Analysis Of An Indian Father's Plea

1412 Words3 Pages

Lights, camera, action! The light switches on, and shines brightly in the center of the stage. Two people walk towards it, these are actors that were told to come out at this exact moment by the director. After days of intense rehearsals. The two young actors burst. “We are tired of working for you” the two participants yell towards the director. The director in a surprising manner walks up to the stage, stares down at the performers and laughs. “You are going nowhere; I have your contract and your pay, now back to your positions!” The performers stand and continue their roles with no opinion in the matter. The camera turns off, the shadows of the actors disappear. The common person stands up and is face to face with the director. The director …show more content…

Although another reason, apart from how expensive it is, is the fact that the public industries want a certain manner of learning. The child could be music talented or physically talented but they are manipulated to learn from a book rather than expressing their own ways much. This is the case of the son of the writer, Robert Lake, from “An Indian Father’s Plea”. In which the cultural difference in both the native tribe and the society that is America has named the child, Wind-Wolf, a “slow learner”. With such case, the father argues that the child “has already been through quite an education compared with his peers in Western society.” Although the standards that we as a society have for certain age groups have increased and do not take into consideration the fact that there are many ways to be intelligent rather than knowing your ABC’S and what the Pythagorean Theorem is. These individual guidelines, such as Standardized test, help the teachers see where the student is academically, yet it is not an appropriate to categorize a child by the way they performed based on the test. Like the famous scientist, Albert Einstein once said: “everybody is a genius but if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree it will live its whole …show more content…

A positive effect of these standards is having to pressure to do the “correct” moral action when presented in a situation. In the basic example of seeing someone drop a wallet with hundreds of dollars in it, the question of what to do with it stands. In the worst-case scenario, if no one is in sight, the person grabs the wallet and takes it without regards to the responsibility or consequences for the person that lost the money. Although, switching the scenario into a crowd around the person. The same person will look around and double check for their surroundings. Seeing that there are civilians judging at his next action, he will pick up the wallet and go after the person that accidently dropped it. Why? Well because in his mind he knows that if he does the wrong action in front of others, he will be arbitrated as a wrong character in the society he lives. In the long run, it is beneficial, although in this case scenario this fellow was just manipulated by the social order to go against his bad intentions in an example of how pressure from what other’s think influence your

Open Document