Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of censorship on society
The effects of censorship on society
The effects of censorship on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of censorship on society
In his essay “What Johnny Can’t Read, and the Censorship in American Libraries,” Suzanne Fisher Staples argues books being banned in libraries and schools all over the world. The reason most of these books are being taken off the shelves is because of what they say in them, mostly swear words, sex, gender change and more. It can be good to read what you want because if can teach you what type of person you are, and what you like and don’t like.
Every year more and more books are demanded to be removed from school, and most of the time it happens. The books that are being banned are ones which were classics back in the day. If a parent doesn’t like a book and does not want their kid reading it, they can demand to have it removed but that can be a process. So, in other words, parents just take them off the shelf themselves. Librarians have been known to do this too, because if someone does complain then it could lead to them possibly losing their jobs. With so many people complaining about books, schools and librarians have to be extra careful with which books they purchase and out on
…show more content…
the shelves. Authors of books are even starting to be more cautious with what they write about and the certain words they put in their books. A librarian in Florida said, “we avoid controversy by putting bright pink slips in every book we think is controversial.” They did this to warn parents, which is a smart idea to save a lot of headaches.
It’s better than just taking these books off the shelves and wasting them, when there might be people out there who don’t have a problem and like to read these books. Suzanne says, “many parents confuse a books subject matter with the notion that the author or publisher advocates a moral agenda and regard books as enemies.” An example of that would be when there are swear words, parents think it’s telling the readers to swear but that is not the case. The reason parents get so protective about which books their kids are reading is because they have no control over their kids in a world of danger. So, by deciding which books their children are reading is a way of feeling in
control. Although, at the end of the day you can’t always prevent what kids hear and learn because these certain subjects are not just in books but in everyday lives. Like Suzanne said, “each book has its own gift to offer, but the freedom to choose which to read teaches some of life’s most important lessons.” Books teach certain things that are good for kids to know, but some parents have different opinions and reasoning’s for what they want their kids reading.
In the article How Banning Books Marginalizes Children, the author, Paul Ringel, states that approximately fifty-two percent of the books banned in the last ten years illustrate “diverse content”, such as race, religion, gender identity, etc. Ringel believes that attitudes about which books are “appropriate” for kids to read have too often suppressed stories about different cultures and life experiences. He basis his argument around the pretext that when libraries stop the banning it will allow kids to learn how to navigate imaginary worlds filled with differences and apply those lessons to their own lives.
Have you ever read a book and wondered “How is this book allowed in public libraries?” Most students do not pay attention to content; however, many parents disagree with the content their children are reading, whether the book is being taught in class or the child picked it up in the school library. Surprisingly, some school librarians and teachers disagree with certain books permitted in schools. The book Forever by Judy Blume is an example of a challenged and controversial book. Judy Blume is a children’s book author, which most people would not think that her books have been challenged.
...ain groups consider books to be immoral does not mean they need to be pulled from the shelves. Censoring is acceptable for the youth, but there is an age when we all grow up and are able to handle books with explicit content.
The American Library Association, ALA, is an organization that, among other things, compiles a list every year of the most frequently challenged books. “The American Library Association actively defends the right of library users to read, seek information, and speak freely as guaranteed by the First Amendment.” (ALA) Many times, the books on this list are challenged by parents with the want to protect their children from things they don’t believe to be appropriate. “Only parents have the right and responsibility to restrict the access of their children” (ALA) Even with these good intentions, by challenging a book, they are trying to challenge the authors’ thoughts and words, their First Amendment rights. These books usually contain complicated ideas, issues, and information that cause parents to not want them where their kids can read them. The novel My Sister’s Keeper by Jodi Picoult is a challenged book because of its homosexuality, offensive language, religious viewpoint, sexism, sexually explicit scenes, violence, and being unsuited to its age group; by all means this novel should not be challenged because, it’s use of offensive language is only used to intensify certain situations, and through all of the controversial issues it employs, it puts in perspective just how far someone would go for his/her family.
...etter than ignorance. Book censorship should not limit the amount of knowledge a child can receive, instead, books should be used to benefit children in their education and future career.
People ban or challenge books because they don't want other to read them because of their content, even thought we see most of it in our everyday life. To stop book banning and to keep books on the shelves; if a book has inappropriate content and someone wants to buy it or get it from the library or store they have to get the parents consent. This will also keep parents informed on what their child is reading.
"Book Banning." Current Issues: Macmillian Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 31 Jan. 2011.
As the American Library Association notes, books are usually banned "with the best intention…to protect others, frequently children, from difficult ideas and information." (Brunner). If a book has frightening or controversial ideas in them, adults willing often censor that book from children. From 2000 to 2009, of the 5,099 challenges that were reported, 1,639 of these challenges were in school libraries and 30 challenges in academic libraries. (Frequently Challenged Books). At various times in American history, even some of the tamest books have been banned. Harriet the Spy, was banned because it supposedly taught children to "lie, spy, back-talk, and curse." Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl was banned for being too depressing. A Light in the Attic, by Shel Silverstein, was banned because it might encourage kids to break dishes so they won't have to dry them. (Frequently Challenged Books). While some of these excuses are more reasonable than other excuses, the banning of these books prevents the children from empathizing...
“It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer. The children are the real losers because they are the ones that are not able to read the classic works of literature which are the backbone of classroom discussions all across the United States.
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
We live in an overprotective society, where people try to control other people’s lives from things that they find explicit. Many parents believe that by sheltering their kids from offensive things it will keep them safe. But, trying to live life as if there is always sunshine and no rain turns out to be a big disappointment. The banning of books has a negative effect on children and adults alike, as it can shelter children from real life situations, and revokes the rights of the people. Although people believe in banning books that contain vulgar language and profanity to help their children, it can actually hurt the child and can be considered unconstitutional.
Censorship in School Libraries The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional.
Coatney, Sharon. "Banned Books: A School Librarian's Perspective." Time. Time Inc., 22 Sept. 2000. Web. 11 Mar. 2014.
The Houston Chronicle, pp. C14. Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database. This article emphasizes the point that censors go too far when they attempt to not only ban a book for their own children but want to remove it altogether from a school library, so that other students cannot read it.
Books should be banned because Some books have Inappropriate language for children. Some books could be fine for an Adult but then to a child it could be inappropriate.Also many books include words or behavior that might be something a child shouldn’t be reading. Many books that have been banned include things like racism, negativity, and violence.Books should also be banned because some books encourage kid’s to talk back to adults.Which is not right because it is very disrespectful to talk back to Adults.Also I would not like to see my siblings reading an inappropriate book for