Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Australian identity and culture essay
Australian identity and culture essay
White australia a racist policy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Uyen Loewald’s poem deals with the issue of immigrants feeling less-than the majority and the image of the ‘model minority’; migrants who are obedient to the ideals and expectations of the dominant culture.
Uyen Loewald was born in Vietnam during the 1940’s. She married an American diplomat, Klaus Loewald and moved to the U.S. She then migrated to Australia in 1970. This was not the best time to be an immigrant of a non-Caucasian background. This is because during this time the White Australia Policy which intentionally favoured immigrants from certain European countries-mostly form Britiain- was still being progressively demolished. This means that the racial tension between Australians and other minority groups would be extremely tense.
…show more content…
This means as Loewald was a woman of an Asian background being in Austrlia at that time would be very difficult; in the poem ‘Be good,little migrants’ the reader how can see how much this experience influenced her in her writing. Loewald’s poem ‘Be good, little migrants’ deals with themes of migration, acceptance, multi-culturalism and stereotypes/generalisations. This poem can also be seen as a call to action poem. It is pointing out the flaws that are present in society in terms of immigration in a heavily sarcastic manner. It is showing that society thinks that immigrants should assimilate to their culture but also know their place; doing menial jobs that are not fit for ‘regular society’ to do. Give us your faithful service sweep factories, clean mansions prepare cheap exotic food Repetition plays a major part in this poem as it adds to the patronising tone.
Spoken from the patronising viewpoint of assumed Australian superiority The speaker describes the migrants as ‘little’ and repeats the instruction to ‘be good’. The repetition of ‘be good’ enforces the idea that immigrants are seen as unimportant and should be quietly useful and obedient in their new country. The use of ‘Little’ migrants infantilizes them making them appear as children with the speaker being an adult. This goes hand in hand with the idea of white superiority and the belief that whites are more superior- hence the term “little migrants”- to people of other racial backgrounds. In this poem the speaker sees migrants’ culture as ‘low arts’ and the expectation that migrants must be grateful and conform to the dominant culture is mocked by the poem’s extremely sarcastic tone. Loewald lets us see what stereotyping places on people and the struggle that migrants endure to gain respect and treated as an equal in Australian society. The line ‘you’ll reach excellence; just waste a few generations’, can allude to the Stolen Generation. This line can also be interpreted as the frustration and despair felt by migrants who know that their full potential cannot be realised until their descendants since they would be ‘properly assimilated’ to the culture and can be seen as more ’true
blue’.
Observing this, I will look at how race is socially produced and the persistence of colonial oppression throughout history. Then, I will look at this resonates with the concept of racialization and belonging. Finally, I will analyse Tuyen’s lubaio as a space where the city of Toronto becomes witness to a site of resistance. In conclusion, I suggest that Tuyen’s lubaio does in fact represent racialization and resistance, yet whether or not I could be effectively interpreted in its intended way through the colonial gaze is ultimately questionable.
The only thing the new immigrants had in common with each other was the dream of becoming rich and the poverty of their current state. Unfortunately, so many different people with so little in common often left tension between different groups on the edge of becoming violent outbreaks. The famous Tammany set the example early on of how to broaden it's ow...
The poem “We’re not trucking around” by Samuel Wagan Watson presents an Aboriginal perspective on Australian National identity, showing the audience that Australians still mistreat Indigenous people, expressing his perspective through the ideas that white men still mistreat Aboriginals and the marginalization of Aboriginal culture. Watson reinforces his idea through poetic and language
The lines, “As I said, it might help if we … we can imagine it’s opposite” use perspective to put the non-indigenous Australians into the shoes of indigenous Australians, to help them explore and understand the possibilities of not belonging.
Nan Dear, the matriarch of the family, is challenged and is subsequently forced to reflect on her past experience with white Australians. In the past, Nan Dear experience the Stolen generation, ‘they forced us to leave. Forced us to leave Cummeragunja. Our home.’ The inclusive pronoun ‘us’ places herself amongst other children who were taken away from their home.
Have you ever felt like you didn’t belong somewhere? Do you know what it feels like to be told you don’t belong in the place of your birth? People experience this quite frequently, because they may not be the stereotypical American citizen, and are told and convinced they don’t belong in the only place they see as home. In Gloria Anzaldúa’s “How to Tame a Wild Tongue”, Anzaldúa gives the reader an inside look at the struggles of an American citizen who experiences this in their life, due to their heritage. She uses rhetorical appeals to help get her messages across on the subliminal level and show her perspective’s importance. These rhetorical appeals deal with the emotion, logic and credibility of the statements made by the author. Anzaldúa
There have been many unanswered questions in Australia about Aboriginal history. One of these is which government policy towards indigenous people has had the largest impact on Indigenous Australians? Through research the Assimilation Policy had the largest impact upon Indigenous Australians and the three supporting arguments to prove this are the Aborigines losing their rights to freedom, Aboriginal children being removed from their families, and finally the loss of aboriginality.
Migrants who appeared physically different or who were English illiterate were discriminated from the community, which was enforced by the White Australian Policy. “She’s got no right being in this country in the first place… Who let you into the country?”, from page 250-251, suggests that Francesca, an Italian migrant, was not welcomed and demonstrates the disrespect that migrants were being treated with. Eaton highlights the uninviting nature of who were rude out of the fear of the threat implied by the White Australian Policy. Additionally, Francesca is abused due to her inability to “speak English”, from page 251 of Fireshadow. Thus, displays the verbal abuse and humiliation from the ignorance of Albino Australians – who are intolerant when dealing with migrants. Walwicz further expresses this perspective on how Australians are “not very friendly” and “never accept” migrants– positioning the readers to sympathise with migrants who are segregated from society. Ania uses high modality to enforce the guilt she is attempting to portray, which is further increased by the repletion of personal pronouns. However, this poem silences the Albino Australians as they are not given a perspective on the poem. The alienation that migrants are constantly faced with leads to the victimisation through verbal and physical
My essay focuses on discrimination as one of the main challenges that refugees face. I discuss some instances of discrimination that occurred in the book, whether based on race or culture,
The “new” immigrants came over hungry for work and were willing to work for a fraction of what the “old” immigrants would. The “new” immigrants came in unskilled and unaccustomed to American society, took the “old” immigrants jobs and shook up their neighborhoods; this created much tension between the two groups. Riis like others, hated some ethnic groups more than others, and in How the Other Half Lives establishes a general hierarchy placing the “old” immigrants on the top, groups such as Germans, Irish and the English. In the middle Riis ranks the Italians, Jews, and blacks. On the bottom of the ladder Riis places the Chinese.
Throughout the text, the white colonists are very racist towards the Aboriginals. Even cattle, horses and white women are placed hierarchically higher in society than the black people. In response to this, Astley constructs all narrations to be written through the eyes of the Laffey family, who are respectful towards Aboriginals, hence not racist, and despise societal ideologies. By making the narration of the text show a biased point of view, readers are provoked to think and feel the same way, foregrounding racism shown in the ideologies of early Australian society, and showing that Aboriginals are real people and should receive the same treatment to that given to white people. “They looked human, they had all your features.” (pg 27) There was, however, one section in the text whose narrative point of view was not given by a character in the Laffey family. This instead was given by a voice of an Aboriginal woman, when the Aboriginal children were being taken away from their families. By giving voice to the Aboriginal society, the reader is able to get a glimpse of their point of view on the matter, which once again shows that society was racist, and Aboriginals were treated harshly.
Indigenous Australians have faced many changes to their original life style, with numerous policies being brought in. These policies had an incredible affect on how the indigenous Australians lived. The policies inflicted on the indigenous Australians varied widely and had numerous impacts. The policies of assimilation, protection and integration had mainly negative impacts on the community, causing loss of identity, language and religion. The policies of self-determination and reconciliation, had mostly positive effects to the indigenous Australian community, creating a stronger bond between black and white Australians, encouraging the concept of closing the gap between indigenous Australians and non-indigenous Australians. These policies had an incredible influence on the indigenous Australians life, changing many ways they lived. The policies changed the path of history for all Australians.
We can deny migrants oppressions by excluding them from the ability to be recognized in these oppressive spheres that we have identified; we exclude them by stating that these theories of oppression are not applicable to them since they are ‘different’. The Bellmont family justified their semi-enslavement of Frado by convincing themselves that Frado is different because of her skin color and they, as ‘good’ people, are helping Frado; they believe that they are doing something that should be appreciated. Frado was to suffer either way. The men in the family wanted to oppress Frado as a woman, and Mrs. Bellmont and Mary wanted to oppress Frado as a black person. Although Welter’s theory is true to many women, oppression is not a binary. Oppressed people can have power to oppress
The assimilation policy was a policy that existed between the 1940’s and the 1970’s, and replaced that of protectionism. Its purpose was to have all persons of aboriginal blood and mixed blood living like ‘white’ Australians, this established practice of removing Aboriginal children (generally half-bloods) from their homes was to bring them up without their culture, and they were encouraged to forget their aboriginal heritage. Children were placed in institutions where they could be 'trained' to take their place in white society. During the time of assimilation Aboriginal people were to be educated for full citizenship, and have access to public education, housing and services. However, most commonly aboriginal people did not receive equal rights and opportunities, for example, their wages were usually less than that paid to the white workers and they often did not receive recognition for the roles they played in the defence of Australia and their contribution to the cattle industry. It wasn’t until the early 1960’s that expendi...
What is the connection between official education policies and key events in Aboriginal Australian history? How have Aboriginal people responded to these policies?