Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction of the last of the mohicans
Introduction of the last of the mohicans
Introduction of the last of the mohicans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction of the last of the mohicans
The Last of the Mohicans was a movie directed by Michael Mann and produced Michael Mann with Hunt Lowry. This film was about the battle of Fort William Henry fought between the British and French armies and their allies the American Indians and the colonialist. The battle was fought during the French and Indian War, around 1757. The British and the French fought, so they could acquire land in the Americas and to provide wealth for their sovereign countries. The Indian tribe, the Huron’s, fought for the French Army. The colonialist fought for the British. The Mohicans’ tribe leader and his sons did not want to fight in the war but could not allow the innocent to be slaughtered, so they only attacked those hurting the innocent people. Each party …show more content…
that fought in the battle had their own reasons for fighting or participating in the battle of Fort William Henry.
In The Last of the Mohicans, the two remaining members of the American Indian tribe are Chingachgook, his son Uncas, and his adopted white brother Hawkeye. The American tribe was mostly killed off by the British and French fighting for the lands, so Chingachgook and his sons had to adapt to life among the colonists. When Magua, an Indian from the Huron’s tribe, agrees to escort a small British troop and the daughters of a British Colonel to Fort William Henry, they are ambushed by the Huron tribe, who some are working as traitors for the French army. Hawkeye, Chingachgook, and Unca come upon the raid and rescue the daughters and Major Heyward and see them safely to Fort William Henry. When they arrive at the Fort, it is under heavy attack by the French army. The Mohicans alert the fighting colonists of the Huron’s raiding their homes and killing their people. The Colonialists then learning of the raids on their homes, want to be relieved to go home to protect their families, but Colonel Munroe refuses. Hawkeye, despite the wrath he may endure from Colonel Munroe, helps the men leave the fort, to return home to their families. The battle at the …show more content…
fort continues and eventually the British fall to the French army. The French Colonel, Colonel Montcalm, agrees to allow the remaining British army, and the inhabitants to leave the fort unharmed. However, Magua attacks the British party outside the fort by permission of Colonel Montcalm, because Montcalm “does not wish to battle them again later on in the war” (Mann, Lowry, Mann, 1992). Magua wanted permission to attack the British army because he holds Colonel Monroe responsible for the death of his children, and wants to avenge the death of his children. He believes he can achieve this by killing Colonel Munroe daughters but only after ripping Colonel Munroe’s heart out and eating it. The Battle at Fort William Henry was a huge loss for the British against the French, it was also a turning point for the Huron Indian for achieving in killing Colonel Munroe. The movie shows many comparisons with the chapter readings of the course textbook. In the movie, the battle at Fort William Henry was fought in 1757 (Mann, Lowry, Mann, 1992), during the French and Indian War. The French and Indian War, which lasted from 1756-1763 (Tignor et al., 2002), took place between the British and French Armies because each army wanted control of the American Continents lands. The battle for Fort William Henry, a British asset, was a significant battle between these two major powers. The battles that took place between these two armies would displace indigenous societies from their lands. In order to survive, these Indians’ would become allies of the British and French armies. The Indians usually became allies of the army that laid claims to the same territories they laid claims to (history .com)The Indians’ were a valuable asset to the British and the French. They taught them to live off the land, and they traded with them. The war over the land was very hard on the Indians’. The Indians’ were displaced from their lands by the British in order to grow crops. Even though the land along the American coast and Northern America did not produce precious metals, the land did have rich soil, for growing crops. These crops consisted of sugarcane, cotton tobacco, indigo, and rice (Tignor, R., et al, (2002), pg. 479). As the popularity of the crops among the sovereign countries grew, trade for these commodities grew and population among the British grew, thus did the need for more farmland. The British and the French in the Northern part of America became more dependent on the Indians’, for fur trade.
The beaver fur was the most popular and the Indians’ knew how to find them. The Indians’ would trade the furs for tools made of metal. The British and the French wanted the furs for commercial trade, the fur pelts were very popular in other parts of the world. The French’s commercial fur trade was completely dependent on the Indians’. Eventually, the goods exchanged by the French for the furs were guns. The British traded alcohol for the beaver furs, which the Indians’ took a great liking to (Tignor, R., et al, (2002), pg. 485). While the beaver trade was plentiful, it served well for the British, the French, and the Indians’ The Indians’ loss of land and trading with the British and the French eventually leads to a cultural and lifestyle change for the
Indians’. The Last of the Mohicans was an enjoyable movie that keeps viewers captivated. The movie was an adaptation of a book by James Fenimore Cooper and made into a film in 1992 (Mann, Lowry, Mann, M. 1992). It is a timeless movie that could be watched many times over and be just as captivating. The Last of the Mohicans gives the viewers a glimpse into the social history of the lives of the American Indians and the struggles they had to endure in order to survive. In addition, it shows the political history between the British and French armies fighting for control of the American lands, for their sovereign countries.
The Muckleshoot are a Native American tribe are a part of the Coast Salish people. their territory can be found located in Washington. They are recognized as the Muckleshoot Tribe, they are composed of generations of different tribal groups who inherited Puget Sound areas and occupied river drainages from the rivers confluence in Auburn to their reservations in the Cascades.
Beginning in the mid sixteenth century, French explorers were able to establish a powerful and lasting presence in what is now the Northern United States and Canada. The explorers placed much emphasis on searching and colonizing the area surrounding the St. Lawrence River “which gave access to the Great Lakes and the heart of the continent”(Microsoft p?). They began exploring the area around 1540 and had early interactions with many of the Natives, which made communication easier for both peoples when the French returned nearly fifty years later. The French brought a new European desire for fur with them to America when they returned and began to trade with the Indians for furs in order to supply the European demands. The Natives and the French were required to interact with each other in order to make these trades possible, and, over time, the two groups developed a lasting alliance. However, the French began to face strong competition in the fur trading industry, which caused many problems between different European nations and different native tribes. Therefore, the trading of fur allowed early seven- teenth century French explorers to establish peaceful relations with the Natives, however, com- petitive trading also incited much quarreling between competing colonies and Indian tribes.
The French offered protection from neighboring enemies while the Indigenous people offered resources such as fur trade, and education of European settlers on how to use the land. In creating this mutual alliance, the differences between the two cultures of people led to a natural formation of gender and power relationships. To better understand the meaning of these gender and power relationships, we can look at Joan Scott’s definition. Scotts states that “Gender is a constitutive element of social relationships based on perceived differences between the sexes and gender is a primary way of signifying relationships of power (SCOTT, 1067).” By incorporating these two ideas from Scott, we can better understand the different perceptions of social relationships between the French and the Indigenous people and how the misunderstood conflicts created a hierarchy and struggle for
Jennifer S.H. Brown, W.J. Eccles and Donald P. Heldman, The Fur Trade Revisited, Michigan State University Press, 1994.
This book is complete with some facts, unfounded assumptions, explores Native American gifts to the World and gives that information credence that really happened yet was covered up and even lied about by Euro-centric historians who have never given the Indians credit for any great cultural achievement. From silver and money capitalism to piracy, slavery and the birth of corporations, the food revolution, agricultural technology, the culinary revolution, drugs, architecture and urban planning, our debt to the indigenous peoples of America is tremendous. With indigenous populations, mining the gold and silver made capitalism possible. Working in the mines and mints and in the plantations with the African slaves, they started the industrial revolution that then spread to Europe and around the world. They supplied the cotton, rubber, dyes, and related chemicals that fed this new system of production.
Michael Manns 1992 depiction of "The Last of the Mohicans" brings to light the resistance to British imperial ideologies and institutions during the French Indian war in 1757. These ideologies and institutions, as well as the resistance to them, is what led to the beginning of the imperial justification of the ideas of "manifest destiny", as well as "the white man 's burden". Those these concepts were only named in the beginning of the 19th century, the film portrays some of the reasons why these concepts came to be.
Fur trading started between the Europeans along with the Aboriginals when the most valuable beaver pelts were substituted for metal and clothing goods such as iron knives and axis, copper kettles, blankets and trinkets. The beaver pelts were well desired by the Europeans for the reason that using this fur for headgear provided an elegant way to keep dry. However these pelts were for fashion, as men and women could be instantly noted within the social hierarchy by according to their beaver hats. It was so valuable that the sand on the floor was filtered to save every hair that had fallen off. For the Europeans, captivating advantages of the rich furs from the Indians in the New World was a major factor in generating handsome profits, and there is no other pelt exchanging business enterprise like the Hudson's Bay Company.
Some more specific examples of how their lives were transformed include the Native’s new dependence to the Europeans for items such as rifles, kettles, tobacco, and many other goods, the European’s desire to convert the Natives, and the way that Native American warfare was transformed forever. Due to the European’s strong desire to obtain animal pelts and other goods, they were more than willing to trade rifles and commonplace kettles to the Natives in return for their help in acquiring these pelts. These goods that the Natives received transformed their life, but not entirely for the better. Prior to this engagement, they were an autonomous society that lived from the land. With the introduction of European goods, there was more and more dependency on these goods which, in the end, led to events such as King Philip’s War and the deterioration of the Native American way of life. An example of this dependency can be seen from Chomina during their time as Iroquois prisoners. He tells Laforgue, “It is you Normans, not the Iroquois, who have destroyed me, you with your greed, you who do not share what you have, who offer presents of muskets and cloth and knives to make us greedy as you are. And I have become as you, greedy for things. And that is why I am here and why we will die together” (BR, 165). These gifts of guns as well as the English and French seeking
Aboriginal women had occupied an essential position in the fur trade of the North American region from its birth during the 17th and 18th centuries. Even though this is true, the role of women, especially those of the Native American society, has been ignored a great deal in the entire history of fur trade. Contrary to the belief that the whole fur trade activity was only male-dominated, it very much depended upon Native women and their participation and labor in order to ensure survival as well as economic success. This paper will attempt to illuminate how Native women played the role as important producers when it comes to fur trade of the American Plains and, of course, the Canadian region. This paper will also deal with the two important company's namely the North West and Hudson's Bay Company and tell how each functioned during the time of fur trade. The term “fur traders” is the term often used to described anyone who was interested in the traffic of furs. The traditional picture has been that of a male in buckskin shirt and a raccoon cap, dispensing alcohol and trinkets to gullible savages, in turn for the quality furs worth 10 times their value.
The story was set during the French and Indian War, also known as the Seven Years’ War, a war between Great Britain and France, along with their Native American allies, that occurred from Virginia to Nova Scotia in the Spring of 1757. The names and dates of historic figures and battles were historically accurate and the information given about Monro and the French besiege at Fort William Henry was as well. Munro had asked for reinforcements from General Webb, who commanded the area from his base at Fort Edward, who did actually refuse to send further reinforcements, responding that he should negotiate the best terms possible which ultimately led to the parley. Some inaccuracies include death tolls and captivities.
The Powhatan were such a large group, they were known as the Powhatan Confederacy. The confederacy consisted of almost 14,000 Algonquian speaking people inside of thirty different tribes. The Powhatan confederacy was ruled by one person whom Helen Rountree refers to as mamanatowick or “Great Kinge.” Chief Powhatan had weroance who were in charge of individual tribes under his control. In English terms, a weroance means petty chief or commander. The weroance achieved their title through matrilineal kinship. Most all of them were sons of Powhatan. This paper provides insight on the impact the English settlers, called Tassantassas by the Native Americans meaning, “strangers or foreigners,” demonstrated on the Powhatan losing their land. The clash of these two completely different cultures led to the demise of the Powhatan confederacy. In due course, how the English were ordered by Queen Elizabeth I who established the Virginia Company, to colonize the Chesapeake area without regards to the hardships placed on the Powhatan. ...
The battle of Little Bighorn, also known as Custer’s last stand, was also a prime example of the cruelty towards the Native Americans. The battle of Little Bighorn took place in 1876 in Montana. The government was falling back on a treaty they signed with the Sioux and Cheyenne Tribes. They were already placed onto a reservation, but when gold was discovered on the reservation, Lieutenant Colonel George Armstrong Custer was sent to trap them and then wait for backup to force the Native American’s from the land. Custer disobeyed orders and attacked instead.
The two sides come to an agreement, Britain surrenders to France, and they are lead towards the Atlantic Ocean so that the British can be returned to England, “with pride”. On the route there they are ambushed by a very large band of Indians...
The Last of the Mohicans – The last members of the Native American Tribe, the Mohicans are caught in the middle of a battle between the French and the British after they rescue Colonel Monro’s two daughter from a group of Yuron Indians with a vendetta against Monro.
Most ranchers and settlers lost their lives they have many Indians whooping and shooting from the troop’s horse. There was evidence in Indian wars “ten men’s had died on the island and another 20 have been seriously wounded” (Doc H). Only a few of men died / wounded form Beecher Island. Another evidence is “let kill them, skin and sell until the buffalos are exterminated “(doc N). Nearly some Indians try to kill there buffalos (there resources) to have better clothes and tools to make. The Indians was responsible for the resources and there death that are wounded from the Indian war.