Analysis Of Peggy Orenstein's I Tweet, Therefore I Am?

936 Words2 Pages

Within the last two decades, our social media has rapidly developed and it becomes one of the most influent types of social communication. Though its original purpose is to be a convenient way to converse distantly, it becomes multi-tasked in recent years which some notable Internet corporations such as Facebook, Tweeter create new applications that expand its purpose from talking only. In a way, it renovates the idea of entertainment.
“Nothing is perfect.” Though social media brings us uncountable convenience, there is a trade-off with the convenience. Due to the advanced technology we have, social media has become part of our life, which it means that social media could determine our sociability. In Peggy Orenstein’s “I Tweet, Therefore I Am,” though she praises Tweeter for its convenience, at the same time, she also worries that “(Tweeter) makes the greasepaint permanent, blurring the lines not only between public and private but also between the authentic and contrived self.” Since we don’t care about who we talk to, we might act abnormally due to our feelings, and …show more content…

Unfortunately, the answer is yes. In a news report on February 5th, 2015, two young men abused each other in a game and soon they started a fight in an Internet cafe. The whole event was started from a normal public online game where these two young men were on the same team. However, both of them kept making mistakes and they blamed each other for the disastrous gameplays. As they scolded, they noticed that the “noob” guy was at the same place they were in reality. Later on, they met each other and an inevitable fight occurred. Though the conflict was stopped by the owner of the Internet cafe and other people in the cafe, both of these young men incurred minor injuries. (?) Again, this report has iterated the danger of the emotional shift that is caused by the online

Open Document