Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of dred scott case
Slavery in the antebellum period
Slavery in the antebellum period
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of dred scott case
Antebellum South was a critical point in the history of the United States of America. It included many economic improvements, governmental issues and positions, and an almost completely different way of life from the other half of the country. The term “antebellum” means of or during the period before a war. In this case, Antebellum South, meaning before the American Civil War. Some historians say this period started after the War of 1812, leading up to the Civil War, and others expand it to the years from the ratification of the Constitution to the war.
The history of the Southern United States dates back to hundreds of years ago. In 1781, at the Siege of Yorktown, the American Revolution was ended. The Constitutional Convention, in 1787,
…show more content…
ended with delegates creating a system of checks and balances with three different branches of government: the Legislative, Judicial, and Executive. This was the time when the South became a monumental bureaucratic force with the development of the United States. The South thought they had political stability with the approval of the Articles of Confederation. The two-thirds clause for the ratification of treaties allowed the South a preeminent voice in those matters and the attempts to disregard navigation of the Mississippi River. The Confederation was unable to maintain economic growth, and thus the United States Constitution was forced to be written. In order to understand the economy and life of the South, it is best to understand and learn about the same things in the North in order to compare and think about the similarities and differences between the two parts of the United States. The North was an industrial, agricultural, and economic franchise. It had a greater percentage of middle class people. The North was largely dependent on farming, but not in the way the South was. It was easier to grow crops and the farmers could switch their crops every year without trouble. Farmers were investing in steel plows and mechanical reapers, reducing the labor time required in planting and harvesting. Women were hard workers and usually started working from a young age and earned money. A boom in the development of the North was established because many roadways, canals, and railroads were constructed. The North was essentially more developed and is closer to what we believe and do in the United States in today’s society and economy. The South was known for agriculture and slaves.
It mainly consisted of upper class wealthy people. The people who were in the lower class were essentially unseen and their opinions did not matter in the lives of the Southern people. Rich, white men owned slaves and had many acres of farmland to grow either tobacco or cotton. In 1794, Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin. It was a machine that boosted the process of removing seeds from cotton fiber. Because of the high demand and profit from cotton, owners would buy more acres of land to grow more cotton on, meaning there was a greater demand for slaves.
Slave life in the South was a harsh concept. A typical plantation had, on average, 20 slaves. The total number of slaves in the Antebellum South was 3,953,696. The states with less than 30% slaves were: Delaware, Maryland, Texas, Arkansas, Missouri, Tennessee, and Kentucky. States that contained more than 30% slaves were: North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana. Work on the plantation was never-ending. Male slaves tended the fields, pastures, and gardens. Females and children served as cooks, servants, and housemaids. They were often starved, whipped, or even
…show more content…
raped. Southern white women were put on a pedestal. Many of these women were ardent advocates of slavery. Southern plantation mistresses were portrayed as the ultimate housewife because they were free of manual labor and aimed to focus on their children and husbands. They were meant to “look away” at affairs husbands would sneak out into the night and have with black slave women. Slaves in the South would resist enslavement throught many forms of resistance, such as working slowly, damaging equipment, and even keeping alive their religion and culture beliefs.
One of the most ruthless rebellions occured in 1829 when Nat Turner organized a rebellion in Virginia. Close to 60 white people were killed, and the state later executed 5 slaves who were accused of being a part of the rebellion.
In 1847, a speculative case was brought before the United States Supreme Court. A black slave named Dred Scott was travelling with his owner, Dr. John Emerson, who took Scott to the free state of Illinois. Scott was unaware of his rights during his extended stay in the free state, and did not make a lega claim for freedom until he was back in Southern territory. Dred Scott went to trial, but lost because he was black, he was not a citizen, and had no right to sue. The Dred Scott Decision is named one of the most infamous cases in
history. The abolitionist movement in the United States primarily started with the agitation of black abolitionists and the urgency among white abolitionists that feared maintaining slavery in this country would lead to even more violence. A revivalism called the Second Great Awakening inspired people to have reforms that included right for women, educational improvements, and the abolition of slavery. In 1860, Abraham Lincoln ran for president and believed that people who owned slaves were “just a product of the environment.” In 1863, Lincoln wrote his Emancipation Proclamation and pleasurably won over most of the influential abolitionists, including William Lloyd Garrison who had called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell.” The Thirteenth Amendment outlawed slavery. The economic, social, religious, technological, and political movements of the period of the Antebellum South had an enlightened effect in the course of the history of America, including the abolition of slavery, westward expansion, and movements of all sorts.
In “Antebellum Southern Exceptionalism: A New Look at an Old Question” James McPherson argues that the North and the South are two very different parts of the country in which have different ideologies, interests, and values. Mcpherson writes this to show the differences between the north and the south. He gives perspectives from other historians to show how the differently the differences were viewed. These differences included the north being more industrialized while the south was more agricultural. He gives evidence to how the differences between the north and south came together as the south produced tobacoo, rice, sugar and cotton, which was then sent to the north to be made into clothing or other fabrics. Mcpherson analyzes the differences
2) Was there any degree of autonomy in the lives of enslaved women in the revolutionary or antebellum America? Use the documents to address the question of whether or not an enslaved woman could protect the humanity and if so, explore how this might be achieved. Also include how the specific era (revolutionary or antebellum) affected her autonomy.
Being a slave in the North and South were very different. The Northern states had factories and small farms, so most of the slave did house work. The Southern states had big plantations and needed slaves to pick the cotton so their masters can make their
In 1846, African slave Dred Scott sued for his freedom on the grounds that he resided in the free states of Illinois and the Wisconsin/Minnesota territory to serve his owner. In 1854, Scott appealed his case to the Supreme Court, seeking to reverse the District court’s decision declaring him still a slave. In 1856, the case began, however the freedom of Dred Scott was not the only issue the court addressed, they also had to decide can blacks be citizens, the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, and can Congress prohibit slavery in federal territories. A year later the Supreme Court handed down its decision, “they dismissed the case of due to lack of
The reason why Dred Scott decided to pursue his freedom is unknown, but there are a couple theories. For example, it is believed that “most likely, Scott decided to bring his case to court after years of [talks] with other slaves that had done the same.” (Herda, 30) This shows that, Scott was not an ignorant, uninformed man and had reason to believe he could obtain freedom for himself and his family. This also shows that he took a long look at the issue before making the decision to sue for his freedom. In addition, he may have also been convinced by “several talks with his old friends, the Blows, who were sympathetic to his troubles.” (Herda, 30) This shows that his previous owners, turned friends, the Blows, may have been a major influence; being Scott’s staunch supporters throughout his life. This also shows that the Blows encouragement, on top of other slave’s actions, may have been what finally convinced Scott to pursue the suit for his freedom. In conclusion, several factors convinced Scott to sue for his freedom including the opinion of his previous owners, the Blows. 188
The Dred Scott decision involved two slaves, Dred Scott and his wife, who originated from one of the recognized slave states, Missouri, but they were relocated to settle in Wisconsin, a state where slavery was prohibited. In 1846, Scott filed a lawsuit and “sued for his freedom on the grounds that his residence in a free state and a free territory had made him free.” In 1854, Scott’s “case ultimately went to the Supreme Court.” By landing in the Supreme Court, the justices ruled seven to two against the Dred Scott and his wife for multiple reasons. One main reason that the court specified was that whether African Americans are enslaved or not, they were never recognized as citizens of the United States. Therefore, the justices believed that the case should not have been heard or discussed in the Supreme Court to begin with. The second reason was that regardless of any African American being transferred to a free state, does not necessarily change their social status. Thirdly, the Supreme Court ruled that the Missouri Compromise of 1820, a compromise that outlawed slavery north of the 36˚30’ latitude line, is unconstitutional because the Congress declared that they had “no power to ban slavery from any territory.” The decision was critical due to increasing the North population’s unease, and their concern that the South will begin to transport slaves to freed states, which will
Dred Scott v. Stanford was the most fundamental case in American history dealing with the rights of African Americans. This case tested the Missouri Compromise and challenged the issues of slavery and national citizenship. Dred Scott was a slave owned by Dr. John Emerson, who constantly traveled in and out of free and slave states with Scott. Originally Emerson had Scott in Missouri, a slave state, and then moved over to Illinois, a free state, and lastly to Wisconsin territory, also free. While in the Wisconsin territory, Scott married and had two daughters, which was unique due to the fact that slaves in the south were prohibited from being married legally, further validating Scott's implicit freedom. Eventually Emerson moves Scott and his
Dred Scott was born as a slave in Virginia. As a young man he was taken to Missouri, where he was later sold to Dr. John Emerson. A military surgeon, Dr. John Emerson moved Scott a US Army Post in the free state of Illinois. Several years later Dr. Emerson moved once again, but this time to the Wisconsin Territory. As part of the massive Louisiana Purchase the Wisconsin Territory under the Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery. While in the Wisconsin Territory and also later in St. Louis the Emersons started to rent the Scotts out as servants. Under several state and federal laws this was an illegal act in direct violation of the Missouri Compromise, the Northwest Ordinance, and the Wisconsin Enabling Act. Scott bounced around from several military posts including one in Louisiana before ending up again in St. Louis, Missouri. After the death of Dr. Emerson, ownership of the Scotts reverted to his wife. Through out 1846 Scott tried several times to by the freedom for him and his family. After several failed attempts he resorted to the legal r...
questions arise: 1st.[sic] Was [Scott], together with his family, free in Missouri by reason of his stay in the territory of the United States hereinbefore mentioned? And 2d[sic], If they were not, is Scott himself free by reason of his removal to Rock Island, in the state of Illinois...?" Both of these questions led to an even greater and more central question: "Can a negro, whose ancestors were imported into this country, and sold as slaves, become a member of the political community formed and brought into existence by the Constitution of the United States, and as such become entitled to all the rights, and priveledges, and immunities, guarantied by that instrument to the citizen?" (i.e. does Scott, having been a slave, have the constitutional right to sue?)
The reason why slavery spread into the cotton kingdom after revolution is because the tobacco income plummeted as white setters from Virginia and Carolinas forcing the original Native Americans inhabitants farther and farther west where they established plantations. The wide spread use of the cotton gin invented by Eli Whitney in 1793, made these cotton plantations more efficient and profitable. Around 1820, slavery was concentrated in tobacco growing areas of Virginia, Kentucky along coastal region of South Carolina and Northern Georgia and in 1860s it spread deep in the South (Alabama, Texas, Louisiana) following the spread of cotton.
The Antebellum Period in American history is the time period that directly follows the end of the War of 1812 in 1814 up until the beginning of the Civil War in 1861. This time period got it’s name from the Latin word “Antebellum,” which means, “before the war.” The Civil War is such an iconic turning point in American History. The Antebellum Period played a large role leading towards the division of North and South and contributed to making the Civil War almost
Dred Scott was a slave. His master was an army surgeon who was based in Missouri. In the early 1830's and 1840's his master and him traveled to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory. It was in 1846 that Scott sued his master's widow for freedom. His argument was that the state of ...
The Antebellum Period of the United States was a time pre dating the Civil War; it encompassed the years from 1781 to 1860. This time period is known for its rise of abolition and gradual polarization of the country between abolitionists and supporters of slavery. This subject of slavery was made taboo in the chambers of the government due to the fact that the Congress could not agree on the subject. The North and South were unique from each other in many things, for example the main point surrounding slavery. While they did have a fair amount of similarities between them it is still reasonable to conclude that by the 1860’s they had developed into two separate and distinct societies.
Before the start of the Civil War, there were around 3.5 million slaves laboring in the American South. The majority of the slaves working in the South were field workers on large plantations. Slaves held jobs in other areas but the working and living conditions on average tended not to be as severe as it was for the plantation slave. Enslaved people on plantations had harsh conditions in their work and home lives as well as being sold, which was always a continuous nagging fear.
By 1860, nearly 3,950,528 slaves resided in the United States (1860 census). Contrary to popular belief, not all slaves worked in hot and humid fields. Some slaves worked as skilled laborers in cities or towns. The slaves belonged to different social or slave classes depending on their location. The treatment of the slaves was also a variable that changed greatly, depending on the following locations: city, town or rural. Although all slaves were products of racial views, their living conditions, education, and exposure to ideas differed greatly depending on their social classes and if they lived in a rural or urban setting.