Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Team leadership and successful teams
Relationship of culture in organisational performance
Team cohesion team leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Team leadership and successful teams
Chapter One
1.1 Introduction
The relationship between productivity and culture of an organization has been under a lot of scrutiny. Many researchers agree that it is important that organizations operate while completely conscious to their culture and how it is reciprocated in order to be productive.
Organizational productivity is a focused view of how input is processed to generate output at the most minimal resources timeously. In looking closely at attempting to achieve this, organizations need to build a strong culture and implement it. Management will need to make certain that employees identify with the values and norms of the organization hence the need to build a culture specific and representative of the demographics of the company; particularly in a multi-national company. Given all the aspects, the effects of corporate culture on productivity are still worthy of further research.
This chapter is an introduction to the central part of this
…show more content…
Problems in the company take too long to solve, resulting in authority being maintained centrally and poor time management and reduced output.
1.3 Background of the research
There was no research done in this particular title but with similar topics were investigated for example by Arnold Anderson called “how can job satisfaction impact employee productivity?” In his study he found out that employees tend to decrease organizational productivity through their dissatisfaction. It is management’s prerogative to give the employees room to grow and gain responsibility so as to feel as a part of the organization and become productive. Since for this reason, there is need to expatiate on the extent of impact organizational culture has on a company’s
The author Tracy Mullen states exactly what all ownerships, supervisors and managers spend time thinking about when it comes to their employee’s, how do we increase morale and productivity? Owning, running and even managing a productive organization is not an easy task to say the least. However to have a productive organization you must have productive employee’s and management staff. Organizational success it is required to implement managerial functions appropriately. How a company is structured can lead to overly productive employees or it can lead to employees whom are ineffective and not trust worthy of your organization. Companies are spending millions of dollars on researching how to hire, train and maintain great employee’s, the flip
Corporate culture and Organizational culture can be used interchangeably as they both emphasize on collective values, organizational outlook and acceptable approaches within an organization. However, corporate culture focuses more on acceptable methods, practices and procedures that lead to optimum profit in an organization . A company’s culture and style determine how efficiently an organization manages its diverse projects. In the case of Coronado Communications Inc., an existing strong organization culture deteriorated over the period of two years (2009 to 2011) as the company neither analyzed the consequences of bringing a change to the corporate system nor implemented proper reinforcements. Organization’s culture is molded by the common
Job satisfaction is an important issue to address within a work force because it ensures that the employees’ care and value is considered. If the company puts effort into making their employees happy with their work, then this will produce positive outcomes. This includes having more people wanting to work for the company, the employees will want to stay longer, increased productivity and the company will gain an exceptional reputation. When employee satisfaction is not addressed, the ...
Organizational culture is the system of shared beliefs and values that develops within an organization and guides the behavior of its members, while organizational structure is an expression of social and economic principles of hierarchy and specialization (Kinicki, 2015). Both the culture and the structure of an organization are important things for management to understand in order to successfully set and achieve an organization’s goals. Companies who excel in highly competitive fields can attribute their successful economic performance to a cohesive corporate culture that increases competitiveness and profitability. This culture is best utilized in an organization that has the necessary structure to allow its employees to coordinate their actions to achieve its goals.
Culture in the workplace can be the driving force for a business and can make or break a company when it comes down to it. Culture can be the reason one company does better than another or even survives for that matter. It is also important to understand the culture of a business to be able to thrive in the workplace environment. Think about what type of values, attitude, beliefs, and expectations you want to live by before you get a job somewhere at a business (“It’s All About Culture”2017). Is this the atmosphere you want to practically spend much of your life in? When we think about culture we think about different places of the world. Organizational culture is
When reading the book The Goal written by Eliyahu Goldratt, there were many lessons that I learned in order to have a clear and concise understanding of a positive level of productivity in a company. To have a positive level of productivity there are may components that are taken into consideration. Understanding what it actually means to be productive and how to increase the level of productivity by knowing the actual goal of the company that is trying to be reached and the components that go into the process of being productive. There are many factors that contribute to the level of productivity and being able to identify these factors is the key ingredient to having a successful level of productivity.
Chapter sixteen in our textbook highlights the benefits of organizational culture and what it can do for any company with a strong culture perspective. In fact chapter sixteen-three(a) speaks widely on how a strong culture perspective shapes any organization up well enough to perform better than any of its competitors who do not balance any organizational culture. If not mistaken after viewing SAS institute case they are well on track with facilitating a high performance organization culture. First, SAS institute motivate all employees to become goal alignment in their field of work. This is where they all share the common goal to get their work done. In one of the excerpts taken away from this case, an employee- friendly benefits summary expresses the statement “If you treat employees as if they make a difference to the company, they will make a difference to the company.” “SAS Institute’s founders set out to create the kind of workplace where employees would enjoy spending time. And even though the workforce continues to grow year after year, it’s still the kind of place where people enjoy working.” Clearly highlighted from this statement that SAS Institute is mainly ran off of a fit perspective. Which argues that a culture is only as good as it fits the industry. Allowing a good blueprint or set up will
Culture can be defined as “A pattern of basic assumptions invented, discovered or developed by a given group as it learns to cope with its problems of external adaptation and internal integration that has worked well enough to be considered valid, and therefore to be taught to the new members as the correct way to perceive, think and feel in relation to those problems”. Schein (1988). Organizational culture can be defined as a system of shared beliefs and values that develops within an organization and guides the behavior of its members. It includes routine behaviors, norms, dominant values, and feelings or climates. The purpose and function of this culture is to help foster internal integration, bring staff members from all levels of the organization closer together, and enhance their performance.
It is increasingly clear that media and culture today are of central importance to the maintenance and reproduction of contemporary societies. Cultures expose society to different personalities, provide models, which display various forms of societal life and cultivate various ways to introduce people into dominant forms of thought and action. These are the types of activities integrate people into society and create our public sphere. Media and technology surround our society; engrained into the fabric of our existence so much so, that it has become hard to find an aspect of life not influenced by its effects. For this reason, media controllers, wield extreme power and influence over the lives of everyday people. Although, they increasingly continue to feed the audience trash, despite their authority as the creator of our social/cultural interactions, and justify their actions by calling themselves industries. Reducing themselves to just businesses whose sole purpose is to create a profit. This admittance of what they feel to be their true purpose however does not hinder their control and power but instead adds to it. Creating a need for there to be some way to analyze and discuss whether they are using their position and power wisely. Filling this void, scholars have theorized ways for individuals to be critical of the media that they intake. One of these critical theories is the “Culture Industry” theory. Using Cultural Theory, as well as other complementary neo Marxist theories, it is possible to determine how Stacy Peralta, once urban youth culture advocate, became incorporated into the superstructure through media use, thus making him a tool for the continued commoditization of society, and a youth marketer for industries l...
A strong organisational culture leads to higher organisational performance. Organisational culture can be defined as a total function of common beliefs, values, patterns of behaviour that are held and shared by the members of an organisation. It is also a valuable resource which can improve the competitiveness of a company and is used to distinguish the company (Barney 1986). From the 1970's the study of organisational culture has become an important issue and closely studied in the early 1980s. Since then, organisational culture has turned out to be one of the most important factors which affects the overall performance of a company.
Organizations that have a cultural that is working within the organization can build off of that positive energy. The cultural of an organization is built from the employees (including managers) and as more of the employees start to feel the same way the culture begins. This is also true in terms of a negative culture. If the employees are not in sync with the managers, other employees and the overall mission of the organization that can mean a slowdown in production. A powerful concept noted by Eide and Allen (2012) is that to have a positive reform leadership involvement is required and without it, change will be difficult.
“It is therefore imperative for a company to understand the attitude of its workers and measure the job satisfaction of its employees, as job satisfaction is essential for productivity” (L. Bradshaw para. Therefore, the individual can still attain high job productivity without having the satisfaction in their field of work. This happens when money is just their motivation, or if they’re trying to receive a promotion. Others try to increase their productivity due to just the satisfaction they obtain from their work.
The concept of organizational culture is one of the most debated topics for researchers and theorists. There is no one accepted definition of culture. People even said that it is hard to define culture and even more change it. It is considered a complex part of an organization although many have believed that culture influences employee behavior and organizational effectiveness (Kilmann, Saxton, & Serpa 1985; Marcoulides & Heck, 1993; Schein, 1985a, 1990).
Rodgers, Robert, and John E. Hunter. "Impact of Management by Objectives on Organizational Productivity." Journal of Applied Psychology 76.2 (1991): 322-36. Print.
The fact is employee productivity can make or break a firm, and a firm staffed with underperforming employees will inevitably fail regardless of the amount invested into business development. Many firms that do recognize the importance of employee productivity often invest in improving the corporate culture, but overlook investing in the right tools that result in increased productivity.