Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare the short term and long term impacts of fur trade on native north america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Fur trading started between the Europeans along with the Aboriginals when the most valuable beaver pelts was a substituted for metal and clothing goods such as iron knives and axis, copper kettles, blankets and trinkets. The beaver pelts were well desired by the Europeans for the reason that using this fur for headgear provided an elegant way to keep dry. However these pelts were for fashion, as men and women could be instantly noted within the social hierarchy by according to their beaver hats. It was so valuable that the sand on the floor was filtered to save every hair that has fallen off. For the Europeans, captivating advantages of the rich furs from the Indians in the New World was a major factor in generating handsome profits, and there is no other pelt exchanging business enterprise like the Hudson's Bay Company. It is the oldest venture of Canada and it inspired many by its domination in the fur trading industry during its early years. They equipped their own armies, minted its own coins and even issued its own medals. The company had controlled fully one-third of present-day Canadian territory and were thought by many as a kingdom by itself in the fur industry. They had trading posts from the very north Arctic Ocean to Hawaii and as far south as San Francisco. HBC's revenue didn't generate simply from this one way trade in furs to Europe; it also consists of large amounts of European goods to North America. These goods incorporated many other products that local people cannot construct such as gunpowder, bullets, weapons, tobacco, kettles, pots, beads, fishing hooks, needles, scissors, and so much more. The Hudson's Bay Company showed a great measure of success since its formation, but it didn't come without s... ... middle of paper ... ...echi. Within two decades since their competition was formed, they had lost 78% of the fur trade business in Canada. The Bay started to see its deficit in the west and started its development closer to the Rockies during 1813-1820. The war for domination in trading furs broke out many battles of war; the Seven Oaks Incident of 1816 was the most memorable of all. It was the worst conflict and result no winner. In June 1819, the HBC captured numerous partners and men from NWC which ruined the Nor'westers reputation and their business that year. The NWC were worried about their company's future when major shareholders had different views on the business. The HBC at that time grew more profitable, attaining stronger revenues and reducing the Nor'westers business. The conflict between the two companies ended when HBC brought NWC through a merger in 1820.
Jennifer S.H. Brown, W.J. Eccles and Donald P. Heldman, The Fur Trade Revisited, Michigan State University Press, 1994.
As a final note, Catherine Cangany’s article really touched upon a unique and unexplored topic on local history in the Detroit region. Her article focuses on the production and development of moccasins from the first time European settlers traded with Native groups all the way through to the success of the moccasin in the 19th century. Her article could even be expanded to cover the moccasin to present day. Even today, as I write these words a pair of moccasins are keeping my feet warm. Her article demonstrates why moccasins are still produced and popular for their warmth and comfort today.
Kenneth Coates, author of Furs Along the Yukon: HC-Native Trade in the Yukon River Basin examines and explores the Fur Trade of the Yukon River Basin before the Klondike Gold rush in pursuit to analyze the early economic development of Yukon. Coates furthermore attempts to question the native-European exchange in one of the last regions of initial contact between aboriginal residents and Europeans in North America. It was believed that the miners and the Herschel Island whalers impacted the fur trade, varying the customary demands of the natives and transformed the native economy and HBC, and Americans, whom didn’t have significant impact of the structure and content of the fur trade. The Natives recognized their own necessity to trade and
Gorges noticed that a specific breed of fish, the cod fish, would be fished through the winter as much as any time after. He noticed the amount of revenue that this could bring in, since there were no “off seasons” for fishing cod. Gorges also saw a growing need to monetize on “his” ports off the only river that was accessible in New England. So he made way to profit and charge individuals parts of their catch on top of a monetary gain for setting sail to fish from the port. As much as Gorges port was growing, it was a success to those that knew of the port, which was limited only to immediately surrounding areas, and little worries of Newfoundland’s fisheries, who truly hadn’t noticed the new fishing expeditions. Work
Established in 1670 as ‘a highly dispersed organisation with headquarters in London and operations thousands of miles away in modern Canada’, the Hudson’s Bay Company was chartered by a “Company of Adventurers” to ‘trade furs along the shores of Hudson Bay and its large offshoot, James Bay.’ The Company quickly settled into a routine whereby its bay-side garrisons traded with Indians who travelled on canoes to trade their furs via rivers that broke up in the summer months. It was believed that the most cost-efficient way of bringing furs from the Cree, the most populous and home to numerous Aboriginal people in Canada, was not the lengthy canoe journey along the St. Lawrence, but the shorter route via ship from the Hudson Bay coasts. With this concept came the beginnings of the Hudson’s Bay Company. It remains today the longest continually operating company in North America. In the eighteenth century it was in the Company’s best interests to discover a northwest passage in order to improve their own trade and expand. Despite this goal to find the Northwest Passage, ‘little was accomplished’ until a hundred years after its charter, when ‘Samuel Hearne, a British explorer with the company, went overland as far west as the Coppermine River and demonstrated that there was no short passage to the western
As the settlement began to grow, Champlain moved on to new plans. He established the first permanent trading post on the site of Québec for the fur trade. Champlain gathered different fur trading companies under the organization of the Company of One Hundred Associates to open up the trading post.
Due to the escalation of the Fur Trade, both the French settlers and the First Nations shared strategies such as navigation, which ultimately set into motion the discovery and development of Canada today. When French settlers such as Jacques Cartier first arrived in New France, their knowledge was limited as to what they would encounter. Thanks to the kind gestures from First Nations such as Donnaconna, they were able to not only survive, but create a colony in the new land. The Fur Trade played a huge role in bringing together the French and the First Nations which started a newfound friendship. According to Foster, Eccles, and Foot (2012), the Fur Trade “opened the continent to exploration and settlement, financed missionary work, established
When the French arrived in the 1530’s and 1540’s they began trading seasonally for fur with the local natives as they dealt with fur, quickly creating strong ties between the two groups. As the French began traveling to the Americas they discovered they would return to France in the winter months traveling in heavy ships containing
The beaver fur was the most popular and the Indians’ knew how to find them. The Indians’ would trade the furs for tools made of metal. The British and the French wanted the furs for commercial trade, the fur pelts were very popular in other parts of the world. The French’s commercial fur trade was completely dependent on the Indians’. Eventually, the goods exchanged by the French for the furs were guns. The British traded alcohol for the beaver furs, which the Indians’ took a great liking to (Tignor, R., et al, (2002), pg. 485). While the beaver trade was plentiful, it served well for the British, the French, and the Indians’ The Indians’ loss of land and trading with the British and the French eventually leads to a cultural and lifestyle change for the
This benefited them as they were able to spread their religion throughout New France rapidly. Since the French had partnered up with the Ouendat and the Algonquian speaking First Nations, they had settled in the North. Luckily, they had access to thicker, rich-quality pelt, up in the North considering that the beavers had adapted from the cold weather. Fortunately, selling and claiming those rich-quality pelts had made the French receive a higher profit than usual. On the other hand, the First Nations still received ‘the usual’ and were not recognized for finding the rich-quality pelt that made the French wealthier. The Dutch and British however, received light pelts as the lived in the South. Overall, the French made a higher profit selling the thick, good-quality fur. Last but foremost, the fur trade consisted of many job opportunities. From portaging to treating people wounded from trading conflicts, the Fur trade had opened up new job opportunities to several future indentured servants and engages. Many people were getting hired as the demand for pelt became grew. Some of the jobs needed in the fur trade were missionary work, hunting and
Fur trade built a great relationship between natives and Europeans. Moreover, it also created alliances that were mutually beneficial. In winter, Europeans were unable to bring enough food for them. So they exchanged food from
The Canadian Fur Trade began when the French, new to the land, offered the natives of the land French goods such as kettles, knives, and other gifts, to create friendships; the natives gave the French fur pelts in exchange (Barbour 4). The fur trade “fostered the interchange of knowledge, technology, and material culture,” created a solid foundation for military alliances, and helped form new cultures and cultural identities (Foran 2). It was a way for the people of New France to keep alliances with the Aboriginal people against their common southern enemies, the British (Foran 22). The fur trade was the start of Canada and the life for people there, especially voyageurs. The fur trade shaped the economic, political, and social aspects of
As mentioned before, Indians relied on agriculture to survive, using bows and arrows to hunt wild animals and hooks to catch fish. According to the text, women tended crops and prepared then stored them into grass-woven baskets. Indians or different locations would trade with each other using wampum, Indian shell money, to gain valuable goods. For example, the Nacostins would trade their excess grain and meat for furs, copper, and bead jewelry. Consequently, the English settlers saw the Indian’s produce and wanted to trade other goods for food and furs. Thus, this lead to a successful trade between the Indians and Europeans, which would serve as a foundation for economic development in the District
Fur producing animals such as beavers, rabbits, sable, matten, and deer found in North America were used to produce fur and sold in European countries at quadrupled price. Not a lot of European traders were involved in trapping or hunting fur bearing animals, they bought the skin or furs from Indians and Native Americans that had hunted them in North America. In return for this trading activity Europeans introduced the Native Americans to alcohol, tobacco, guns, gunpowder, and other destructive goods that the Asians did not find attractive (Robert Strayer and Eric Nelson 2016). Hunting of these fur bearing animals lead to relocation and extinction these animals. Animals such as deer, beaver and many others moved deep into the forest to avoid being hunted. Fur prices varied with the weather, so during the cold seasons Europeans increased the prices of their fur. The disadvantage that came wit fur trade between the Europeans and Americans was that the American were exposed to the European diseases and they did not have access to medicine, the deaths that occurred from the diseases decrease the population of Native Americans (Robert Strayer and Eric Nelson 2016). Fur trade also led to the Native Americans to take advantage of the opportunity to rely more on European goods because they could not produce those goods. The Native Americans got along with the Europeans as some of them got
They traded fresh food for furs, especially beaver fur to make hats and other clothing.