Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How units have adapted over the years
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How units have adapted over the years
Have you ever watched a video that completely contradicted everything that you believed in? Me either, until after watching the document “Angry Inuk”. I although thought of myself as a good person: vegetarian, feminist, donated money to the homeless and starving, not buying leathers, furs, bone, etc. items, recycling, buying fair trade, but Alethea Arnaquq-Barill made it seem like I was the one out clubbing baby harp seals. Born in the capital city of Nunavut, Iqaluit, one of her first memories is going seal hunting. In the Inuit culture, seals provides them food and clothing for themselves as well as an income. It is a happy day when someone bring home a seal, calling out for a community dinner. But the anti-seal hunting groups have been on …show more content…
Which for the Inuit was fine, as they did not hunt harp seal pups as they had little meat to be much use. Yet their sails in furs drop drastically, causing them their great depression (pers. comm., A. Arnaquq-Barill, October 19, 2017). Even though the banned had an exception for the “tradition Inuit”, fur sales still dropped as no one was buying them. Thus after twenty-five years of partitioning, they were finally able to sell a unfinished seal skin for $100, making hunting a somewhat livable job option. The way they hunt seals is sustainable, ceritain more sustainable than the southerners (because everyone is south to them) way of factory farming meat. With seal being a healthy meat option, they use the fur to supply themselves, and as an economic source on the global market. Like when humans use to hunt for whales, the entire seal is used, and no parts gone to waste. From the job as the hunter, to the women who clean the skin and cook the meat. Then the children who uses the skin as sleds to break it in, and gives it to the seamstress to making clothing out of. One seal provides a full community worth of work and on a full stomach too
Marquise Lepage’s documentary, Martha of the North (2009) provides an insight to the 1953 forced relocation of the Inuit from Northern Quebec to the High Arctic. It does an exceptional job at explaining how the Inuit’s lives were affected and molded at a holistic perspective. Martha of the North (2009) can be explained through the concept of holism and its limitations. The concept of holism can explain the effects that the relocations has had on the Inuit people. Although the Inuit’s behaviour can be analyzed through the concept there are aspects of their experience that holism does not account for. The documentary follows the life of one of the first Inuit to be relocated, a woman named Martha, along with her family and the people in her community.
In the conclusion of “Bloody Ice,” the author makes the suggestion of ranching the seals. But how is that a better method to regulate the killing of seals? Ranching seals might come off as inhumane and cruel to somebody else. The author needs to define what is inhumane and cruel. The author states, “According to Oceans magazine, before the limit of 180,000 seals was established in 1950, the number of seals had dwindled from 3,300,000 to 125,000,000.” That is a large reduction in the number of seals dying. The author claims, ”Now, even with this allotment, the seals are being killed off at an almost greater rate than they can remultiply.” It doesn’t prove to the audience that with current regulations that their is a danger of the extension of seals.
It is apparent that over several centuries, Aboriginals have developed a close spiritual connection with the land. Unfortunately, Bill C-45 “…attacks the land base reserved for Indigenous people, removes protection for hundreds of waterways and weaken[s] Canada’s environmental laws” (Caven, 2014). In essence, this legislation sees the vulnerable waterways that Aboriginal individuals rely on furthermore, feel united with, and are left exposed to potential contamination. As such, they have become deeply in tune with the environment, thus truly...
Fur trading started between the Europeans along with the Aboriginals when the most valuable beaver pelts was a substituted for metal and clothing goods such as iron knives and axis, copper kettles, blankets and trinkets. The beaver pelts were well desired by the Europeans for the reason that using this fur for headgear provided an elegant way to keep dry. However these pelts were for fashion, as men and women could be instantly noted within the social hierarchy by according to their beaver hats. It was so valuable that the sand on the floor was filtered to save every hair that has fallen off. For the Europeans, captivating advantages of the rich furs from the Indians in the New World was a major factor in generating handsome profits, and there is no other pelt exchanging business enterprise like the Hudson's Bay Company. It is the oldest venture of Canada and it inspired many by its domination in the fur trading industry during its early years. They equipped their own armies, minted its own coins and even issued its own medals. The company had controlled fully one-third of present-day Canadian territory and were thought by many as a kingdom by itself in the fur industry. They had trading posts from the very north Arctic Ocean to Hawaii and as far south as San Francisco. HBC's revenue didn't generate simply from this one way trade in furs to Europe; it also consists of large amounts of European goods to North America. These goods incorporated many other products that local people cannot construct such as gunpowder, bullets, weapons, tobacco, kettles, pots, beads, fishing hooks, needles, scissors, and so much more. The Hudson's Bay Company showed a great measure of success since its formation, but it didn't come without s...
... In the debate over the ethics of whaling and its regulation since the formation of the IWC, widely diverse arguments have been made concerning the legitimacy of the whaling enterprise and the economic, ethical, and practical aspects of international regulation. Different views of ecology, culture, and legitimacy as they pertain to a valued resource and its exploitation for human purposes. While it is safe to say one must preserve the historical and cultural value of whaling nations and nations around the world, it can also be said of animals. While many nations continue to cling to their cultural ancestry, background of whaling, and the right for scientific research, it is proven that such human endeavors must be carefully and faithfully regulated.
Native Americans and the Environment. "The Makah Indian Tribe and Whaling" 98 Online. Internet. 3 Febuary 2003. Available: www.cnie.org/NAE/docs/makahfaq.html.
The Makah people indigenous to the Pacific Northwest have a very close and long standing cultural bond to the ocean. This cultural bond is displayed in various forms such as their artwork, history, and lore. One key aspect of their culture has come scrutiny within the past twenty years—whaling. Since 1855, the Makah people have legally held the right to whale in designated waters around their reservation. In the 1920’s, the Makah decided to halt whaling due to a dwindling population of the whales. In 1986, the International Whaling Commission enacted a global moratorium on commercial whaling with two exceptions being scientific research and aboriginal subsistence. In the mid 1990’s the Makah people decided to resume their whaling practices with rising whale populations and successfully killed their first whale in roughly 70 years in 1999. This has led to much backlash from domestic governmental agencies and NGOs alike. Thus the problem lies in the question as to whether the Makah people should legally be allowed to whale with the answer being a resounding no. There many issues domestic and international issues with the continuation of the Makah people whaling with the most important being: other previously whaling states seeing the United States ‘pardon’ cultural whaling and failing to see the importance of the global whaling moratorium in effect, the possible discovery of a small population of rare resident whales in the area, and the immorality of slaughtering a highly sentient being.
The cultural genocide that the Native Canadians have endured is truly immoral; it is understandable as to why they have gotten unique rights. The Native Canadians were the first to step foot into Canada and start a life in the barren land. It was unjust of the Europeans to confiscate the Natives from their main sp...
People should reduce fishing in Hawaii because the Monk Seal population is declining for the seals get entangled in the nets of the fishermen set out for other fish rather than the seals (Gravitz “Hawaiian Monk Seal”). Fishing is one reason that these wonderful seals are facing a decline in population. Fishing attracts seals who hope to get away with an easy meal. It is not everyday that seals get to feast on an amount of fish this gigantic. They venture close to the nets to capture stray fish. However, these seals sometimes find themselves trapped in the fishing nets. This leads to most of those seals getting killed off by the fishermen. Undoubtedly, fishing is one of the reasons that this beautiful seal is critically endangered, as well as starving.
In this essay I will going in depth with the fur trade and how it affected canada. The fur trade began as an adjunct to the fishing industry. Early in the 16th century fishermen from northwest Europe were taking rich catches of cod on the Grand Banks off Newfoundland and in the Gulf of St Lawrence (see History of Commercial Fisheries). Drying their fish onshore took several weeks, during which time good relations had to be maintained with Indigenous people, who were eager to obtain metal and cloth goods from the Europeans. What they had to offer in exchange were furs and fresh meat. The fishermen found an eager market in Europe for the furs and made high profits.
Aodla Freeman often describes her experiences without mentioning some of the powerful forces that affected the Inuit in the twentieth century such as government intervention or health crises. This memoir doesn’t act as a commentary on the changes affect Inuit communities in the twentieth century but this can cause some confusion as to what created the circumstances for some of these experiences. At some point during
The fur trade is a significant event in the history of Canada. History provides the clearest evidence of how a particular form of production - in this case animal furs- can influence not only the development of an economy, but a country’s social, cultural, and political organizations as well. In terms of knowledge about the fur trade, most of it is based on the perspective of the white fur traders who adventured to Canada to trap animals and conquer territory. It is important to understand the events of the fur trade, but in doing so it is equally imperative to look at the ways the Indigenous people contributed. Their perspective is often disregarded when looking at this historical event. From helping traders navigate
Most importantly, the Innuits only kill 10,000 seals and that too only adult seals. Also they hunt them, like a hunter would. In the letter, the native also stated, “We are skillful hunters who hunt adult animals for food that is not the same as bashing a pup, which can’t move, over the head.” The Natives hunt for survival, while the sealers hunt for a living, when their skills can be used in much more benefitting things. Lastly, relating to the purposelessness of this activity, the Seal Hunt does not profit much. On average, the Seal Hunt generates around $6.58-$8.7 million per annum. And this is considering that some of this money goes for more seal hunting or other problems in the fishing industry. Economist John Livernois conducted a study on the economics of the Seal Hunt, he stated that ending the hunt would save Canada $6.9 million per year. This is roughly how much money is spent by the Coast Guard on Icebreaker support ($4.7 million), by the Federal and Newfoundland government for lobbying and other support ($200,00), and by non-governmental organizations for anti-seal hunt organization ($2
Marine Harvest Canada builds a sustainable community which ensures our employees to live and work happily by supporting many other community organizations including service groups, sports teams, and social programs (“Supporting the Community”). As Aboriginal people is a very important part of Canada. Marine Harvest Canada’s employees comprise of one-fifth of aboriginal descent (“Aboriginal People and Marine Harvest Canada Working Together”). Marine Harvest Canada also collaborates First Nation community Kitasoo/Xai’xais, and processes 5,000 tonnes of salmon a year from local farms (“Aboriginal People and Marine Harvest Canada Working
Unlike the harpoon, however, the gun was not specially designed for seal hunting. Thus, when the Inuit acquired rifles from the Hudson’s Bay Company and started shooting seals, the bodies would sink before they could be harpooned and retrieved. Hunting efficiency plummeted dramatically; nineteen out of every twenty seals hunted with guns sank (Ehrlich 216). Before long, Inuit hunting began depleting seal populations. The introduction of small arms dealt a blow to both the Inuit community, whose hunting efficiency decreased, and their environment, which suffered a loss of mass numbers of animals.