weren’t allowed to express their opinion. It seems that as soon as people were fully allowed to exercise
Study methodology shows that higher rates of cyber bullying involvement (either perpetrator, victim or both bully and victim) are reported in situations of which participants are asked about being involved in specific behaviours related to cyber bullying rather than being asked explicitly if they have been involved in cyber bullying (Mishna, Khourg-Kassabri, Gadalla, & Daciuk, 2012).
Educators attempt to provide safe, nurturing environments where students can thrive. Any disturbance to this climate can have negative affects on students’ educational performances. Bullying is one such disruption. Unfortunately, physical and verbal abuse are nothing new in the school setting, however, the rise of technology in our country has created a new setting for bullies to target their victims. Cyberbulling, or the use of any number of technological means to harm or harass another, has become an increasingly prevalent occurrence, specifically among school-aged children (Campfield, 2006).
Freedom of Speech Should there be restrictions on freedom of speech? It is a natural right for people to say anything they want to say. There is no legal right to stop them or prevent them from saying what they want to say.
With technology progressing, students are moving past face to face hectoring, and are verbally bullying other through social media. Cyberbullying can sometimes become more harmful than verbal, physical, and emotional bullying due to victims, not feeling like they have an escape route because they are threatened repeatedly through text messages, e-mails, social media, etc. The worst part about cyberbullying is that the things posted can be anonymous; therefore, there is no blame for who posts what. A victim can suspect that someone is to blame for the actions done, but there is no proof to solve a possible ongoing issue. Cyberbullying and bullying are actually considered a crime when someone: physically assaults another person, gender or racism is talked about, violent or deadly threats are made, sexually texting, inappropriate photos, stalking,