SAS Institute Case Study: Case Analysis Of Sas Institute

1112 Words3 Pages

After reviewing the case analysis of SAS Institute, it is clear to see that they are well organized company. SAS Institute is design with a well put together cultural background. They distribute great employee motivation amongst their company, willingly to create a happy work place for all employees. Quickly into overviewing this case analysis, I was able to see multiple times they offer great attributes to any member apart of their organization. This allows employees to come to an understanding that their job of just working means much more than clocking in and out every day. Throughout the case there is multiple times were we readers are first introduced to chief executive officer/ founder of the company Jim Goodnight. Mr. Goodnight not being …show more content…

Chapter sixteen in our textbook highlights the benefits of organizational culture and what it can do for any company with a strong culture perspective. In fact chapter sixteen-three(a) speaks widely on how a strong culture perspective shapes any organization up well enough to perform better than any of its competitors who do not balance any organizational culture. If not mistaken after viewing SAS institute case they are well on track with facilitating a high performance organization culture. First, SAS institute motivate all employees to become goal alignment in their field of work. This is where they all share the common goal to get their work done. In one of the excerpts taken away from this case, an employee- friendly benefits summary expresses the statement “If you treat employees as if they make a difference to the company, they will make a difference to the company.” “SAS Institute’s founders set out to create the kind of workplace where employees would enjoy spending time. And even though the workforce continues to grow year after year, it’s still the kind of place where people enjoy working.” Clearly highlighted from this statement that SAS Institute is mainly ran off of a fit perspective. Which argues that a culture is only as good as it fits the industry. Allowing a good blueprint or set up will …show more content…

When expressed by one employee at SAS Institute “I started three weeks ago in the Publications Department … I never imagined that I would have a job where I look forward to coming to work in the morning and forget to check the clock in the afternoon to see when it is time to leave. I work with a charismatic manager and my team is full of creative and hardworking individuals who have done their utmost to make me feel welcome. As a Liberal Arts Manager (from UNC even), I didn’t envision a software company as the “ultimate job” but then I guess I didn’t know enough about SAS. You have a wonderful company and I am thrilled to be here. Thank you.” It is clear that both key components of culture and motivation is collaborated in ones work style at SAS. Identified from Chapter five in our textbook we conclude that motivation at the workplace is a beneficial behavior to one’s work focus. Viewed in the case study we can see SAS Institute is primarily based of internal needs more so external incentives as a source of motivation. For example internal needs suggest that managers who are more supportive and less controlling tends to get more of an intrinsic motivation out of their employees at work. This representation is similar to SAS’s work style, simply because while founder Jim Goodnight wants less of his workers being motivated with external incentives such as money. He mostly

Open Document