Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of motivation
Advantages and disadvantages of motivation
Motivation psychology quizlet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages and disadvantages of motivation
Application of Herzberg’s Theory at Bill’s Auto Repair & Service
There are many different factors that can affect behavior in an organization. Some of these are psychological in nature. According to Herzberg’s Motivation – Hygiene Theory psychological factors that motivate high productivity are related to job satisfaction. Managers can motivate employees by providing them with motivators that satisfy some sort of need. There are also many factors within an organization that can demotivate productivity. These factors include those that do not lead to satisfaction but rather dissatisfaction.
Psychological factors that motivate high productivity in an organization will be analyzed according to Herzberg’s Motivation – Hygiene Theory. Herzberg’s theory will be evaluated and applied to a study on the organizational culture characteristics of Bill’s Auto Repair, a local auto repair shop. Finally, it will scrutinize the dynamics behind these cultural characteristics that either motivate or demotivate high productivity in the workplace.
Organizational behavior can be affected by many different elements including social, economic, political and psychological. Employers are constantly trying to figure out the minds of their employees. Managers try to hire candidates who will be motivated, produce more and therefore become a competitive advantage for the organization.
Kreitner, (2010) describes the following:
Motivation - psychological processes that arouse and direct goal – directed behavior. Researchers have proposed two general categories of motivation theories to explain psychological processes underlying employee motivation : Content theories and Process theories. Conten...
... middle of paper ...
...ng Bill Knight keeps loyal motivated employees year after year. The retention rate at this establishment is 99%. This organization has many lifetime, loyal customers due to the friendly atmosphere and loyal employees. Whether Knight’s employees know it or not, these employees are motivated to higher production for many reasons other than just money.
References
American Business.Org. (n.d.). Herzberg's Two Factor Theory. Message posted to Herzberg's Two Factor Theory: http://american-business.org/827-herzbergs-two-factor-theory-of-motivation.htm l
Kreitner, R. (2010). Organizational Behavior (Ninth Edition Ed.). New York: McGrawl - Hill Irwin. (Original work published 1989)
Net MBA Business Knowledge Center. (n.d.). Herzberg's Motivation - Hygiene Theory. NetMBA.com Business Knowledge Center Web site: http://www.netmba.com/mgmt/ob/motivation/herzberg/
Robbins , Stephen P. and Judge, Timothy, A. Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Prentice Hall. Pearson Custom Publishing. 2008 Print
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2007). Organizational Behavior (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, United States of America: Pearson Prentise Hall.
He developed the motivation-hygiene theory to explain these results. He called the satisfiers motivators and the dissatisfiers hygiene factors, using the term "hygiene" in the sense that they are considered maintenance factors that are necessary to avoid dissatisfaction but that by themselves do not provide satisfaction. Herzberg reasoned that because the factors causing satisfaction are different from those causing dissatisfaction, the two feelings cannot simply be treated as opposites of one another. The opposite of satisfaction is not dissatisfaction, but rather, no satisfaction. Similarly, the opposite of dissatisfaction is no dissatisfaction. While at first glance this distinction between the two opposites may sound like a play on words, Herzberg argued that there are two distinct human needs portrayed. First, there are physiological needs that can be fulfilled by money, for example, to purchase food and shelter. Second, there is the psychological need to achieve and grow, and this need is fulfilled by activities that cause one to grow. The job should have sufficient challenge to utilize the full ability of the employee. Employees who demonstrate increasing levels of ability should be given increasing levels of responsibility. If a job cannot be designed to use an employee's full abilities, then the firm should consider automating the task or replacing the employee with one who has a lower level of skill. If a person cannot be fully utilized, then there will be a motivation
Following this, Lundberg et al (2009) outline motivation theories applied on employments and explain Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory of work motivation, ergo hygiene factors and growth needs (see Appendix 1; Herzberg, 1971; Herzberg, Mausner & Bloch Snyderman, 2005). Moreover, the authors argue that individual personalities influence work motivation (Wang & Erdheim, 2007) and offer criticism on Herzberg’s theory (Parson & Broadbride, 2006; Tietjen & Myers, 1998).
Employee Motivation: A Powerful New Model? Harvard Business Review. Latham G.P. and Pinder C.C. (2005). The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary'. Work Motivation Theory and Research at the Dawn of the Twenty-First Century.
According to Herzberg’s two factor theory, there exists ‘hygiene factors’, extrinsic factors of a workplace that lead to either dissatisfaction or non-dissatisfaction, but not motivation. As well, there are motivation factors, intrinsically rewarding factors of a workplace that “[emphasize] factors associated with the work itself or with outcomes directly derived from it”. In raising the salary of his employees, Dan hoped that the extrinsic reward of a pay increase would lead to intrinsically beneficial opportunities for personal growth for his employees. The opportunities for personal growth should in turn further motivate employees in their job. When Dan chose to raise the salaries of his employees, he was “influenced by research showing
Organizational productivity is a focused view of how input is processed to generate output at the most minimal resources timeously. In looking closely at attempting to achieve this, organizations need to build a strong culture and implement it. Management will need to make certain that employees identify with the values and norms of the organization hence the need to build a culture specific and representative of the demographics of the company; particularly in a multi-national company. Given all the aspects, the effects of corporate culture on productivity are still worthy of further research.
As with any theory, the motivator-hygiene theory has its share of criticisms. Among them is the lack of consideration for individual differences. Herzberg’s theory only takes into account internal organizational factors and does not consider personal attitudes and beliefs of one’s work. Moreover, the two-factor theory assumes that high job satisfaction equates to performance at work. This, however, does not hold true in many situations.(insert example) A highly satisfied, content, and happy worker is not necessarily the hardest worker in an organization.
Of the numerous speculations of work motivation, Herzberg's (1998) motivator hygiene theory has been a standout amongst the most persuasive in late decades. Essentially, the hypothesis isolates propelling variables into two classifications: Motivator factors, which have a remark with the work itself, and Hygiene factors, which have a remark with the encompassing
“It is therefore imperative for a company to understand the attitude of its workers and measure the job satisfaction of its employees, as job satisfaction is essential for productivity” (L. Bradshaw para. Therefore, the individual can still attain high job productivity without having the satisfaction in their field of work. This happens when money is just their motivation, or if they’re trying to receive a promotion. Others try to increase their productivity due to just the satisfaction they obtain from their work.
Rodgers, Robert, and John E. Hunter. "Impact of Management by Objectives on Organizational Productivity." Journal of Applied Psychology 76.2 (1991): 322-36. Print.
Robbins, S. P. and Judge, T. A. (2007) Organizational Behaviour. 12th Edition. USA: Pearson Education International Press.
Motivation is an important function in organizations to motivate their employees for their ability to perform well, improving their skills, increasing productivity, job satisfaction and employee extension. Employees also are not a machines that we could just program their task in their brain and they will do it automatically, they require motivation to actually do their job properly. And so, after discussing the process models of the Maslow’s “Hierarchy of needs”, Douglas McGregor theory X and Y, and also the Herzberg’s “two factor motivation hygiene theory.” understanding the ways of motivating people, the human nature, and the substance of nature. I believe that the true motivation can only come from within and also managers can actually motivate all of their employees.
Sachau, D. (2007). Resurrecting the Motivation-Hygiene Theory: Herzberg and the Positive Psychology Movement. Human Resource Development Review, 6(4), 377-393. Retrieved July 31, 2011, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1411469331).