Arguments Against Fascism

1756 Words4 Pages

Generally speaking fascism is an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. Fascism has been described in many ways and has many meanings for each different nation. For Fascist themselves, they look for the survival of their nation and the political priorities for their nation. Fascist were known as being anti-democratic, believing that representative governments were outdated and useless. . Fascist believe violence was the sure fire way to get work done or to basically solve any problem which goes with the principle, glorification of violence. There’s a phrase for most fascist that supports my claim before and that was “rise to the top”, which means glorified war, also meaning the best way for …show more content…

It was at a discordance with communism and socialism, they shared the same views. Fascism comes in a wide variety of forms of regime, but it is described as a regime of authoritarian. It is not communist, all fascism is rooted in extreme nationalism. Several countries embraced fascism between World War I and World War II. Some, such as Norway, Denmark, Great Britain, Belgium, and France, had immensely colossal fascist forms of kineticism. Others, such as Spain, Austria, Hungry, Rumania, Poland, and Finland, gained substantially fascist regimes. Fascism had the most sizably voluminous effect on Italy and Germany. The death toll due to fascism in Germany was the highest. It was the Holocaust in Germany that was the most paramount. Many countries had consequential losses of life due to the secret police and the unwanted ethnic groups. Other fascist countries had a diminutive death toll, and others did nothing of the kind of ethnic cleansing at all. Great Britain still had a fascist kineticism though, and a great fascist political party. The amount of censorship and racism in Great Britain was barely compared to Italy or German. Poland was scarcely a racist or censored country. Poland had a regime where the military ruled the people, and it had a fascist political party. Poland was a fascist country to a certain degree. Not all countries have to have an open, …show more content…

This was a fascist party that put great accentuation on the following of Spanish traditions. This group joined its militia with the militia of Francisco Franco in 1937, the organization was renamed Falange Española Traditionalist and was made the official party of the Nationalist state. Franco then ruled fascist Spain as a potentate in 1947. He surmounted rule from Primo de Rivera, who was ruler at that time. Franco was not a very oppressive bellwether but he did circumscribe the freedoms of his people. Under Franco’s rule there was diminutive liberation of verbalization, no liberation of the press, no right to voting, and even no liberation of religion, the only religion that was sanctioned was Catholic. These lacks of liberation were very fundamental for fascist rule. People in Spain did relish some freedoms though. They were able of own land and were sanctioned to peregrinate liberatingly throughout the country and leave the country if they wished to. Francisco Franco was in consummate control of Spain from the time he surmounted in 1939, to the time of his death on November 20, 1975. Fascism was then dissolved in Spain when Franco died. Franco decided to turn his role as ruler over to Don Juan Carlos afore he died. Carlos was of a ruling bloodline and Franco appointed him as his successor. With the avail of Adolfo Suarez, Don Juan Carlos

Open Document